The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hongling Zeng <zhongling0719@126.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	 Hongling Zeng <zenghongling@kylinos.cn>
Cc: cem@kernel.org, dchinner@redhat.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix fallback data device flush for realtime inodes
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 16:59:28 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6A69C0F0.8010206@126.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <amm6-JkURolQqXDo@infradead.org>


在 2026年07月29日 16:34, Christoph Hellwig 写道:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 03:39:18PM +0800, Hongling Zeng wrote:
>> xfs_file_fsync() has a fallback flush for the case where the log force
>> was a no-op, for example fdatasync/O_DSYNC overwrites of already
>> allocated file data with no metadata updates.
>>
>> The current fallback path is limited to non-realtime inodes and always
>> flushes mp->m_ddev_targp. This misses realtime inodes whose data target
>> is selected by the inode and may be mp->m_rtdev_targp.
> No.  The rt device is flushed before the called to xfs_fsync_flush_log,
> as we need to ensure that the data is flushed from the cache before
> the log commit.  For the data device, the REQ_PREFLUSH case takes
> care that.  After xfs_fsync_flush_log we only need to take care of
> the data device if the file is on the data device and the cache
> wasn't flushed as part of the log commit.
Thanks for the explanation.

I understand that for realtime inodes with a separate RT device, the RT
device is flushed before xfs_fsync_flush_log(), and therefore the
post-log fallback path is intentionally limited to data-device files.

The only case I was worried about is whether it is possible to have a
realtime inode while mp->m_rtdev_targp == mp->m_ddev_targp, i.e. the
realtime data target is effectively the data device. In that case both
the early RT-device flush and the post-log fallback appear to be skipped
when log_flushed == 0.

If such a configuration is impossible by design, then my patch is wrong.

Thanks for clarifying.


  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-29  9:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-29  7:39 [PATCH] xfs: fix fallback data device flush for realtime inodes Hongling Zeng
2026-07-29  8:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-29  8:59   ` Hongling Zeng [this message]
2026-07-29 14:28     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6A69C0F0.8010206@126.com \
    --to=zhongling0719@126.com \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zenghongling@kylinos.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox