public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	Mario Limonciello <superm1@kernel.org>
Cc: "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Mathias Nyman" <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
	"Mika Westerberg" <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	"open list : PCI SUBSYSTEM" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list : USB XHCI DRIVER" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Drake" <drake@endlessos.org>, "Gary Li" <Gary.Li@amd.com>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] PCI: Check PCI_PM_CTRL instead of PCI_COMMAND in pci_dev_wait()
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 11:29:23 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6ac2dfbf-fd9a-4223-8d9e-bb41dbf98b1a@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240830000137.GA84915@bhelgaas>

On 8/29/2024 19:01, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 10:40:20AM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>> From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
>>
>> If a dock is plugged in at the same time as autosuspend delay then
>> this can cause malfunctions in the USB4 stack. This happens because
>> the device is still in D3cold at the time that the PCI core handed
>> control back to the USB4 stack.
>>
>> A device that has gone through a reset may return a value in
>> PCI_COMMAND but that doesn't mean it's finished transitioning to D0.
>> For devices that support power management explicitly check
>> PCI_PM_CTRL on everything but system resume to ensure the transition
>> happened.
> 
> Still trying to understand what's going on here.
> 
> I posted a change to pci_dev_wait() to read Vendor ID, look for Config
> RRS status, and wait for a successful completion (when RRS Software
> Visibility is enabled) [1].
> 
> You tested that and found that it didn't help with *this* issue [2].
> I assume you tested something like v6.11-rc plus the patches from [1],
> i.e., without the PCI_PM_CTRL changes in this series.
> 
>    1) Initially the device is in D0
> 
>    2) We put it in D3cold (using some ACPI method) because the
>    autosuspend delay expired (?)
> 
>    3) Plugging in the dock wakes up the device, so we power up the
>    device (via pci_power_up(), which again uses some ACPI method), and
>    it should transition to D0uninitialized
> 
>    4) The USB4 stack sees the device but thinks it's in D3cold (?)
> 
> If your testing only included [1], but did not include the
> pci_power_up() change from patch 3/5 "Verify functions currently in
> D3cold have entered D0", I don't think we would call pci_dev_wait(),
> so I wouldn't expect [1] to make any difference.
> 
> If you *did* include both [1] and patch 3/5, the implication would be
> that pci_dev_wait() successfully read the Vendor ID, meaning the
> device is not in D3cold when pci_power_up() returns.

The testing here was from the LTS 6.6.y kernel with both [1] and patch 
3/5 from this series.

I can get testing from 6.11-rc6 with a combination of patches if you 
would like.

> 
> Can you clarify what you see and possibly expand/correct my timeline
> above?

The timeline you shared is nearly correct.  The USB4 stack *thinks* the 
device is in D0 because of the return of pci_power_up().

As by polling PCI_PM_CTRL we can see it's still in D3, so it hasn't made 
it to D0uninitialized yet.

I guess I reading between the lines you have an assumption that you 
can't read the vendor ID from D3; which doesn't appear to be the case 
from our testing.

> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20240827234848.4429-1-helgaas@kernel.org/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/30d9589a-8050-421b-a9a5-ad3422feadad@amd.com/
> 
>> Devices that don't support power management and system resume will
>> continue to use PCI_COMMAND.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
>> ---
>> v4->v5:
>>   * Fix misleading indentation
>>   * Amend commit message
>> ---
>>   drivers/pci/pci.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>   1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> index 1e219057a5069..f032a4aaec268 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> @@ -1309,21 +1309,33 @@ static int pci_dev_wait(struct pci_dev *dev, enum pci_reset_type reset_type, int
>>   	 * the read (except when CRS SV is enabled and the read was for the
>>   	 * Vendor ID; in that case it synthesizes 0x0001 data).
>>   	 *
>> -	 * Wait for the device to return a non-CRS completion.  Read the
>> -	 * Command register instead of Vendor ID so we don't have to
>> -	 * contend with the CRS SV value.
>> +	 * Wait for the device to return a non-CRS completion.  On devices
>> +	 * that support PM control and on waits that aren't part of system
>> +	 * resume read the PM control register to ensure the device has
>> +	 * transitioned to D0.  On devices that don't support PM control,
>> +	 * or during system resume read the command register to instead of
>> +	 * Vendor ID so we don't have to contend with the CRS SV value.
>>   	 */
>>   	for (;;) {
>> -		u32 id;
>> -
>>   		if (pci_dev_is_disconnected(dev)) {
>>   			pci_dbg(dev, "disconnected; not waiting\n");
>>   			return -ENOTTY;
>>   		}
>>   
>> -		pci_read_config_dword(dev, PCI_COMMAND, &id);
>> -		if (!PCI_POSSIBLE_ERROR(id))
>> -			break;
>> +		if (dev->pm_cap && reset_type != PCI_DEV_WAIT_RESUME) {
>> +			u16 pmcsr;
>> +
>> +			pci_read_config_word(dev, dev->pm_cap + PCI_PM_CTRL, &pmcsr);
>> +			if (!PCI_POSSIBLE_ERROR(pmcsr) &&
>> +			    (pmcsr & PCI_PM_CTRL_STATE_MASK) == PCI_D0)
>> +				break;
>> +		} else {
>> +			u32 id;
>> +
>> +			pci_read_config_dword(dev, PCI_COMMAND, &id);
>> +			if (!PCI_POSSIBLE_ERROR(id))
>> +				break;
>> +		}
>>   
>>   		if (delay > timeout) {
>>   			pci_warn(dev, "not ready %dms after %s; giving up\n",
>> -- 
>> 2.43.0
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-03 16:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-23 15:40 [PATCH v5 0/5] Verify devices transition from D3cold to D0 Mario Limonciello
2024-08-23 15:40 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] PCI: Use an enum for reset type in pci_dev_wait() Mario Limonciello
2024-08-23 15:40 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] PCI: Check PCI_PM_CTRL instead of PCI_COMMAND " Mario Limonciello
2024-08-23 19:54   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-08-26 19:16     ` Mario Limonciello
2024-08-27 17:43       ` Mario Limonciello
2024-08-27 19:44       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-08-30  0:01   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-09-03 16:29     ` Mario Limonciello [this message]
2024-09-03 17:11       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-09-03 17:31         ` Mario Limonciello
2024-09-03 18:25           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-09-03 18:32             ` Mario Limonciello
2024-09-03 21:32               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-09-04 12:05               ` Mika Westerberg
2024-09-04 15:24                 ` Mario Limonciello
2024-09-05  9:33                   ` Mika Westerberg
2024-09-09 20:40                     ` Mario Limonciello
2024-09-10  9:13                       ` Mika Westerberg
2024-09-13  4:12                         ` Mario Limonciello
2024-09-13  4:58                           ` Mika Westerberg
2024-09-13  7:23                             ` Mika Westerberg
2024-09-13 20:56                               ` Mario Limonciello
2024-09-15  7:07                                 ` Mika Westerberg
2024-08-23 15:40 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] PCI: Verify functions currently in D3cold have entered D0 Mario Limonciello
2024-08-23 15:40 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] PCI: Allow Ryzen XHCI controllers into D3cold and drop delays Mario Limonciello
2024-08-23 15:40 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] PCI: Drop Radeon quirk for Macbook Pro 8.2 Mario Limonciello
2024-12-04 17:30 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] Verify devices transition from D3cold to D0 Mario Limonciello
2024-12-04 23:45   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-12-05  3:44     ` Mario Limonciello
2024-12-05 18:12       ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6ac2dfbf-fd9a-4223-8d9e-bb41dbf98b1a@amd.com \
    --to=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=Gary.Li@amd.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=drake@endlessos.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=superm1@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox