public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: "Moger, Babu" <Babu.Moger@amd.com>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"fenghua.yu@intel.com" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	"vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com" <vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com>,
	"tony.luck@intel.com" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"pombredanne@nexb.com" <pombredanne@nexb.com>,
	"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"kstewart@linuxfoundation.org" <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"bp@suse.de" <bp@suse.de>,
	"rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	"ak@linux.intel.com" <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	"kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com"
	<kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	"xiaochen.shen@intel.com" <xiaochen.shen@intel.com>,
	"colin.king@canonical.com" <colin.king@canonical.com>,
	"Hurwitz, Sherry" <sherry.hurwitz@amd.com>,
	"Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com>,
	"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"dwmw@amazon.co.uk" <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
	"luto@kernel.org" <luto@kernel.org>,
	"jroedel@suse.de" <jroedel@suse.de>,
	"jannh@google.com" <jannh@google.com>,
	"dima@arista.com" <dima@arista.com>,
	"jpoimboe@redhat.com" <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	"vkuznets@redhat.com" <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 07/10] arch/x86: Bring few more functions into the resource structure
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 15:07:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6a4085c8-b220-1694-eb96-e858f2a091f5@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180924191841.29111-8-babu.moger@amd.com>

Hi Babu,

On 9/24/2018 12:19 PM, Moger, Babu wrote:
> Bring all resource functions that are different between the vendors
> into resource structure and initialize them dynamically.
> 
> Implement these functions separately for each vendors.
> update_mba_bw : Feedback loop bandwidth update functionality is not
>                 needed for AMD.
> cbm_validate  : Cache bitmask validate function. AMD allows
>                 non-contiguous masks. So, use separate functions for
>                 Intel and AMD.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/rdt.c             | 17 +++++++++++++----
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/rdt.h             | 19 +++++++++++++------
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/rdt_ctrlmondata.c |  4 ++--
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/rdt_monitor.c     | 10 +++++++---
>  4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/rdt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/rdt.c
> index 6dec45bf81d6..ae26b9b3fafa 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/rdt.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/rdt.c
> @@ -867,10 +867,19 @@ static __init void rdt_init_res_defs_intel(void)
>  	struct rdt_resource *r;
>  
>  	for_each_rdt_resource(r) {
> -		if (r->rid == RDT_RESOURCE_MBA) {
> -			r->msr_base = IA32_MBA_THRTL_BASE;
> -			r->msr_update = mba_wrmsr;
> -			r->parse_ctrlval = parse_bw;
> +		if ((r->rid == RDT_RESOURCE_L3) ||
> +		    (r->rid == RDT_RESOURCE_L3DATA) ||
> +		    (r->rid == RDT_RESOURCE_L3CODE) ||
> +		    (r->rid == RDT_RESOURCE_L2) ||
> +		    (r->rid == RDT_RESOURCE_L2DATA) ||
> +		    (r->rid == RDT_RESOURCE_L2CODE))
> +			r->cbm_validate = cbm_validate;

Same comment here about naming as in patch 6. Later cbm_validate_amd
would appear while this remains - to help reduce confusion it may help
to rename this function to cbm_validate_intel at this time.

> +
> +		else if (r->rid == RDT_RESOURCE_MBA) {
> +			 r->msr_base = IA32_MBA_THRTL_BASE;
> +			 r->msr_update = mba_wrmsr;
> +			 r->parse_ctrlval = parse_bw;
> +			 r->update_mba_bw = update_mba_bw;

Same comment about naming.

>  		}
>  	}
>  }
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/rdt.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/rdt.h
> index 2569c10c37f4..7205157d359b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/rdt.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/rdt.h
> @@ -386,9 +386,9 @@ static inline bool is_mbm_event(int e)
>   * struct rdt_resource - attributes of an RDT resource
>   * @rid:		The index of the resource
>   * @alloc_enabled:	Is allocation enabled on this machine
> - * @mon_enabled:		Is monitoring enabled for this feature
> + * @mon_enabled:	Is monitoring enabled for this feature
>   * @alloc_capable:	Is allocation available on this machine
> - * @mon_capable:		Is monitor feature available on this machine
> + * @mon_capable:	Is monitor feature available on this machine
>   * @name:		Name to use in "schemata" file
>   * @num_closid:		Number of CLOSIDs available
>   * @cache_level:	Which cache level defines scope of this resource
> @@ -400,10 +400,12 @@ static inline bool is_mbm_event(int e)
>   * @cache:		Cache allocation related data
>   * @format_str:		Per resource format string to show domain value
>   * @parse_ctrlval:	Per resource function pointer to parse control values
> - * @evt_list:			List of monitoring events
> - * @num_rmid:			Number of RMIDs available
> - * @mon_scale:			cqm counter * mon_scale = occupancy in bytes
> - * @fflags:			flags to choose base and info files
> + * @update_mba_bw:	Feedback loop for MBA software controllerer function

controllerer -> controller ?

> + * @cbm_validate	Cache bitmask validate function
> + * @evt_list:		List of monitoring events
> + * @num_rmid:		Number of RMIDs available
> + * @mon_scale:		cqm counter * mon_scale = occupancy in bytes
> + * @fflags:		flags to choose base and info files
>   */
>  struct rdt_resource {
>  	int			rid;
> @@ -425,6 +427,9 @@ struct rdt_resource {
>  	const char		*format_str;
>  	int (*parse_ctrlval)	(void *data, struct rdt_resource *r,
>  				 struct rdt_domain *d);
> +	void (*update_mba_bw)   (struct rdtgroup *rgrp,
> +				 struct rdt_domain *dom_mbm);
> +	bool (*cbm_validate)    (char *buf, u32 *data, struct rdt_resource *r);
>  	struct list_head	evt_list;
>  	int			num_rmid;
>  	unsigned int		mon_scale;
> @@ -562,5 +567,7 @@ void cqm_setup_limbo_handler(struct rdt_domain *dom, unsigned long delay_ms);
>  void cqm_handle_limbo(struct work_struct *work);
>  bool has_busy_rmid(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_domain *d);
>  void __check_limbo(struct rdt_domain *d, bool force_free);
> +void update_mba_bw(struct rdtgroup *rgrp, struct rdt_domain *dom_mbm);
> +bool cbm_validate(char *buf, u32 *data, struct rdt_resource *r);
>  
>  #endif /* _ASM_X86_RDT_H */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/rdt_ctrlmondata.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/rdt_ctrlmondata.c
> index 0565c564b297..5a282b6c4bd7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/rdt_ctrlmondata.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/rdt_ctrlmondata.c
> @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ int parse_bw(void *_buf, struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_domain *d)
>   *	are allowed (e.g. FFFFH, 0FF0H, 003CH, etc.).
>   * Additionally Haswell requires at least two bits set.
>   */
> -static bool cbm_validate(char *buf, u32 *data, struct rdt_resource *r)
> +bool cbm_validate(char *buf, u32 *data, struct rdt_resource *r)
>  {
>  	unsigned long first_bit, zero_bit, val;
>  	unsigned int cbm_len = r->cache.cbm_len;
> @@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ int parse_cbm(void *_data, struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_domain *d)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (!cbm_validate(data->buf, &cbm_val, r))
> +	if ((r->cbm_validate) && !(r->cbm_validate(data->buf, &cbm_val, r)))

I do not think you need all of those brackets.

Reinette

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-02 22:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-24 19:18 [RFC PATCH 00/10] arch/x86: AMD QoS support Moger, Babu
2018-09-24 19:18 ` [RFC PATCH 01/10] arch/x86: Start renaming the rdt files to more generic names Moger, Babu
2018-09-24 19:18 ` [RFC PATCH 02/10] arch/x86: Rename the RDT functions and definitions Moger, Babu
2018-09-24 19:19 ` [RFC PATCH 03/10] arch/x86: Re-arrange RDT init code Moger, Babu
2018-10-02 19:21   ` Reinette Chatre
2018-10-02 23:41     ` Moger, Babu
2018-10-03 18:54       ` Reinette Chatre
2018-10-03 20:12         ` Moger, Babu
2018-09-24 19:19 ` [RFC PATCH 04/10] arch/x86: Introduce a new config parameter PLATFORM_QOS Moger, Babu
2018-09-24 19:19 ` [RFC PATCH 05/10] arch/x86: Use new config parameter PLATFORM_QOS for compilation Moger, Babu
2018-09-24 19:19 ` [RFC PATCH 06/10] arch/x86: Initialize the resource functions that are different Moger, Babu
2018-10-02 22:06   ` Reinette Chatre
2018-10-03 15:25     ` Moger, Babu
2018-09-24 19:19 ` [RFC PATCH 07/10] arch/x86: Bring few more functions into the resource structure Moger, Babu
2018-10-02 22:07   ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2018-10-03 15:32     ` Moger, Babu
2018-09-24 19:19 ` [RFC PATCH 08/10] arch/x86: Introduce new config parameter AMD_QOS Moger, Babu
2018-09-24 19:19 ` [RFC PATCH 09/10] arch/x86: Add AMD feature bit X86_FEATURE_MBA in cpuid bits array Moger, Babu
2018-09-24 19:19 ` [RFC PATCH 10/10] arch/x86: Introduce QOS feature for AMD Moger, Babu
2018-10-02 18:27   ` Fenghua Yu
2018-10-03 15:56     ` Moger, Babu
2018-10-02 22:13   ` Reinette Chatre
2018-10-03 17:21     ` Moger, Babu
2018-10-05 16:20   ` James Morse
2018-10-05 17:18     ` Moger, Babu
2018-09-27 20:14 ` [RFC PATCH 00/10] arch/x86: AMD QoS support Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-28  1:57   ` Moger, Babu
2018-10-05 16:18     ` James Morse
2018-10-05 17:03       ` Moger, Babu
2018-10-02 17:06 ` Fenghua Yu
2018-10-02 17:44   ` Moger, Babu
2018-10-02 18:46     ` Fenghua Yu
2018-10-02 19:16       ` Moger, Babu
2018-10-03 18:52         ` Fenghua Yu
2018-10-03 19:48           ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-03 20:09           ` Moger, Babu
2018-10-05 16:19             ` James Morse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6a4085c8-b220-1694-eb96-e858f2a091f5@intel.com \
    --to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=Babu.Moger@amd.com \
    --cc=Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
    --cc=dima@arista.com \
    --cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pombredanne@nexb.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=sherry.hurwitz@amd.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaochen.shen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox