Re: [EDT][PATCH] kernel/exit.c : Fix missing read_unlock

[Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@samsung.com>]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252, Size: 1262 bytes --]

 EP-F6AA0618C49C4AEDA73BFF1B39950BAB

Hi Oleg,

>> Hi,
>>
>> From: Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@samsung.com>
>>
>> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] kernel/exit.c : Fix missing task_unlock
>>
>> This patch adds missing read_unlock if do_wait_thread or ptrace_do_wait
>> returns non zero.
>
>Confused...
>
>wait_consider_task() should drop tasklist_lock if it returns non-zero?
>
>
>> --- a/kernel/exit.c
>> +++ b/kernel/exit.c
>> @@ -1486,12 +1486,16 @@ repeat:
>>  	tsk = current;
>>  	do {
>>  		retval = do_wait_thread(wo, tsk);
>> -		if (retval)
>> +		if (retval) {
>> +			read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
>>  			goto end;
>> +		}
>>
>>  		retval = ptrace_do_wait(wo, tsk);
>> -		if (retval)
>> +		if (retval) {
>> +			read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
>>  			goto end;
>> +		}
>
>Well, the patch is obviously wrong. Because, again, tasklist_lock was
>already unlocked if (say) wait_task_zombie() reaps a child.

Yes, agree, My wrong
>If you think there is a case which forgets to unlock, please tell us
>more.
I have checked It is getting unlocked in wait_task_zombie Sorry for unnecessary disturbance. 

>Oleg.
Thanks

ÿôèº{.nÇ+‰·Ÿ®‰­†+%ŠËÿ±éݶ\x17¥Šwÿº{.nÇ+‰·¥Š{±þG«éÿŠ{ayº\x1dʇڙë,j\a­¢f£¢·hšïêÿ‘êçz_è®\x03(­éšŽŠÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?™¨è­Ú&£ø§~á¶iO•æ¬z·švØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?–I¥