From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
irogers@google.com, eranian@google.com, ak@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/core: Fix endless multiplex timer
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 09:20:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6a271c19-9575-24ca-8ebc-9ff5a65bbe3d@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200304093344.GJ2596@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 3/4/2020 4:33 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 08:40:10PM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
>>> I'm thinking this is wrong.
>>>
>>> That is, yes, this fixes the observed problem, but it also misses at
>>> least one other site. Which seems to suggest we ought to take a
>>> different approach.
>>>
>>> But even with that; I wonder if the actual condition isn't wrong.
>>> Suppose the event was exclusive, and other events weren't scheduled
>>> because of that. Then you disable the one exclusive event _and_ kill
>>> rotation, so then nothing else will ever get on.
>>>
>>> So what I think was supposed to happen is rotation killing itself;
>>> rotation will schedule out the context -- which will clear the flag, and
>>> then schedule the thing back in -- which will set the flag again when
>>> needed.
>>>
>>> Now, that isn't happening, and I think I see why, because when we drop
>>> to !nr_active, we terminate ctx_sched_out() before we get to clearing
>>> the flag, oops!
>>>
>>> So how about something like this?
>>>
>>> ---
>>> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
>>> index e453589da97c..7947bd3271a9 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
>>> @@ -2182,6 +2182,7 @@ __perf_remove_from_context(struct perf_event *event,
>>> if (!ctx->nr_events && ctx->is_active) {
>>> ctx->is_active = 0;
>>> + ctx->rotate_necessary = 0;
>>> if (ctx->task) {
>>> WARN_ON_ONCE(cpuctx->task_ctx != ctx);
>>> cpuctx->task_ctx = NULL;
>>
>>
>> The patch can fix the observed problem with uncore PMU.
>> But it cannot fix all the cases with core PMU, especially when NMI watchdog
>> is enabled.
>> Because the ctx->nr_events never be 0 with NMI watchdog enabled.
>
> But, I'm confused.. why do we care about nr_events==0 ? The below: vvvv
>
>>> @@ -3074,15 +3075,15 @@ static void ctx_sched_out(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
>>> is_active ^= ctx->is_active; /* changed bits */
>>> - if (!ctx->nr_active || !(is_active & EVENT_ALL))
>>> - return;
>>> -
>>> /*
>>> * If we had been multiplexing, no rotations are necessary, now no events
>>> * are active.
>>> */
>>> ctx->rotate_necessary = 0;
>>> + if (!ctx->nr_active || !(is_active & EVENT_ALL))
>>> + return;
>>> +
>>> perf_pmu_disable(ctx->pmu);
>>> if (is_active & EVENT_PINNED) {
>>> list_for_each_entry_safe(event, tmp, &ctx->pinned_active, active_list)
>
> Makes sure we clear the flag when we ctx_sched_out(), and as long as
> ctx->rotate_necessary is set, perf_rotate_context() will do exactly
> that.
>
NMI watchdog is pinned event.
ctx_event_to_rotate() will only pick an event from the flexible_groups.
So the cpu_ctx_sched_out() in perf_rotate_context() will never be called.
Thanks,
Kan
> Then ctx_sched_in() will re-set the flag if it failed to schedule a
> counter.
>
> So where is that going wrong?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-04 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-03 20:28 [PATCH] perf/core: Fix endless multiplex timer kan.liang
2020-03-03 21:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-04 1:40 ` Liang, Kan
2020-03-04 9:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-04 14:20 ` Liang, Kan [this message]
2020-03-05 12:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-05 17:56 ` Liang, Kan
2020-03-20 12:58 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-06 18:11 ` Robin Murphy
2020-08-06 18:53 ` Greg KH
2020-08-06 20:40 ` Robin Murphy
2020-03-24 6:00 ` [perf/core] 92b1f046a2: BUG:kernel_NULL_pointer_dereference,address kernel test robot
2020-03-24 12:52 ` Liang, Kan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6a271c19-9575-24ca-8ebc-9ff5a65bbe3d@linux.intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox