linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>,
	Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>, Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>,
	"Rick Edgecombe" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 07/12] KVM: TDX: Avoid a double-KVM_BUG_ON() in tdx_sept_zap_private_spte()
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 10:02:41 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <68b06f9131be5_211482942e@iweiny-mobl.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250827000522.4022426-8-seanjc@google.com>

Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Return -EIO immediately from tdx_sept_zap_private_spte() if the number of
> to-be-added pages underflows, so that the following "KVM_BUG_ON(err, kvm)"
> isn't also triggered.  Isolating the check from the "is premap error"
> if-statement will also allow adding a lockdep assertion that premap errors
> are encountered if and only if slots_lock is held.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
> index ef4ffcad131f..88079e2d45fb 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
> @@ -1773,8 +1773,10 @@ static int tdx_sept_zap_private_spte(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn,
>  		err = tdh_mem_range_block(&kvm_tdx->td, gpa, tdx_level, &entry, &level_state);
>  		tdx_no_vcpus_enter_stop(kvm);
>  	}
> -	if (tdx_is_sept_zap_err_due_to_premap(kvm_tdx, err, entry, level) &&
> -	    !KVM_BUG_ON(!atomic64_read(&kvm_tdx->nr_premapped), kvm)) {
> +	if (tdx_is_sept_zap_err_due_to_premap(kvm_tdx, err, entry, level)) {
> +		if (KVM_BUG_ON(!atomic64_read(&kvm_tdx->nr_premapped), kvm))
> +			return -EIO;

Won't this -EIO cause the KVM_BUG_ON on in remove_external_spte() to fire too?

static void remove_external_spte(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn, u64 old_spte,
                                 int level)
{
	...
	ret = kvm_x86_call(remove_external_spte)(kvm, gfn, level, old_pfn);
	KVM_BUG_ON(ret, kvm);
}


This patch is better than 3 bug ons but wouldn't it be better to make both
KVM_BUG_ON's internal errors or debug?

Something like this:

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
index 4920ee8ad773..83065f3fe605 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
@@ -1774,14 +1774,16 @@ static int tdx_sept_zap_private_spte(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn,
                tdx_no_vcpus_enter_stop(kvm);
        }
        if (tdx_is_sept_zap_err_due_to_premap(kvm_tdx, err, entry, level)) {
-               if (KVM_BUG_ON(!atomic64_read(&kvm_tdx->nr_premapped), kvm))
+               if (!atomic64_read(&kvm_tdx->nr_premapped)) {
+                       pr_err("nr_premapped underflow\n");
                        return -EIO;
+               }
 
                atomic64_dec(&kvm_tdx->nr_premapped);
                return 0;
        }
 
-       if (KVM_BUG_ON(err, kvm)) {
+       if (err) {
                pr_tdx_error_2(TDH_MEM_RANGE_BLOCK, err, entry, level_state);
                return -EIO;
        }

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-08-28 15:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-27  0:05 [RFC PATCH 00/12] KVM: x86/mmu: TDX post-populate cleanups Sean Christopherson
2025-08-27  0:05 ` [RFC PATCH 01/12] KVM: TDX: Drop PROVE_MMU=y sanity check on to-be-populated mappings Sean Christopherson
2025-08-27  8:14   ` Yan Zhao
2025-08-28  0:37   ` Ira Weiny
2025-08-28  2:13   ` Huang, Kai
2025-08-27  0:05 ` [RFC PATCH 02/12] KVM: x86/mmu: Add dedicated API to map guest_memfd pfn into TDP MMU Sean Christopherson
2025-08-27  8:25   ` Yan Zhao
2025-08-28  0:54     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-08-28  1:26       ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-08-28  6:23         ` Yan Zhao
2025-08-28 19:40           ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-29  1:16             ` Yan Zhao
2025-09-01  0:39               ` Yan Zhao
2025-08-28  6:55       ` Yan Zhao
2025-08-28  0:40   ` Ira Weiny
2025-08-28  1:51     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-08-28 19:57       ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-27  0:05 ` [RFC PATCH 03/12] Revert "KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Add a helper function to walk down the TDP MMU" Sean Christopherson
2025-08-27  0:05 ` [RFC PATCH 04/12] KVM: x86/mmu: Rename kvm_tdp_map_page() to kvm_tdp_prefault_page() Sean Christopherson
2025-08-28  2:01   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-08-28 18:50     ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-28 19:04       ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-08-27  0:05 ` [RFC PATCH 05/12] KVM: TDX: Drop superfluous page pinning in S-EPT management Sean Christopherson
2025-08-27  8:33   ` Yan Zhao
2025-08-28  2:05     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-08-28 20:16       ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-28  0:36   ` Ira Weiny
2025-08-28  7:08     ` Yan Zhao
2025-08-28 15:54       ` Ira Weiny
2025-08-28  2:45   ` Huang, Kai
2025-08-27  0:05 ` [RFC PATCH 06/12] KVM: TDX: Return -EIO, not -EINVAL, on a KVM_BUG_ON() condition Sean Christopherson
2025-08-27  8:39   ` Yan Zhao
2025-08-27 17:26     ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-28  2:11   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-08-28 19:21     ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-28 20:13       ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-08-28 21:00         ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-28 21:19           ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-08-28 21:34             ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-28 15:03   ` Ira Weiny
2025-08-27  0:05 ` [RFC PATCH 07/12] KVM: TDX: Avoid a double-KVM_BUG_ON() in tdx_sept_zap_private_spte() Sean Christopherson
2025-08-28  2:19   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-08-28 14:50     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-08-29  1:10       ` Yan Zhao
2025-08-28 15:02   ` Ira Weiny [this message]
2025-08-27  0:05 ` [RFC PATCH 08/12] KVM: TDX: Use atomic64_dec_return() instead of a poor equivalent Sean Christopherson
2025-08-28  2:56   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-08-28  6:48     ` Yan Zhao
2025-08-28 19:14       ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-08-28 22:33         ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-28 23:18           ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-08-28 15:03   ` Ira Weiny
2025-08-27  0:05 ` [RFC PATCH 09/12] KVM: TDX: Fold tdx_mem_page_record_premap_cnt() into its sole caller Sean Christopherson
2025-08-27  9:02   ` Yan Zhao
2025-08-27 19:08     ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-28  3:13       ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-08-28  5:56         ` Yan Zhao
2025-08-28 19:08           ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-08-28  5:43       ` Yan Zhao
2025-08-28 17:00         ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-28 18:52           ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-08-28 20:26             ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-28 21:33               ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-08-28 21:57                 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-28 23:17                   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-08-29  6:08                   ` Yan Zhao
2025-08-28 22:06                 ` Ira Weiny
2025-08-28 23:17                   ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-29  0:35                     ` Ira Weiny
2025-08-29  6:06                 ` Yan Zhao
2025-08-28 21:44             ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-29  2:42             ` Binbin Wu
2025-08-29  2:31           ` Yan Zhao
2025-08-29  6:33             ` Yan Zhao
2025-08-28 15:30       ` Ira Weiny
2025-08-28 15:28     ` Ira Weiny
2025-08-27  0:05 ` [RFC PATCH 10/12] KVM: TDX: Assert that slots_lock is held when nr_premapped is accessed Sean Christopherson
2025-08-27  0:05 ` [RFC PATCH 11/12] KVM: TDX: Track nr_premapped as an "unsigned long", not an "atomic64_t" Sean Christopherson
2025-08-27  9:12   ` Yan Zhao
2025-08-27  0:05 ` [RFC PATCH 12/12] KVM: TDX: Rename nr_premapped to nr_pending_tdh_mem_page_adds Sean Christopherson
2025-08-27  9:22   ` Yan Zhao
2025-08-28 15:23   ` Ira Weiny
2025-08-27  9:48 ` [RFC PATCH 00/12] KVM: x86/mmu: TDX post-populate cleanups Yan Zhao
2025-08-28 19:01 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-08-28 23:19   ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=68b06f9131be5_211482942e@iweiny-mobl.notmuch \
    --to=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=vannapurve@google.com \
    --cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).