The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Guopeng Zhang <guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Ridong Chen <ridong.chen@linux.dev>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Koutny <mkoutny@suse.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	Guopeng Zhang <zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] selftests/cgroup: Drop invalid boot isolation comparison
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2026 23:23:32 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <69a0e8e7-199f-4e99-aa21-0c888680a037@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260824020140.21130-2-guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>

On 8/23/26 10:01 PM, Guopeng Zhang wrote:
> From: Guopeng Zhang <zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn>
>
> check_isolcpus() clears ISOLCPUS before rebuilding it from sched domain
> data. Comparing that empty value with
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/isolated makes the test fail whenever
> isolcpus=domain is present.
>
> That sysfs file is generated from HK_TYPE_DOMAIN_BOOT and does not change
> when cpuset updates HK_TYPE_DOMAIN. Re-reading it cannot validate dynamic
> housekeeping updates. The cpuset.cpus.isolated and sched domain checks
> already cover the two dynamic interfaces, so remove the invalid comparison.
>
> This can be reproduced on a kernel booted with isolcpus=domain,15:
>
>      # tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh
>
> The test fails its first state-matrix isolation check before the change and
> continues past that check afterward.
>
> Fixes: 6df415aa46ec ("cgroup/cpuset: Defer housekeeping_update() calls from CPU hotplug to workqueue")
> Signed-off-by: Guopeng Zhang <zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn>
> ---
>   tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh | 6 ------
>   1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh
> index da8f7b920178..fdb3185570d4 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh
> @@ -797,7 +797,6 @@ check_isolcpus()
>   	EXPECTED_ISOLCPUS=$1
>   	ISCPUS=${CGROUP2}/cpuset.cpus.isolated
>   	ISOLCPUS=$(cat $ISCPUS)
> -	HKICPUS=$(cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/isolated)
>   	LASTISOLCPU=
>   	SCHED_DOMAINS=/sys/kernel/debug/sched/domains
>   	if [[ $EXPECTED_ISOLCPUS = . ]]
> @@ -835,11 +834,6 @@ check_isolcpus()
>   	ISOLCPUS=
>   	EXPECTED_ISOLCPUS=$EXPECTED_SDOMAIN
>   
> -	#
> -	# The inverse of HK_TYPE_DOMAIN cpumask in $HKICPUS should match $ISOLCPUS
> -	#
> -	[[ "$ISOLCPUS" != "$HKICPUS" ]] && return 1
> -
>   	#
>   	# Use the sched domain in debugfs to check isolated CPUs, if available
>   	#

The /sys/devices/system/cpu/isolated had recently be changed to report 
the boot time isolcpus=domain value. So the check is no longer valid and 
should be removed. Of course the position of the check is also 
problematic. So it should be removed.

Reviewed-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>


  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-24  3:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-24  2:01 [PATCH v2 0/3] cgroup/cpuset: Preserve boot-isolated CPUs on partition release Guopeng Zhang
2026-08-24  2:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] selftests/cgroup: Drop invalid boot isolation comparison Guopeng Zhang
2026-08-24  3:23   ` Waiman Long [this message]
2026-08-24  2:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] cgroup/cpuset: Preserve boot-isolated CPUs on partition release Guopeng Zhang
2026-08-24 14:17   ` Waiman Long
2026-08-24  2:01 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] selftests/cgroup: Add test for preserving boot-isolated CPUs Guopeng Zhang
2026-08-24 14:18   ` Waiman Long
2026-08-24 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] cgroup/cpuset: Preserve boot-isolated CPUs on partition release Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=69a0e8e7-199f-4e99-aa21-0c888680a037@redhat.com \
    --to=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=guopeng.zhang@linux.dev \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox