Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] rust: device: implement device context marker

[Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>]

On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 06:31:48PM +0100, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 10:21:58AM -0700, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 05:09:05PM +0100, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> > > Some bus device functions should only be called from bus callbacks,
> > > such as probe(), remove(), resume(), suspend(), etc.
> > > 
> > > To ensure this add device context marker structs, that can be used as
> > > generics for bus device implementations.
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
> > > Suggested-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
> > 
> > Try chronological order for the tags? It was suggested first and then
> > reviewed.
> 
> Is that a thing? When I apply patches I usully keep ACKs, RBs and SOBs together
> at the bottom.

I don't think it's a hard requirement, but it makes logical sense to
order the tags except your own SoB based on chronological order when
re-submitting a new version IMO. It's in the same spirit of putting SoBs
in chronological when multiple people handle the patches.

But it's your choice, I just feel it's a bit odd in the current order
;-)

Regards,
Boqun