From: syzbot <syzbot+2e9e529ac0b319316453@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
ujwal.kundur@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [block?] possible deadlock in __del_gendisk
Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2025 08:45:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <688e327f.a70a0220.249f57.0003.GAE@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALkFLL+Lcs=wiD11AxJGt9zQ0k3Lo23ppJ2yRbW3qLV7ZOi7+A@mail.gmail.com>
Hello,
syzbot has tested the proposed patch but the reproducer is still triggering an issue:
possible deadlock in del_gendisk
wlan1: Created IBSS using preconfigured BSSID 50:50:50:50:50:50
wlan1: Creating new IBSS network, BSSID 50:50:50:50:50:50
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.16.0-syzkaller-ga6923c06a3b2-dirty #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kworker/u8:2/36 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888025106188 (&set->update_nr_hwq_lock){++++}-{4:4}, at: del_gendisk+0xf0/0x180 block/genhd.c:823
but task is already holding lock:
ffff8880251060d8 (&set->tag_list_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: del_gendisk+0xe8/0x180 block/genhd.c:822
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&set->tag_list_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
lock_acquire+0x120/0x360 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:598 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x187/0x1360 kernel/locking/mutex.c:760
blk_mq_sysfs_register+0x196/0x530 block/blk-mq-sysfs.c:232
blk_register_queue+0xf2/0x400 block/blk-sysfs.c:884
__add_disk+0x677/0xd50 block/genhd.c:528
add_disk_fwnode+0xfc/0x480 block/genhd.c:597
<kernel::block::mq::gen_disk::GenDiskBuilder>::build::<rnull::NullBlkDevice> rust/kernel/block/mq/gen_disk.rs:160 [inline]
<rnull::NullBlkModule as kernel::InPlaceModule>::init::{closure#0} drivers/block/rnull.rs:49 [inline]
<rnull::NullBlkModule as kernel::InPlaceModule>::init+0x8ee/0xc00 drivers/block/rnull.rs:46
rnull::__module_init::__module_init::__init drivers/block/rnull.rs:27 [inline]
__rnull_mod_init+0x1a/0x70 drivers/block/rnull.rs:27
do_one_initcall+0x233/0x820 init/main.c:1269
do_initcall_level+0x104/0x190 init/main.c:1331
do_initcalls+0x59/0xa0 init/main.c:1347
kernel_init_freeable+0x334/0x4a0 init/main.c:1579
kernel_init+0x1d/0x1d0 init/main.c:1469
ret_from_fork+0x3f9/0x770 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:148
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245
-> #0 (&set->update_nr_hwq_lock){++++}-{4:4}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3165 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3284 [inline]
validate_chain+0xb9b/0x2140 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3908
__lock_acquire+0xab9/0xd20 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5237
lock_acquire+0x120/0x360 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868
down_read+0x46/0x2e0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1522
del_gendisk+0xf0/0x180 block/genhd.c:823
nbd_dev_remove drivers/block/nbd.c:268 [inline]
nbd_dev_remove_work+0x47/0xe0 drivers/block/nbd.c:284
process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3236 [inline]
process_scheduled_works+0xade/0x17b0 kernel/workqueue.c:3319
worker_thread+0x8a0/0xda0 kernel/workqueue.c:3400
kthread+0x711/0x8a0 kernel/kthread.c:464
ret_from_fork+0x3f9/0x770 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:148
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&set->tag_list_lock);
lock(&set->update_nr_hwq_lock);
lock(&set->tag_list_lock);
rlock(&set->update_nr_hwq_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
3 locks held by kworker/u8:2/36:
#0: ffff888025c60148 ((wq_completion)nbd-del){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3211 [inline]
#0: ffff888025c60148 ((wq_completion)nbd-del){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x9b4/0x17b0 kernel/workqueue.c:3319
#1: ffffc90000ac7bc0 ((work_completion)(&nbd->remove_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3212 [inline]
#1: ffffc90000ac7bc0 ((work_completion)(&nbd->remove_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x9ef/0x17b0 kernel/workqueue.c:3319
#2: ffff8880251060d8 (&set->tag_list_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: del_gendisk+0xe8/0x180 block/genhd.c:822
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 36 Comm: kworker/u8:2 Not tainted 6.16.0-syzkaller-ga6923c06a3b2-dirty #0 PREEMPT(full)
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/12/2025
Workqueue: nbd-del nbd_dev_remove_work
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x189/0x250 lib/dump_stack.c:120
print_circular_bug+0x2ee/0x310 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2043
check_noncircular+0x134/0x160 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2175
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3165 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3284 [inline]
validate_chain+0xb9b/0x2140 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3908
__lock_acquire+0xab9/0xd20 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5237
lock_acquire+0x120/0x360 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868
down_read+0x46/0x2e0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1522
del_gendisk+0xf0/0x180 block/genhd.c:823
nbd_dev_remove drivers/block/nbd.c:268 [inline]
nbd_dev_remove_work+0x47/0xe0 drivers/block/nbd.c:284
process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3236 [inline]
process_scheduled_works+0xade/0x17b0 kernel/workqueue.c:3319
worker_thread+0x8a0/0xda0 kernel/workqueue.c:3400
kthread+0x711/0x8a0 kernel/kthread.c:464
ret_from_fork+0x3f9/0x770 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:148
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245
</TASK>
Tested on:
commit: a6923c06 Merge tag 'bpf-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org..
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1346dcf0580000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=18eb6d916c138763
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=2e9e529ac0b319316453
compiler: Debian clang version 20.1.7 (++20250616065708+6146a88f6049-1~exp1~20250616065826.132), Debian LLD 20.1.7
patch: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/patch.diff?x=11010aa2580000
next parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-02 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CALkFLL+Lcs=wiD11AxJGt9zQ0k3Lo23ppJ2yRbW3qLV7ZOi7+A@mail.gmail.com>
2025-08-02 15:45 ` syzbot [this message]
[not found] <CALkFLL+Rdkg+-WA+Jb10QfnPoiYpVqHRi+NUvNiAw=XLe6kuhg@mail.gmail.com>
2025-08-02 23:17 ` [syzbot] [block?] possible deadlock in __del_gendisk syzbot
[not found] <CALkFLL+WiKWCw1zOPhBJZ=wLQjZPYvhUhEoxDOmeO8F_w7Vmng@mail.gmail.com>
2025-08-02 22:44 ` syzbot
[not found] <CALkFLLLFkpaTLff6E4wUA-fYBZM69u0azLF+frYZrf9eSuRzJQ@mail.gmail.com>
2025-08-02 22:33 ` syzbot
[not found] <CALkFLLJjzTD3HpPLnaKwVKn-47rJQBghaSrpZCT8Nrbf3CiH9g@mail.gmail.com>
2025-08-02 13:09 ` syzbot
[not found] <CALkFLLKa454W2SGq3aGY+WxOHkx7bAkVAZO7vpXU0v7h6dQtOg@mail.gmail.com>
2025-08-02 12:45 ` syzbot
[not found] <20250529102503.2425-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2025-05-29 10:41 ` syzbot
[not found] <20250528105149.2400-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2025-05-28 11:07 ` syzbot
[not found] <20250527112459.2370-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2025-05-27 11:42 ` syzbot
2025-05-26 13:05 syzbot
2025-05-27 3:12 ` syzbot
2025-06-23 4:43 ` Ming Lei
2025-06-23 4:00 ` syzbot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=688e327f.a70a0220.249f57.0003.GAE@google.com \
--to=syzbot+2e9e529ac0b319316453@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=ujwal.kundur@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox