From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, vgoyal@redhat.com, horms@verge.net.au,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86 e820: Introduce memmap=resetusablemap for kdump usage
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 02:05:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6950516.1uefDuthAH@hammer82.arch.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE9FiQWXcwagEb0jdFfdHvNcByNxtaLbvvoRC-jAppQmiGS22w@mail.gmail.com>
On Wednesday, January 23, 2013 08:07:19 PM Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 8:32 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> >>> Again: Please explain what is bad with this solution.
> >>> I cannot see a better and more robust way for kdump other than
> >>> reserving the original reserved memory areas as declared by the BIOS.
> >>
> >> It is bad because it creates more complexity than is needed.
> >>
> >> The whole point is that what we want is simply to switch type 1 to type
> >> X, with the sole exceptions being the areas explicitly reserved for the
> >> kdump kernel.
> >
> > Do you prefer to "reserveram" way in attached patch?
>
> Hi, Thomas,
>
> Can you please check attached reserveram version on your setup?
>
> If it is ok, i will put it in for-x86-boot patchset and send it to
> Peter for v3.9.
But this (converting usable memory to reserved one before usable kdump memory
is added) will let machines run into problems again for which the check:
"mmconf area must be in reserved memory" got added?
If, then memory which was usable before has to be converted to a special
E820_KUMP (or whatever type) to make sure existing checks which look for
"is reserved memory" still work the same way as in a productive kernel.
Advantage of this would be that the info what originally was usable
memory is preserved and can be used in future kdump related patches.
So I guess the final patch should be:
- Add a new e820 type:
E820_KDUMP_RESERVED /* Originally usable memory where the crashed
kernel kernel resided in */
- Use Yinghai's last posted patch, but instead of:
+ e820_update_range(0, ULLONG_MAX, E820_RAM,
+ E820_RESERVED);
...
+ e820_remove_range(start_at, mem_size, E820_RESERVED, 0);
do:
+ e820_update_range(0, ULLONG_MAX, E820_RAM,
+ E820_KDUMP_RESERVED);
...
+ e820_remove_range(start_at, mem_size, E820_KDUMP_RESERVED, 0);
- Come up with another memmap=kdump_reserve_ram memmap option name
or however it should get named...
If this proposal gets accepted, I can send a tested patch...
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-29 1:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-22 15:20 [PATCH 0/2] Only parse exactmap once, introduce memmap=resetusablemap Thomas Renninger
2013-01-22 15:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86 e820: Check for exactmap appearance when parsing first memmap option Thomas Renninger
2013-01-22 19:33 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-29 1:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-01-29 2:01 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-22 15:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86 e820: Introduce memmap=resetusablemap for kdump usage Thomas Renninger
2013-01-22 15:54 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-01-22 16:23 ` Thomas Renninger
2013-01-22 16:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-01-22 20:06 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-24 4:07 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-29 1:05 ` Thomas Renninger [this message]
2013-01-29 1:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-01-29 2:10 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-29 2:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-01-29 2:19 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-29 2:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-01-29 2:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-01-29 2:31 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-29 3:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-01-29 9:47 ` Thomas Renninger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6950516.1uefDuthAH@hammer82.arch.suse.de \
--to=trenn@suse.de \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox