* [syzbot] [netfs?] kernel BUG in netfs_perform_write
@ 2025-09-04 17:48 syzbot
2025-09-05 0:46 ` Forwarded: " syzbot
2025-09-05 1:59 ` [PATCH] netfs: Prevent duplicate unlocking Lizhi Xu
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: syzbot @ 2025-09-04 17:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dhowells, linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel, netfs, pc, syzkaller-bugs
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: b9a10f876409 Merge tag 'soc-fixes-6.17-2' of git://git.ker..
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=148b6312580000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=d4703ac89d9e185a
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=b73c7d94a151e2ee1e9b
compiler: gcc (Debian 12.2.0-14+deb12u1) 12.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=14dd1a42580000
C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=12eb0134580000
Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/f78fc7403c46/disk-b9a10f87.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/a6cdb7126dd0/vmlinux-b9a10f87.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/3e315b6f116e/bzImage-b9a10f87.xz
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+b73c7d94a151e2ee1e9b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
kill_anon_super+0x3a/0x60 fs/super.c:1282
v9fs_kill_super+0x3d/0xa0 fs/9p/vfs_super.c:195
deactivate_locked_super+0xc1/0x1a0 fs/super.c:474
deactivate_super fs/super.c:507 [inline]
deactivate_super+0xde/0x100 fs/super.c:503
cleanup_mnt+0x225/0x450 fs/namespace.c:1375
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at mm/filemap.c:1498!
Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 6039 Comm: syz.0.22 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full)
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/12/2025
RIP: 0010:folio_unlock mm/filemap.c:1498 [inline]
RIP: 0010:folio_unlock+0xb3/0xd0 mm/filemap.c:1493
Code: b3 5c c9 ff 48 89 ef 31 f6 e8 f9 ed ff ff 5b 5d e9 a2 5c c9 ff e8 9d 5c c9 ff 48 c7 c6 60 19 b9 8b 48 89 ef e8 0e 0d 12 00 90 <0f> 0b 48 89 df e8 d3 bb 2f 00 e9 7b ff ff ff 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00
RSP: 0018:ffffc90002e97980 EFLAGS: 00010293
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: ffff88802f3cc880 RSI: ffffffff81f231a2 RDI: ffff88802f3cccc4
RBP: ffffea0001850e80 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001
R10: ffffffff90ab5c97 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88805caf0f00
R13: ffffc90002e97de8 R14: ffffea0001850e80 R15: dffffc0000000000
FS: 000055555d2d5500(0000) GS:ffff8881246b8000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 000000c0071b4000 CR3: 000000007d73b000 CR4: 00000000003526f0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
netfs_perform_write+0xacd/0x1e60 fs/netfs/buffered_write.c:407
netfs_buffered_write_iter_locked fs/netfs/buffered_write.c:452 [inline]
netfs_file_write_iter+0x495/0x570 fs/netfs/buffered_write.c:491
v9fs_file_write_iter+0x9b/0x100 fs/9p/vfs_file.c:407
new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:593 [inline]
vfs_write+0x7d3/0x11d0 fs/read_write.c:686
ksys_write+0x12a/0x250 fs/read_write.c:738
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x4c0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f1f5f98ebe9
Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffd97e08798 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f1f5fbc5fa0 RCX: 00007f1f5f98ebe9
RDX: 0000000000000018 RSI: 0000200000000380 RDI: 0000000000000007
RBP: 00007f1f5fa11e19 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00007f1f5fbc5fa0 R14: 00007f1f5fbc5fa0 R15: 0000000000000003
</TASK>
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
RIP: 0010:folio_unlock mm/filemap.c:1498 [inline]
RIP: 0010:folio_unlock+0xb3/0xd0 mm/filemap.c:1493
Code: b3 5c c9 ff 48 89 ef 31 f6 e8 f9 ed ff ff 5b 5d e9 a2 5c c9 ff e8 9d 5c c9 ff 48 c7 c6 60 19 b9 8b 48 89 ef e8 0e 0d 12 00 90 <0f> 0b 48 89 df e8 d3 bb 2f 00 e9 7b ff ff ff 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00
RSP: 0018:ffffc90002e97980 EFLAGS: 00010293
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: ffff88802f3cc880 RSI: ffffffff81f231a2 RDI: ffff88802f3cccc4
RBP: ffffea0001850e80 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001
R10: ffffffff90ab5c97 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88805caf0f00
R13: ffffc90002e97de8 R14: ffffea0001850e80 R15: dffffc0000000000
FS: 000055555d2d5500(0000) GS:ffff8881246b8000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 000000c0071b4000 CR3: 000000007d73b000 CR4: 00000000003526f0
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.
syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title
If you want syzbot to run the reproducer, reply with:
#syz test: git://repo/address.git branch-or-commit-hash
If you attach or paste a git patch, syzbot will apply it before testing.
If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)
If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report
If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Forwarded: Re: [syzbot] [netfs?] kernel BUG in netfs_perform_write
2025-09-04 17:48 [syzbot] [netfs?] kernel BUG in netfs_perform_write syzbot
@ 2025-09-05 0:46 ` syzbot
2025-09-05 1:59 ` [PATCH] netfs: Prevent duplicate unlocking Lizhi Xu
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: syzbot @ 2025-09-05 0:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
For archival purposes, forwarding an incoming command email to
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org.
***
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [netfs?] kernel BUG in netfs_perform_write
Author: lizhi.xu@windriver.com
#syz test
diff --git a/fs/netfs/buffered_write.c b/fs/netfs/buffered_write.c
index f27ea5099a68..09394ac2c180 100644
--- a/fs/netfs/buffered_write.c
+++ b/fs/netfs/buffered_write.c
@@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ ssize_t netfs_perform_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
folio_put(folio);
ret = filemap_write_and_wait_range(mapping, fpos, fpos + flen - 1);
if (ret < 0)
- goto error_folio_unlock;
+ goto out;
continue;
copied:
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [syzbot] [netfs?] kernel BUG in netfs_perform_write
[not found] <20250905004621.1849126-1-lizhi.xu@windriver.com>
@ 2025-09-05 1:27 ` syzbot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: syzbot @ 2025-09-05 1:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, lizhi.xu, syzkaller-bugs
Hello,
syzbot has tested the proposed patch but the reproducer is still triggering an issue:
INFO: task hung in v9fs_evict_inode
INFO: task syz-executor:10275 blocked for more than 143 seconds.
Not tainted syzkaller #0
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
task:syz-executor state:D stack:23976 pid:10275 tgid:10275 ppid:1 task_flags:0x400140 flags:0x00004004
Call Trace:
<TASK>
context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:5357 [inline]
__schedule+0x1190/0x5de0 kernel/sched/core.c:6961
__schedule_loop kernel/sched/core.c:7043 [inline]
schedule+0xe7/0x3a0 kernel/sched/core.c:7058
netfs_wait_for_outstanding_io include/linux/netfs.h:552 [inline]
v9fs_evict_inode+0x26f/0x300 fs/9p/vfs_inode.c:348
evict+0x3e3/0x920 fs/inode.c:810
iput_final fs/inode.c:1897 [inline]
iput fs/inode.c:1923 [inline]
iput+0x521/0x880 fs/inode.c:1909
dentry_unlink_inode+0x29c/0x480 fs/dcache.c:466
__dentry_kill+0x1d0/0x600 fs/dcache.c:669
dput.part.0+0x4b1/0x9b0 fs/dcache.c:911
dput fs/dcache.c:901 [inline]
do_one_tree fs/dcache.c:1607 [inline]
shrink_dcache_for_umount+0x159/0x3e0 fs/dcache.c:1621
generic_shutdown_super+0x6c/0x390 fs/super.c:621
kill_anon_super+0x3a/0x60 fs/super.c:1282
v9fs_kill_super+0x3d/0xa0 fs/9p/vfs_super.c:195
deactivate_locked_super+0xc1/0x1a0 fs/super.c:474
deactivate_super fs/super.c:507 [inline]
deactivate_super+0xde/0x100 fs/super.c:503
cleanup_mnt+0x225/0x450 fs/namespace.c:1375
task_work_run+0x150/0x240 kernel/task_work.c:227
resume_user_mode_work include/linux/resume_user_mode.h:50 [inline]
exit_to_user_mode_loop+0xeb/0x110 kernel/entry/common.c:43
exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/irq-entry-common.h:225 [inline]
syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work include/linux/entry-common.h:175 [inline]
syscall_exit_to_user_mode include/linux/entry-common.h:210 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x3f6/0x4c0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:100
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7fcecc38ff17
RSP: 002b:00007ffd3a66f178 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a6
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00007fcecc411c05 RCX: 00007fcecc38ff17
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000009 RDI: 00007ffd3a66f230
RBP: 00007ffd3a66f230 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 00000000ffffffff R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007ffd3a6702c0
R13: 00007fcecc411c05 R14: 000000000003f589 R15: 00007ffd3a670300
</TASK>
Showing all locks held in the system:
1 lock held by khungtaskd/31:
#0: ffffffff8e5c1260 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:331 [inline]
#0: ffffffff8e5c1260 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:841 [inline]
#0: ffffffff8e5c1260 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: debug_show_all_locks+0x36/0x1c0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:6775
2 locks held by kworker/u8:3/37:
#0: ffff88801b881148 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x12a2/0x1b70 kernel/workqueue.c:3211
#1: ffffc90000ad7d10 ((work_completion)(&rreq->cleanup_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x929/0x1b70 kernel/workqueue.c:3212
2 locks held by getty/5606:
#0: ffff88814d69e0a0 (&tty->ldisc_sem){++++}-{0:0}, at: tty_ldisc_ref_wait+0x24/0x80 drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c:243
#1: ffffc900036bb2f0 (&ldata->atomic_read_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: n_tty_read+0x41b/0x14f0 drivers/tty/n_tty.c:2222
1 lock held by syz-executor/10275:
#0: ffff88805bc120e0 (&type->s_umount_key#68){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __super_lock fs/super.c:57 [inline]
#0: ffff88805bc120e0 (&type->s_umount_key#68){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __super_lock_excl fs/super.c:72 [inline]
#0: ffff88805bc120e0 (&type->s_umount_key#68){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: deactivate_super fs/super.c:506 [inline]
#0: ffff88805bc120e0 (&type->s_umount_key#68){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: deactivate_super+0xd6/0x100 fs/super.c:503
1 lock held by syz-executor/14777:
#0: ffffffff8e5cc6c0 (rcu_state.barrier_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: rcu_barrier+0x48/0x6e0 kernel/rcu/tree.c:3815
=============================================
NMI backtrace for cpu 1
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 31 Comm: khungtaskd Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full)
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/12/2025
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:120
nmi_cpu_backtrace+0x27b/0x390 lib/nmi_backtrace.c:113
nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace+0x29c/0x300 lib/nmi_backtrace.c:62
trigger_all_cpu_backtrace include/linux/nmi.h:160 [inline]
check_hung_uninterruptible_tasks kernel/hung_task.c:328 [inline]
watchdog+0xf0e/0x1260 kernel/hung_task.c:491
kthread+0x3c2/0x780 kernel/kthread.c:463
ret_from_fork+0x5d4/0x6f0 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:148
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245
</TASK>
Sending NMI from CPU 1 to CPUs 0:
NMI backtrace for cpu 0
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 12 Comm: kworker/u8:0 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full)
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/12/2025
Workqueue: events_unbound toggle_allocation_gate
RIP: 0010:__bfs+0x1ba/0x290 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1815
Code: 01 15 44 29 cb 81 e3 ff 0f 00 00 39 1d df f5 45 14 48 89 04 f5 00 6a 98 96 73 0c 89 1d cf f5 45 14 eb 04 4c 89 78 30 48 8b 00 <4c> 39 c0 75 f4 e9 2b ff ff ff b8 01 00 00 00 48 83 c4 28 5b 5d 41
RSP: 0018:ffffc90000117300 EFLAGS: 00000006
RAX: ffffffff9770e2a8 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 0000000000000001
RDX: 0000000000000111 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffffc900001173c0
RBP: 0000000000000030 R08: ffffffff95dd9b90 R09: 0000000000000001
R10: ffffc900001174a0 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffffff81974ec0
R13: ffffc900001173a0 R14: ffffffff819759d0 R15: ffffc900001173c0
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8881246b6000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000555593ff75c8 CR3: 000000000e380000 CR4: 00000000003526f0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__bfs_backwards kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1860 [inline]
check_irq_usage+0xcb/0x920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2796
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3169 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3284 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3908 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x12bc/0x1ce0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5237
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x179/0x350 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
__raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3a/0x60 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162
lock_hrtimer_base kernel/time/hrtimer.c:171 [inline]
hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0xa9/0x2f0 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1362
update_curr_dl_se+0x42c/0xa10 kernel/sched/deadline.c:1468
update_curr+0x3fb/0x550 kernel/sched/fair.c:1243
pick_task_fair+0x171/0x330 kernel/sched/fair.c:8753
pick_next_task_fair+0x20/0x1010 kernel/sched/fair.c:8778
__pick_next_task+0xf1/0x6c0 kernel/sched/core.c:6001
pick_next_task kernel/sched/core.c:6099 [inline]
__schedule+0x5d3/0x5de0 kernel/sched/core.c:6902
preempt_schedule_common+0x44/0xc0 kernel/sched/core.c:7145
preempt_schedule_thunk+0x16/0x30 arch/x86/entry/thunk.S:12
on_each_cpu_cond_mask+0x75/0x90 kernel/smp.c:1045
on_each_cpu include/linux/smp.h:71 [inline]
smp_text_poke_sync_each_cpu arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c:2653 [inline]
smp_text_poke_batch_finish+0x7b4/0xdb0 arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c:2946
arch_jump_label_transform_apply+0x1c/0x30 arch/x86/kernel/jump_label.c:146
jump_label_update+0x376/0x550 kernel/jump_label.c:919
static_key_enable_cpuslocked+0x1b7/0x270 kernel/jump_label.c:210
static_key_enable+0x1a/0x20 kernel/jump_label.c:223
toggle_allocation_gate mm/kfence/core.c:850 [inline]
toggle_allocation_gate+0xfa/0x280 mm/kfence/core.c:842
process_one_work+0x9cc/0x1b70 kernel/workqueue.c:3236
process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:3319 [inline]
worker_thread+0x6c8/0xf10 kernel/workqueue.c:3400
kthread+0x3c2/0x780 kernel/kthread.c:463
ret_from_fork+0x5d4/0x6f0 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:148
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245
</TASK>
Tested on:
commit: d69eb204 Merge tag 'net-6.17-rc5' of git://git.kernel...
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1551b162580000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=d4703ac89d9e185a
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=b73c7d94a151e2ee1e9b
compiler: gcc (Debian 12.2.0-14+deb12u1) 12.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
patch: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/patch.diff?x=13dd1312580000
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] netfs: Prevent duplicate unlocking
2025-09-04 17:48 [syzbot] [netfs?] kernel BUG in netfs_perform_write syzbot
2025-09-05 0:46 ` Forwarded: " syzbot
@ 2025-09-05 1:59 ` Lizhi Xu
2025-09-08 2:34 ` Paulo Alcantara
` (2 more replies)
1 sibling, 3 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Lizhi Xu @ 2025-09-05 1:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: syzbot+b73c7d94a151e2ee1e9b
Cc: dhowells, linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel, netfs, pc, syzkaller-bugs
The filio lock has been released here, so there is no need to jump to
error_folio_unlock to release it again.
Reported-by: syzbot+b73c7d94a151e2ee1e9b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=b73c7d94a151e2ee1e9b
Signed-off-by: Lizhi Xu <lizhi.xu@windriver.com>
---
fs/netfs/buffered_write.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/netfs/buffered_write.c b/fs/netfs/buffered_write.c
index f27ea5099a68..09394ac2c180 100644
--- a/fs/netfs/buffered_write.c
+++ b/fs/netfs/buffered_write.c
@@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ ssize_t netfs_perform_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
folio_put(folio);
ret = filemap_write_and_wait_range(mapping, fpos, fpos + flen - 1);
if (ret < 0)
- goto error_folio_unlock;
+ goto out;
continue;
copied:
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] netfs: Prevent duplicate unlocking
2025-09-05 1:59 ` [PATCH] netfs: Prevent duplicate unlocking Lizhi Xu
@ 2025-09-08 2:34 ` Paulo Alcantara
2025-09-08 9:57 ` David Howells
2025-09-15 11:58 ` Christian Brauner
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Paulo Alcantara @ 2025-09-08 2:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lizhi Xu, syzbot+b73c7d94a151e2ee1e9b
Cc: dhowells, linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel, netfs, syzkaller-bugs
Lizhi Xu <lizhi.xu@windriver.com> writes:
> The filio lock has been released here, so there is no need to jump to
^ s/filio/folio/
> error_folio_unlock to release it again.
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+b73c7d94a151e2ee1e9b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=b73c7d94a151e2ee1e9b
> Signed-off-by: Lizhi Xu <lizhi.xu@windriver.com>
> ---
> fs/netfs/buffered_write.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara (Red Hat) <pc@manguebit.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] netfs: Prevent duplicate unlocking
2025-09-05 1:59 ` [PATCH] netfs: Prevent duplicate unlocking Lizhi Xu
2025-09-08 2:34 ` Paulo Alcantara
@ 2025-09-08 9:57 ` David Howells
2025-09-15 11:58 ` Christian Brauner
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: David Howells @ 2025-09-08 9:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Brauner
Cc: dhowells, Lizhi Xu, syzbot+b73c7d94a151e2ee1e9b, linux-fsdevel,
linux-kernel, netfs, pc, syzkaller-bugs
Hi Christian,
Can you pick this up and add:
Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Thanks,
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] netfs: Prevent duplicate unlocking
2025-09-05 1:59 ` [PATCH] netfs: Prevent duplicate unlocking Lizhi Xu
2025-09-08 2:34 ` Paulo Alcantara
2025-09-08 9:57 ` David Howells
@ 2025-09-15 11:58 ` Christian Brauner
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Christian Brauner @ 2025-09-15 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: syzbot+b73c7d94a151e2ee1e9b, Lizhi Xu
Cc: Christian Brauner, dhowells, linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel, netfs,
pc, syzkaller-bugs
On Fri, 05 Sep 2025 09:59:25 +0800, Lizhi Xu wrote:
> The filio lock has been released here, so there is no need to jump to
> error_folio_unlock to release it again.
>
>
Applied to the vfs.fixes branch of the vfs/vfs.git tree.
Patches in the vfs.fixes branch should appear in linux-next soon.
Please report any outstanding bugs that were missed during review in a
new review to the original patch series allowing us to drop it.
It's encouraged to provide Acked-bys and Reviewed-bys even though the
patch has now been applied. If possible patch trailers will be updated.
Note that commit hashes shown below are subject to change due to rebase,
trailer updates or similar. If in doubt, please check the listed branch.
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git
branch: vfs.fixes
[1/1] netfs: Prevent duplicate unlocking
https://git.kernel.org/vfs/vfs/c/66d938e89e94
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-09-15 11:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-09-04 17:48 [syzbot] [netfs?] kernel BUG in netfs_perform_write syzbot
2025-09-05 0:46 ` Forwarded: " syzbot
2025-09-05 1:59 ` [PATCH] netfs: Prevent duplicate unlocking Lizhi Xu
2025-09-08 2:34 ` Paulo Alcantara
2025-09-08 9:57 ` David Howells
2025-09-15 11:58 ` Christian Brauner
[not found] <20250905004621.1849126-1-lizhi.xu@windriver.com>
2025-09-05 1:27 ` [syzbot] [netfs?] kernel BUG in netfs_perform_write syzbot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox