From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:24:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:24:43 -0500 Received: from mail.isolate.net ([12.46.185.253]:9745 "HELO isolate.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:24:42 -0500 Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:33:12 -0500 From: shuz@isolate.net X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.61) UNREG / CD5BF9353B3B7091 Reply-To: shuz@isolate.net X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <69415931157.20030113113312@isolate.net> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: kernel: KERNEL: assertion (newsk->state != TCP_SYN_RECV) failed at tcp.c(2229) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, First let me apologize if this doesn't belong on the list, I wasn't sure where to ask and I want to make sure this is a non-fatal error (100% of the time). www1 is a Dual PIII 733, 1G ram, eepro100 network card. gets around 15-35mbits of traffic. www3 is a Dual P3 1GHZ with 1G ram, and also an eepro100 network card. load balanced with www1, 15-35mbits of traffic. around 5 days ago I updated to 2.4.20 (from 2.4.18) and noticed these kernel (errors?) this morning at around the same time on each server. Jan 13 09:12:38 www1 kernel: KERNEL: assertion (newsk->state != TCP_SYN_RECV) failed at tcp.c(2229) Jan 13 09:12:38 www1 kernel: KERNEL: assertion ((1<state)&(TCPF_ESTABLISHED|TCPF_CLOSE_WAIT|TCPF_CLOSE)) failed at af_inet.c(689) Jan 13 09:08:44 www3 kernel: KERNEL: assertion (newsk->state != TCP_SYN_RECV) failed at tcp.c(2229) Jan 13 09:08:44 www3 kernel: KERNEL: assertion ((1<state)&(TCPF_ESTABLISHED|TCPF_CLOSE_WAIT|TCPF_CLOSE)) failed at af_inet.c(689) if someone could please provide insight on exactly what is happening when this happens, it would be greatly appreciated. are there any side effects? is this a kernel bug? if you need more information please let me know. Thanks, Mike