public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
	Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
	kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] perf report: Sort by sampled cycles percent per block for tui
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 20:54:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <67f89552-dec9-e42e-0e3c-b55d9f5b92f4@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191023113656.GP22919@krava>



On 10/23/2019 7:36 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 04:07:10PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
>> Previous patch has implemented a new sort option "total_cycles".
>> But there was only stdio mode supported.
>>
>> This patch supports the tui mode and support '--percent-limit'.
>>
>> For example,
>>
>>   perf record -b ./div
>>   perf report -s total_cycles --percent-limit 1
>>
>>   # Samples: 2753248 of event 'cycles'
>>   Sampled Cycles%  Sampled Cycles  Avg Cycles%  Avg Cycles                                              [Program Block Range]         Shared Object
>>            26.04%            2.8M        0.40%          18                                             [div.c:42 -> div.c:39]                   div
>>            15.17%            1.2M        0.16%           7                                 [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:380]          libc-2.27.so
>>             5.11%          402.0K        0.04%           2                                             [div.c:27 -> div.c:28]                   div
>>             4.87%          381.6K        0.04%           2                                     [random.c:288 -> random.c:291]          libc-2.27.so
>>             4.53%          381.0K        0.04%           2                                             [div.c:40 -> div.c:40]                   div
>>             3.85%          300.9K        0.02%           1                                             [div.c:22 -> div.c:25]                   div
>>             3.08%          241.1K        0.02%           1                                           [rand.c:26 -> rand.c:27]          libc-2.27.so
>>             3.06%          240.0K        0.02%           1                                     [random.c:291 -> random.c:291]          libc-2.27.so
>>             2.78%          215.7K        0.02%           1                                     [random.c:298 -> random.c:298]          libc-2.27.so
>>             2.52%          198.3K        0.02%           1                                     [random.c:293 -> random.c:293]          libc-2.27.so
>>             2.36%          184.8K        0.02%           1                                           [rand.c:28 -> rand.c:28]          libc-2.27.so
>>             2.33%          180.5K        0.02%           1                                     [random.c:295 -> random.c:295]          libc-2.27.so
>>             2.28%          176.7K        0.02%           1                                     [random.c:295 -> random.c:295]          libc-2.27.so
>>             2.20%          168.8K        0.02%           1                                         [rand@plt+0 -> rand@plt+0]                   div
>>             1.98%          158.2K        0.02%           1                                 [random_r.c:388 -> random_r.c:388]          libc-2.27.so
>>             1.57%          123.3K        0.02%           1                                             [div.c:42 -> div.c:44]                   div
>>             1.44%          116.0K        0.42%          19                                 [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:394]          libc-2.27.so
>>
>>   v3:
>>   ---
>>   Minor change since the function name is changed:
>>   block_total_cycles_percent -> block_info__total_cycles_percent
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>   tools/perf/builtin-report.c    | 30 +++++++++++++---
>>   tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>   tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.h |  2 ++
>>   tools/perf/util/hist.h         | 12 +++++++
>>   4 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
>> index dbae1812ce47..707512f177cb 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
>> @@ -800,6 +800,27 @@ static int hists__fprintf_all_blocks(struct hists *hists, struct report *rep)
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>>   
>> +static int perf_evlist__tui_block_hists_browse(struct evlist *evlist,
>> +					       struct report *rep)
>> +{
>> +	struct block_hist *bh = &rep->block_hist;
>> +	struct evsel *pos;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	evlist__for_each_entry(evlist, pos) {
>> +		struct hists *hists = evsel__hists(pos);
>> +
>> +		get_block_hists(hists, bh, rep);
> 
> same here, this is display function, compute the data before
> 
> thanks,
> jirka
>

That will be a little bit complicated. But OK, I will try that.

Thanks
Jin Yao

>> +		symbol_conf.report_individual_block = true;
>> +		ret = block_hists_tui_browse(bh, pos, rep->min_percent);
>> +		hists__delete_entries(&bh->block_hists);
>> +		if (ret != 0)
>> +			return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
> 
> SNIP
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2019-10-23 12:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-22  8:07 [PATCH v3 0/5] perf report: Support sorting all blocks by cycles Jin Yao
2019-10-22  8:07 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] perf util: Cleanup and refactor block info functions Jin Yao
2019-10-23 11:37   ` Jiri Olsa
2019-10-23 12:47     ` Jin, Yao
2019-10-22  8:07 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] perf util: Count the total cycles of all samples Jin Yao
2019-10-22  8:07 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] perf report: Sort by sampled cycles percent per block for stdio Jin Yao
2019-10-23 11:36   ` Jiri Olsa
2019-10-23 13:13     ` Jin, Yao
2019-10-23 11:36   ` Jiri Olsa
2019-10-23 13:11     ` Jin, Yao
2019-10-23 11:36   ` Jiri Olsa
2019-10-23 13:09     ` Jin, Yao
2019-10-23 14:27       ` Jiri Olsa
2019-10-23 14:46         ` Jin, Yao
2019-10-22  8:07 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] perf report: Support --percent-limit for total_cycles Jin Yao
2019-10-22  8:07 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] perf report: Sort by sampled cycles percent per block for tui Jin Yao
2019-10-23 11:36   ` Jiri Olsa
2019-10-23 12:54     ` Jin, Yao [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=67f89552-dec9-e42e-0e3c-b55d9f5b92f4@linux.intel.com \
    --to=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=yao.jin@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox