From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: bp <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: hch <hch@lst.de>, anton ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>,
x86 <x86@kernel.org>, linux-um <linux-um@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: remove set_fs for UML
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 17:55:59 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <689476797.194605.1640192159613.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YcMuW88cOBNXAdb/@zn.tnic>
Boris,
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "bp" <bp@alien8.de>
> An: "hch" <hch@lst.de>
> CC: "richard" <richard@nod.at>, "anton ivanov" <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>, "x86" <x86@kernel.org>, "linux-um"
> <linux-um@lists.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. Dezember 2021 14:55:39
> Betreff: Re: remove set_fs for UML
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 09:17:53AM +0100, hch wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 10:05:03PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> > So far UML seems to work with these changes applied. :-)
>> > I have applied both patches to my UML tree for now, I assume x86 maintainers are
>> > fine with
>> > patch 1/2?
>>
>> Looks like patch 1 needs this fixup for some configurations, where
>> pci.h doesn't get pulled into kvm by other means.
>>
>> But we probably want an ACK from the x86 maintainers to be sure anyway..
>
> I don't see why not so
>
> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
>
> Should I take the first one along with this hunk below?
Would be great!
When I'll drop "x86/mtrr: remove the mtrr_bp_init stub" from the UML tree.
Thanks,
//richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-22 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-15 16:56 remove set_fs for UML Christoph Hellwig
2021-12-15 16:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/mtrr: remove the mtrr_bp_init stub Christoph Hellwig
2021-12-22 18:56 ` [tip: x86/misc] x86/mtrr: Remove the mtrr_bp_init() stub tip-bot2 for Christoph Hellwig
2021-12-15 16:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] um: remove set_fs Christoph Hellwig
2021-12-21 21:05 ` remove set_fs for UML Richard Weinberger
2021-12-22 8:17 ` hch
2021-12-22 13:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-22 16:55 ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
2021-12-22 18:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-01-01 0:12 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=689476797.194605.1640192159613.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at \
--to=richard@nod.at \
--cc=anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox