public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Alejandro Lucero Palau <alucerop@amd.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>, <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com>,
	<alison.schofield@intel.com>, <terry.bowman@amd.com>,
	<alejandro.lucero-palau@amd.com>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	<Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>, Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] cxl/mem: Fix devm_cxl_memdev_edac_release() confusion
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 13:11:25 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6940797de4c26_1cee1004e@dwillia2-mobl4.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5bd14207-cc7c-4fec-8340-e8a98330d628@amd.com>

Alejandro Lucero Palau wrote:
> 
> On 12/4/25 02:21, Dan Williams wrote:
> > A device release method is only for undoing allocations on the path to
> > preparing the device for device_add(). In contrast, devm allocations are
> 
> 
> Should this not be referencing to device_del() instead?

No, device_del() is not involved in what this patch is addressing. Prior
to device_add() the container of that device is allocated and acquires
some resources. device_add() and device_del() are only registering /
unregistering the device with the device-core. The release method undoes
any resource acquisition done *prior* to device_add().

  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-15 21:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-04  2:21 [PATCH 0/6] cxl: Initialization reworks in support Soft Reserve Recovery and Accelerator Memory Dan Williams
2025-12-04  2:21 ` [PATCH 1/6] cxl/mem: Fix devm_cxl_memdev_edac_release() confusion Dan Williams
2025-12-04 16:48   ` Dave Jiang
2025-12-04 20:15     ` dan.j.williams
2025-12-04 19:09   ` Cheatham, Benjamin
2025-12-05  2:46   ` Alison Schofield
2025-12-08 14:19   ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2025-12-15 21:11     ` dan.j.williams [this message]
2025-12-08 19:20   ` Shiju Jose
2025-12-15 12:00   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-04  2:21 ` [PATCH 2/6] cxl/mem: Arrange for always-synchronous memdev attach Dan Williams
2025-12-04 16:58   ` Dave Jiang
2025-12-04 19:09   ` Cheatham, Benjamin
2025-12-05  2:49   ` Alison Schofield
2025-12-15 12:08   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-04  2:21 ` [PATCH 3/6] cxl/port: Arrange for always synchronous endpoint attach Dan Williams
2025-12-04 18:36   ` Dave Jiang
2025-12-04 19:09   ` Cheatham, Benjamin
2025-12-05  3:36   ` Alison Schofield
2025-12-15 12:09   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-04  2:21 ` [PATCH 4/6] cxl/mem: Convert devm_cxl_add_memdev() to scope-based-cleanup Dan Williams
2025-12-04 18:58   ` Dave Jiang
2025-12-04 19:09   ` Cheatham, Benjamin
2025-12-04 20:50     ` dan.j.williams
2025-12-05  3:37   ` Alison Schofield
2025-12-04  2:21 ` [PATCH 5/6] cxl/mem: Drop @host argument to devm_cxl_add_memdev() Dan Williams
2025-12-04 19:09   ` Cheatham, Benjamin
2025-12-04 20:02   ` Dave Jiang
2025-12-05  3:38   ` Alison Schofield
2025-12-15 12:15   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-04  2:21 ` [PATCH 6/6] cxl/mem: Introduce a memdev creation ->probe() operation Dan Williams
2025-12-04 19:10   ` Cheatham, Benjamin
2025-12-04 21:11     ` dan.j.williams
2025-12-04 22:02       ` dan.j.williams
2025-12-04 22:15         ` Cheatham, Benjamin
2025-12-04 20:03   ` Dave Jiang
2025-12-05 15:15 ` [PATCH 0/6] cxl: Initialization reworks in support Soft Reserve Recovery and Accelerator Memory Alejandro Lucero Palau
2025-12-05 21:17   ` dan.j.williams
2025-12-08 14:04     ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2025-12-09  7:53       ` dan.j.williams
2025-12-08 17:04 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2025-12-15 23:29   ` dan.j.williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6940797de4c26_1cee1004e@dwillia2-mobl4.notmuch \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com \
    --cc=alejandro.lucero-palau@amd.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=alucerop@amd.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shiju.jose@huawei.com \
    --cc=terry.bowman@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox