The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hongling Zeng <zhongling0719@126.com>
To: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>,
	 Hongling Zeng <zenghongling@kylinos.cn>
Cc: hyc.lee@gmail.com, charsyam@gmail.com,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ntfs: validate error codes in check_windows_hibernation_status()
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2026 16:25:00 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6A4771DC.3030301@126.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKYAXd-2nR9-=O5DYiw6x9R4KpuiV9eqH+HwiYxdAmihw4PvYw@mail.gmail.com>

Looking at ntfs_lookup_inode_by_name() more carefully:

All error return paths inside the function use hardcoded kernel errnos
(MREF_ERR(-ENOENT), MREF_ERR(-EIO), MREF_ERR(-ENOMEM)) - these are
already valid by construction.

The actual risk occurs when the function returns a "successful" MFT
reference from disk (ie->data.dir.indexed_file) that happens to have
bit 47 set - making IS_ERR_MREF() true at the caller. In this case,
MREF_ERR() extracts garbage from untrusted disk data.

This cannot be fixed inside ntfs_lookup_inode_by_name() without
changing its return value semantics, because from the function's
perspective it found a matching index entry and returned it. Only
the caller, after IS_ERR_MREF() triggers, is in a position to
validate that the extracted error code is a legitimate errno.

Restructuring the function to distinguish "real errors I generated"
from "disk data that looks like an error" would require a more
invasive API change (e.g., returning int + out-parameter), which
seems inappropriate for a legacy filesystem in maintenance mode.

在 2026年07月03日 15:06, Namjae Jeon 写道:
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2026 at 12:37 PM Hongling Zeng <zenghongling@kylinos.cn> wrote:
>> check_windows_hibernation_status() calls ntfs_lookup_inode_by_name()
>> which returns MFT references read directly from disk (untrusted data).
>> The current code extracts error codes via MREF_ERR() without proper
>> validation, allowing maliciously crafted NTFS images to trigger
>> incorrect error handling.
>>
>> The MFT reference encoding uses bit 47 as an error indicator, but the
>> lower 32 bits can contain arbitrary values. If a malicious image sets
>> the error bit with a positive integer (e.g., 1), MREF_ERR() returns
>> that positive value. This can cause the function to incorrectly
>> interpret the error as "Windows is hibernated" status, potentially
>> leading to the filesystem being mounted read-only (denial of service).
>>
>> Fix by strictly validating error codes: only accept negative values
>> in the valid errno range [-MAX_ERRNO, -1]. Convert all other values
>> (positive, zero, or out-of-range) to -EIO to indicate disk corruption.
>>
>> This prevents potential security issues and ensures proper error handling
>> for corrupted or malicious NTFS filesystems.
>>
>> Fixes: 1e9ea7e04472d ("Revert \"fs: Remove NTFS classic\"")
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Hongling Zeng <zenghongling@kylinos.cn>
> I think this should be fixed in ntfs_lookup_inode_by_name(), rather
> than in the caller.
> And I will revert your previous patch ("ntfs: validate error codes
> from untrusted disk data").
>
> Thanks.


  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-03  8:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-02  3:36 [PATCH] ntfs: validate error codes in check_windows_hibernation_status() Hongling Zeng
2026-07-03  7:06 ` Namjae Jeon
2026-07-03  8:25   ` Hongling Zeng [this message]
2026-07-03 10:40     ` Namjae Jeon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6A4771DC.3030301@126.com \
    --to=zhongling0719@126.com \
    --cc=charsyam@gmail.com \
    --cc=hyc.lee@gmail.com \
    --cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zenghongling@kylinos.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox