public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, vgoyal@redhat.com, horms@verge.net.au,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86 e820: Introduce memmap=resetusablemap for kdump usage
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 02:05:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6950516.1uefDuthAH@hammer82.arch.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE9FiQWXcwagEb0jdFfdHvNcByNxtaLbvvoRC-jAppQmiGS22w@mail.gmail.com>

On Wednesday, January 23, 2013 08:07:19 PM Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 8:32 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> >>> Again: Please explain what is bad with this solution.
> >>> I cannot see a better and more robust way for kdump other than
> >>> reserving the original reserved memory areas as declared by the BIOS.
> >> 
> >> It is bad because it creates more complexity than is needed.
> >> 
> >> The whole point is that what we want is simply to switch type 1 to type
> >> X, with the sole exceptions being the areas explicitly reserved for the
> >> kdump kernel.
> > 
> > Do you prefer to  "reserveram" way in attached patch?
> 
> Hi, Thomas,
> 
> Can you please check attached reserveram version on your setup?
> 
> If it is ok, i will put it in for-x86-boot patchset and send it to
> Peter for v3.9.

But this (converting usable memory to reserved one before usable kdump memory
is added) will let machines run into problems again for which the check:
"mmconf area must be in reserved memory" got added?

If, then memory which was usable before has to be converted to a special
E820_KUMP (or whatever type) to make sure existing checks which look for
"is reserved memory" still work the same way as in a productive kernel.

Advantage of this would be that the info what originally was usable
memory is preserved and can be used in future kdump related patches.

So I guess the final patch should be:
   - Add a new e820 type:
        E820_KDUMP_RESERVED /* Originally usable memory where the crashed
                                                    kernel kernel resided in */
  - Use Yinghai's last posted patch, but instead of:
+			e820_update_range(0, ULLONG_MAX, E820_RAM,
+					  E820_RESERVED);
...
+			e820_remove_range(start_at, mem_size, E820_RESERVED, 0);
do:
+			e820_update_range(0, ULLONG_MAX, E820_RAM,
+					  E820_KDUMP_RESERVED);
...
+			e820_remove_range(start_at, mem_size, E820_KDUMP_RESERVED, 0);

  - Come up with another memmap=kdump_reserve_ram memmap option name
    or however it should get named...

If this proposal gets accepted, I can send a tested patch...

       Thomas

  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-29  1:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-22 15:20 [PATCH 0/2] Only parse exactmap once, introduce memmap=resetusablemap Thomas Renninger
2013-01-22 15:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86 e820: Check for exactmap appearance when parsing first memmap option Thomas Renninger
2013-01-22 19:33   ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-29  1:09   ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-01-29  2:01     ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-22 15:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86 e820: Introduce memmap=resetusablemap for kdump usage Thomas Renninger
2013-01-22 15:54   ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-01-22 16:23     ` Thomas Renninger
2013-01-22 16:32       ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-01-22 20:06         ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-24  4:07           ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-29  1:05             ` Thomas Renninger [this message]
2013-01-29  1:11               ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-01-29  2:10                 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-29  2:11                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-01-29  2:19                     ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-29  2:20                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-01-29  2:27                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-01-29  2:31                         ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-29  3:33                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-01-29  9:47                   ` Thomas Renninger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6950516.1uefDuthAH@hammer82.arch.suse.de \
    --to=trenn@suse.de \
    --cc=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox