public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
To: Neeraj Kumar <s.neeraj@samsung.com>, <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>,
	<nvdimm@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<gost.dev@samsung.com>
Cc: <a.manzanares@samsung.com>, <vishak.g@samsung.com>,
	<neeraj.kernel@gmail.com>, Neeraj Kumar <s.neeraj@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 04/17] nvdimm/label: Include region label in slot validation
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 15:20:09 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <69680889b4a78_1183cf100e@iweiny-mobl.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260109124437.4025893-5-s.neeraj@samsung.com>

Neeraj Kumar wrote:
> Prior to LSA 2.1 Support, label in slot means only namespace
> label. But with LSA 2.1 a label can be either namespace or
> region label.
> 
> Slot validation routine validates label slot by calculating
> label checksum. It was only validating namespace label.
> This changeset also validates region label if present.
> 
> In previous patch to_lsa_label() was introduced along with
> to_label(). to_label() returns only namespace label whereas
> to_lsa_label() returns union nd_lsa_label*
> 
> In this patch We have converted all usage of to_label()

NIT: don't use 'We'

> to to_lsa_label()
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Kumar <s.neeraj@samsung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/nvdimm/label.c | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/label.c b/drivers/nvdimm/label.c
> index 17e2a1f5a6da..9854cb45fb62 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/label.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/label.c
> @@ -312,16 +312,6 @@ static union nd_lsa_label *to_lsa_label(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd, int slot)
>  	return (union nd_lsa_label *) label;
>  }
>  
> -static struct nd_namespace_label *to_label(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd, int slot)
> -{
> -	unsigned long label, base;
> -
> -	base = (unsigned long) nd_label_base(ndd);
> -	label = base + sizeof_namespace_label(ndd) * slot;
> -
> -	return (struct nd_namespace_label *) label;
> -}
> -
>  #define for_each_clear_bit_le(bit, addr, size) \
>  	for ((bit) = find_next_zero_bit_le((addr), (size), 0);  \
>  	     (bit) < (size);                                    \
> @@ -382,7 +372,7 @@ static bool nsl_validate_checksum(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd,
>  {
>  	u64 sum, sum_save;
>  
> -	if (!ndd->cxl && !efi_namespace_label_has(ndd, checksum))
> +	if (!efi_namespace_label_has(ndd, checksum))

What does this change have to do with region label validation during slot
validation?

>  		return true;
>  
>  	sum_save = nsl_get_checksum(ndd, nd_label);
> @@ -397,13 +387,25 @@ static void nsl_calculate_checksum(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd,
>  {
>  	u64 sum;
>  
> -	if (!ndd->cxl && !efi_namespace_label_has(ndd, checksum))
> +	if (!efi_namespace_label_has(ndd, checksum))

This and the above seem like cleanups because efi_namespace_label_has()
already checks !ndd->cxl?  Was that the intent?  Perhaps as a separate
cleanup?

Rest of the patch looks reasonable,
Ira

>  		return;
>  	nsl_set_checksum(ndd, nd_label, 0);
>  	sum = nd_fletcher64(nd_label, sizeof_namespace_label(ndd), 1);
>  	nsl_set_checksum(ndd, nd_label, sum);
>  }
>  
> +static bool region_label_validate_checksum(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd,
> +				struct cxl_region_label *region_label)
> +{
> +	u64 sum, sum_save;
> +
> +	sum_save = __le64_to_cpu(region_label->checksum);
> +	region_label->checksum = __cpu_to_le64(0);
> +	sum = nd_fletcher64(region_label, sizeof_namespace_label(ndd), 1);
> +	region_label->checksum = __cpu_to_le64(sum_save);
> +	return sum == sum_save;
> +}
> +
>  static void region_label_calculate_checksum(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd,
>  				   struct cxl_region_label *region_label)
>  {
> @@ -415,16 +417,34 @@ static void region_label_calculate_checksum(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd,
>  }
>  
>  static bool slot_valid(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd,
> -		struct nd_namespace_label *nd_label, u32 slot)
> +		       union nd_lsa_label *lsa_label, u32 slot)
>  {
> +	struct cxl_region_label *region_label = &lsa_label->region_label;
> +	struct nd_namespace_label *nd_label = &lsa_label->ns_label;
> +	enum label_type type;
>  	bool valid;
> +	static const char * const label_name[] = {
> +		[RG_LABEL_TYPE] = "region",
> +		[NS_LABEL_TYPE] = "namespace",
> +	};
>  
>  	/* check that we are written where we expect to be written */
> -	if (slot != nsl_get_slot(ndd, nd_label))
> -		return false;
> -	valid = nsl_validate_checksum(ndd, nd_label);
> +	if (is_region_label(ndd, lsa_label)) {
> +		type = RG_LABEL_TYPE;
> +		if (slot != __le32_to_cpu(region_label->slot))
> +			return false;
> +		valid = region_label_validate_checksum(ndd, region_label);
> +	} else {
> +		type = NS_LABEL_TYPE;
> +		if (slot != nsl_get_slot(ndd, nd_label))
> +			return false;
> +		valid = nsl_validate_checksum(ndd, nd_label);
> +	}
> +
>  	if (!valid)
> -		dev_dbg(ndd->dev, "fail checksum. slot: %d\n", slot);
> +		dev_dbg(ndd->dev, "%s label checksum fail. slot: %d\n",
> +			label_name[type], slot);
> +
>  	return valid;
>  }
>  
> @@ -440,14 +460,16 @@ int nd_label_reserve_dpa(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd)
>  	for_each_clear_bit_le(slot, free, nslot) {
>  		struct nd_namespace_label *nd_label;
>  		struct nd_region *nd_region = NULL;
> +		union nd_lsa_label *lsa_label;
>  		struct nd_label_id label_id;
>  		struct resource *res;
>  		uuid_t label_uuid;
>  		u32 flags;
>  
> -		nd_label = to_label(ndd, slot);
> +		lsa_label = to_lsa_label(ndd, slot);
> +		nd_label = &lsa_label->ns_label;
>  
> -		if (!slot_valid(ndd, nd_label, slot))
> +		if (!slot_valid(ndd, lsa_label, slot))
>  			continue;
>  
>  		nsl_get_uuid(ndd, nd_label, &label_uuid);
> @@ -598,18 +620,30 @@ int nd_label_active_count(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd)
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	for_each_clear_bit_le(slot, free, nslot) {
> +		struct cxl_region_label *region_label;
>  		struct nd_namespace_label *nd_label;
> -
> -		nd_label = to_label(ndd, slot);
> -
> -		if (!slot_valid(ndd, nd_label, slot)) {
> -			u32 label_slot = nsl_get_slot(ndd, nd_label);
> -			u64 size = nsl_get_rawsize(ndd, nd_label);
> -			u64 dpa = nsl_get_dpa(ndd, nd_label);
> +		union nd_lsa_label *lsa_label;
> +		u32 lslot;
> +		u64 size, dpa;
> +
> +		lsa_label = to_lsa_label(ndd, slot);
> +		nd_label = &lsa_label->ns_label;
> +		region_label = &lsa_label->region_label;
> +
> +		if (!slot_valid(ndd, lsa_label, slot)) {
> +			if (is_region_label(ndd, lsa_label)) {
> +				lslot = __le32_to_cpu(region_label->slot);
> +				size = __le64_to_cpu(region_label->rawsize);
> +				dpa = __le64_to_cpu(region_label->dpa);
> +			} else {
> +				lslot = nsl_get_slot(ndd, nd_label);
> +				size = nsl_get_rawsize(ndd, nd_label);
> +				dpa = nsl_get_dpa(ndd, nd_label);
> +			}
>  
>  			dev_dbg(ndd->dev,
>  				"slot%d invalid slot: %d dpa: %llx size: %llx\n",
> -					slot, label_slot, dpa, size);
> +					slot, lslot, dpa, size);
>  			continue;
>  		}
>  		count++;
> @@ -627,10 +661,10 @@ union nd_lsa_label *nd_label_active(struct nvdimm_drvdata *ndd, int n)
>  		return NULL;
>  
>  	for_each_clear_bit_le(slot, free, nslot) {
> -		struct nd_namespace_label *nd_label;
> +		union nd_lsa_label *lsa_label;
>  
> -		nd_label = to_label(ndd, slot);
> -		if (!slot_valid(ndd, nd_label, slot))
> +		lsa_label = to_lsa_label(ndd, slot);
> +		if (!slot_valid(ndd, lsa_label, slot))
>  			continue;
>  
>  		if (n-- == 0)
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-14 21:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20260109124454epcas5p4513168fdb4253ef1c5ac1656985417fd@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2026-01-09 12:44 ` [PATCH V5 00/17] Add CXL LSA 2.1 format support in nvdimm and cxl pmem Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-09 12:44   ` [PATCH V5 01/17] nvdimm/label: Introduce NDD_REGION_LABELING flag to set region label Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-14 21:22     ` Ira Weiny
2026-01-09 12:44   ` [PATCH V5 02/17] nvdimm/label: CXL labels skip the need for 'interleave-set cookie' Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-09 12:44   ` [PATCH V5 03/17] nvdimm/label: Add namespace/region label support as per LSA 2.1 Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-15 17:45     ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-23 10:57       ` Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-21  0:35     ` Ira Weiny
2026-01-09 12:44   ` [PATCH V5 04/17] nvdimm/label: Include region label in slot validation Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-14 21:20     ` Ira Weiny [this message]
2026-01-23 11:02       ` Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-15 17:55     ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-21  0:38     ` Ira Weiny
2026-01-09 12:44   ` [PATCH V5 05/17] nvdimm/label: Skip region label during ns label DPA reservation Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-15 17:56     ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-21  0:41     ` Ira Weiny
2026-01-23 11:05       ` Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-09 12:44   ` [PATCH V5 06/17] nvdimm/label: Preserve region label during namespace creation Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-15 17:59     ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-21  0:43     ` Ira Weiny
2026-01-09 12:44   ` [PATCH V5 07/17] nvdimm/label: Add region label delete support Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-21  0:44     ` Ira Weiny
2026-01-09 12:44   ` [PATCH V5 08/17] nvdimm/label: Preserve cxl region information from region label Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-15 18:03     ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-23 11:08       ` Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-21  0:45     ` Ira Weiny
2026-01-09 12:44   ` [PATCH V5 09/17] nvdimm/label: Export routine to fetch region information Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-15 18:03     ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-21  0:46     ` Ira Weiny
2026-01-23 11:11       ` Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-23 11:20       ` Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-09 12:44   ` [PATCH V5 10/17] cxl/mem: Refactor cxl pmem region auto-assembling Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-15 18:08     ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-23 11:14       ` Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-09 12:44   ` [PATCH V5 11/17] cxl/region: Add devm_cxl_pmem_add_region() for pmem region creation Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-15 18:17     ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-23 11:17       ` Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-09 12:44   ` [PATCH V5 12/17] cxl/pmem: Preserve region information into nd_set Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-15 18:18     ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-09 12:44   ` [PATCH V5 13/17] cxl/pmem_region: Prep patch to accommodate pmem_region attributes Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-09 12:44   ` [PATCH V5 14/17] cxl/pmem_region: Introduce CONFIG_CXL_PMEM_REGION for core/pmem_region.c Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-15 18:19     ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-09 12:44   ` [PATCH V5 15/17] cxl/pmem_region: Add sysfs attribute cxl region label updation/deletion Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-14 17:00     ` Dave Jiang
2026-01-23 11:22       ` Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-15 18:21     ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-23 11:25       ` Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-09 12:44   ` [PATCH V5 16/17] cxl/pmem_region: Create pmem region using information parsed from LSA Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-15 18:28     ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-23 11:28       ` Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-09 12:44   ` [PATCH V5 17/17] cxl/pmem: Add CXL LSA 2.1 support in cxl pmem Neeraj Kumar
2026-01-15 18:29     ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-21 15:37   ` [PATCH V5 00/17] Add CXL LSA 2.1 format support in nvdimm and " Dave Jiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=69680889b4a78_1183cf100e@iweiny-mobl.notmuch \
    --to=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=a.manzanares@samsung.com \
    --cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neeraj.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=s.neeraj@samsung.com \
    --cc=vishak.g@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox