public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Antonio Vargas <windenntw@gmail.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Ian Romanick <idr@us.ibm.com>, Allen Akin <akin@pobox.com>,
	Discuss issues related to the xorg tree 
	<xorg@lists.freedesktop.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: State of Linux graphics
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 15:57:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <69304d110509010657d397a6f@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1125570042.15768.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On 9/1/05, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> On Iau, 2005-09-01 at 08:00 +0200, Antonio Vargas wrote:
> > 2. whole screen z-buffer, for depth comparison between the pixels
> > generated from each window.
> 
> That one I question in part - if the rectangles are (as is typically the
> case) large then the Z buffer just ups the memory accesses. I guess for
> round windows it might be handy.
> 

There are multiple ways to enhance the speed for zbuffer:

1. Use an hierarchical z-buffer

Divide the screen in 16x16 pixel tiles, and then a per-tile minimum
value. When rendering a poly, you first check the tile-z against the
poly-z and if it fails you can skip 256 pixels in one go.

2. Use scanline-major rendering:

for_each_scanline{
  clear_z_for_scanline();
  for_each_polygon{
    draw_pixels_for_current_polygon_and scanline();
  }
}

This is easily done by modeling the scanliner with a coroutine for each polygon
to be painted. The zbuffer is reduced to a scanline and is reused for
all scanlines,
so it's rather fast :)

-- 
Greetz, Antonio Vargas aka winden of network

http://wind.codepixel.com/

Las cosas no son lo que parecen, excepto cuando parecen lo que si son.

  reply	other threads:[~2005-09-01 13:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-30 16:03 State of Linux graphics Jon Smirl
2005-08-30 17:26 ` David Reveman
2005-08-30 18:13   ` Jon Smirl
2005-08-30 22:38   ` Dave Airlie
2005-08-31  6:33   ` Allen Akin
2005-08-31  8:11     ` Anshuman Gholap
2005-08-31 17:20     ` David Reveman
2005-08-31 17:48     ` Jim Gettys
2005-08-31 18:23       ` Jon Smirl
2005-08-31 19:06       ` Allen Akin
2005-08-31 19:14         ` Jim Gettys
2005-08-31 18:29     ` Keith Packard
2005-08-31 20:06       ` Allen Akin
2005-08-31 20:20         ` Ian Romanick
2005-09-01  1:04           ` James Cloos
2005-08-31 21:06         ` Keith Packard
2005-09-01  1:58           ` Allen Akin
2005-09-01  3:11             ` Ian Romanick
2005-09-01  6:00               ` Antonio Vargas
2005-09-01 10:20                 ` Alan Cox
2005-09-01 13:57                   ` Antonio Vargas [this message]
2005-09-01  6:11               ` Allen Akin
2005-09-01  3:59             ` Keith Packard
2005-09-01 15:24               ` Brian Paul
2005-09-01 15:59                 ` Jim Gettys
2005-09-01 16:39                   ` Andreas Hauser
2005-09-01 20:18                     ` Jim Gettys
2005-09-01 20:38                       ` Jon Smirl
2005-09-01 21:29                         ` Sean
2005-09-01 16:09                 ` Alan Cox
2005-09-01 16:04                   ` Brian Paul
2005-09-01 17:21                     ` Ian Romanick
2005-09-01 17:26                       ` Keith Whitwell
2005-09-01 20:03               ` Allen Akin
2005-08-31  3:11 ` Daniel Stone
2005-08-31  4:29   ` Jon Smirl
2005-08-31  4:50   ` Jon Smirl
     [not found]     ` <1125464500.8730.68.camel@localhost.localdomain>
2005-08-31  5:17       ` Jon Smirl
2005-08-31  5:23       ` Jon Smirl
2005-08-31  5:40         ` Jon Smirl
2005-08-31  6:15 ` Eric Anholt
2005-08-31 13:38   ` Jon Smirl
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-09-02  2:44 rep stsb
2005-09-03  4:00 mcartoaje

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=69304d110509010657d397a6f@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=windenntw@gmail.com \
    --cc=akin@pobox.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=idr@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xorg@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox