From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
paulmck <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
linux-api <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Neel Natu <neelnatu@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for 5.5 1/2 v2] rseq: Fix: Clarify rseq.h UAPI rseq_cs memory reclaim requirements
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 14:10:37 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <688649540.853.1578337837967.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191220203318.18739-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
----- On Dec 20, 2019, at 3:33 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com wrote:
> The rseq.h UAPI documents that the rseq_cs field must be cleared
> before reclaiming memory that contains the targeted struct rseq_cs.
>
> We should extend this comment to also dictate that the rseq_cs field
> must be cleared before reclaiming memory of the code pointed to by
> the rseq_cs start_ip and post_commit_offset fields.
>
> While we can expect that use of dlclose(3) will typically unmap
> both struct rseq_cs and its associated code at once, nothing would
> theoretically prevent a JIT from reclaiming the code without
> reclaiming the struct rseq_cs, which would erroneously allow the
> kernel to consider new code which is not a rseq critical section
> as a rseq critical section following a code reclaim.
Hi Peter,
Is there anything preventing this rseq UAPI documentation fix from being merged ?
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
> Suggested-by: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
> Cc: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> Cc: "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
> Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
> Cc: Neel Natu <neelnatu@google.com>
> Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/rseq.h | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/rseq.h b/include/uapi/linux/rseq.h
> index 9a402fdb60e9..d94afdfc4b7c 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/rseq.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/rseq.h
> @@ -100,7 +100,9 @@ struct rseq {
> * instruction sequence block, as well as when the kernel detects that
> * it is preempting or delivering a signal outside of the range
> * targeted by the rseq_cs. Also needs to be set to NULL by user-space
> - * before reclaiming memory that contains the targeted struct rseq_cs.
> + * before reclaiming memory that contains the targeted struct rseq_cs
> + * or reclaiming memory that contains the code referred to by the
> + * start_ip and post_commit_offset fields of struct rseq_cs.
> *
> * Read and set by the kernel. Set by user-space with single-copy
> * atomicity semantics. This field should only be updated by the
> --
> 2.17.1
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-06 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-20 20:33 [PATCH for 5.5 1/2 v2] rseq: Fix: Clarify rseq.h UAPI rseq_cs memory reclaim requirements Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-12-20 20:33 ` [PATCH for 5.5 2/2 v2] rseq/selftests: Clarify rseq_prepare_unload() helper requirements Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-01-06 19:10 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=688649540.853.1578337837967.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=fw@deneb.enyo.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neelnatu@google.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox