From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Gui-Dong Han <hanguidong02@gmail.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Georgi Djakov <djakov@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com>,
Wang Jiayue <akaieurus@gmail.com>, Yao Zi <me@ziyao.cc>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] interconnect: debugfs: fix devm_kstrdup and kfree mismatch
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2026 10:34:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <68f0613c-321a-45cd-abf7-76e59159d9c5@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260318024815.7655-1-hanguidong02@gmail.com>
> debugfs_write_file_str() uses standard kfree() to release old strings.
Why would such information matter here?
> Initializing src_node and dst_node with devm_kstrdup() creates a memory
> management mismatch. If a user writes to these debugfs nodes, the
> devm-allocated memory is freed via kfree(), leaving a dangling pointer
> in the device resource list that can lead to a double free.
Would an other description approach be clearer for involved dependencies?
> Fix this by using standard kstrdup() instead.
Interesting …
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.0-rc4/source/drivers/interconnect/debugfs-client.c#L139-L169
> Since the interconnect
> subsystem is strictly built-in and cannot be unloaded as a module, there
> is no exit path requiring manual cleanup of these strings.
Should string lifetimes be reconsidered for the mentioned function implementation?
> The error
> handling path is also simplified by taking advantage of the fact that
> kfree(NULL) is a safe no-op.
I tend to interpret source code simplifications in other directions.
See also once more:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst?h=v7.0-rc4#n34
Regards,
Markus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-22 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-18 2:48 [PATCH] interconnect: debugfs: fix devm_kstrdup and kfree mismatch Gui-Dong Han
2026-03-18 4:26 ` Kuan-Wei Chiu
2026-03-22 9:34 ` Markus Elfring [this message]
2026-04-02 15:42 ` Gui-Dong Han
2026-04-02 16:00 ` Georgi Djakov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=68f0613c-321a-45cd-abf7-76e59159d9c5@web.de \
--to=markus.elfring@web.de \
--cc=akaieurus@gmail.com \
--cc=djakov@kernel.org \
--cc=hanguidong02@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@ziyao.cc \
--cc=visitorckw@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox