From: "Zqiang" <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>
To: "Puranjay Mohan" <puranjay@kernel.org>,
"Lai Jiangshan" <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
"Josh Triplett" <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
"Onur Özkan" <work@onurozkan.dev>,
"Frederic Weisbecker" <frederic@kernel.org>,
"Neeraj Upadhyay" <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
"Joel Fernandes" <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
"Boqun Feng" <boqun@kernel.org>,
"Uladzislau Rezki" <urezki@gmail.com>,
"Davidlohr Bueso" <dave@stgolabs.net>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
"Eduard Zingerman" <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi" <memxor@gmail.com>
Cc: "Puranjay Mohan" <puranjay@kernel.org>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
"Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
"Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
"Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
"Emil Tsalapatis" <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
"Matt Fleming" <mfleming@cloudflare.com>,
"Harry Yoo (Oracle)" <harry@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] rcu: Make call_rcu() safe to call from any context
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 12:20:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6ad0805c551a62283dca666fbace7302e2236e3a@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260729162207.1567770-2-puranjay@kernel.org>
>
> call_rcu() touches its per-CPU callback list only with interrupts
> disabled: the enqueue runs under local_irq_save() (plus the nocb locks
> when offloaded), as do callback invocation and grace-period work. A
> call_rcu() that arrives with interrupts already disabled may be
> interrupting one of those, so enqueuing directly could corrupt the list
> or deadlock -- as an NMI or re-entrant instrumentation can.
>
> Defer in that case: stage the callback on a per-CPU llist and kick an
> irq_work that re-issues it once interrupts are back on, going straight to
> the enqueue so it cannot defer again. Callers that merely hold interrupts
> off are deferred too, which is harmless. Skip the gate while the
> scheduler is down (RCU_SCHEDULER_INACTIVE): irq_work is not usable until
> init_IRQ(), yet rcu_init() already calls call_rcu().
>
> rcu_barrier() flushes pending deferred callbacks first: it waits out each
> online CPU's irq_work and drains an offline CPU's list directly, as that
> irq_work may never run again. rcutree_migrate_callbacks() also drains an
> outgoing CPU's ->defer_head, so a callback deferred late in the offline
> path runs even without an rcu_barrier(). The irq_work is
> IRQ_WORK_INIT_HARD so the re-issue runs promptly and callbacks do not back
> up; on PREEMPT_RT a non-HARD irq_work would run in a kthread that can be
> delayed under load. A new hidden CONFIG_RCU_DEFER gates the code and the
> IRQ_WORK dependency; without it call_rcu() enqueues directly as before.
>
> Under CONFIG_PROVE_RCU, warn if the direct path is reached from NMI, which
> would mean interrupts were enabled on NMI entry.
>
> Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
> ---
> kernel/rcu/Kconfig | 6 +++
> kernel/rcu/rcu.h | 15 ++++++
> kernel/rcu/tree.c | 120 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> kernel/rcu/tree.h | 5 ++
> 4 files changed, 136 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
> index f15da8038d0ba..1a5fb3156c062 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
> @@ -175,6 +175,12 @@ config RCU_STALL_COMMON
> config RCU_NEED_SEGCBLIST
> def_bool ( TREE_RCU || TREE_SRCU || TASKS_RCU_GENERIC )
>
> +# The deferral (and the IRQ_WORK it uses) is only needed where call_rcu() /
> +# call_srcu() can be invoked while a callback-list operation is in flight.
> +config RCU_DEFER
> + def_bool HAVE_NMI || KPROBES || FUNCTION_TRACER || TRACEPOINTS
> + select IRQ_WORK
> +
> config RCU_FANOUT
> int "Tree-based hierarchical RCU fanout value"
> range 2 64 if 64BIT
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
> index 39a9f6fa9a7b2..ed6604445f2ac 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
> @@ -572,6 +572,21 @@ static inline void tasks_cblist_init_generic(void) { }
> #define RCU_SCHEDULER_INIT 1
> #define RCU_SCHEDULER_RUNNING 2
>
> +/*
> + * Should a call_rcu()/call_srcu() callback be deferred rather than enqueued
> + * now? Defer whenever interrupts are disabled: a callback-list operation may
> + * be in flight on this CPU, so enqueuing now could corrupt it. But not while
> + * the scheduler is down -- early boot is single-threaded and can call this
> + * before init_IRQ() makes irq_work usable (e.g. rcu_init()'s self-tests).
> + */
> +static inline bool should_rcu_defer(void)
> +{
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_DEFER))
> + return false;
> +
> + return irqs_disabled() && rcu_scheduler_active != RCU_SCHEDULER_INACTIVE;
> +}
> +
> enum rcutorture_type {
> RCU_FLAVOR,
> RCU_TASKS_FLAVOR,
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index 21b6ce1dffb63..93c4242345e67 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
> #include <linux/smp.h>
> #include <linux/rcupdate_wait.h>
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/llist.h>
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> #include <linux/sched/debug.h>
> #include <linux/nmi.h>
> @@ -3148,21 +3149,27 @@ static void check_cb_ovld(struct rcu_data *rdp)
> raw_spin_unlock_rcu_node(rnp);
> }
>
> -static void
> -__call_rcu_common(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func, bool lazy_in)
> +/*
> + * The callback list is only ever accessed with interrupts disabled (enqueue,
> + * callback invocation, grace-period work). A call_rcu() with interrupts already
> + * disabled may interrupt one of those, so __call_rcu_common() defers: the
> + * callback is staged on a per-CPU llist that an irq_work re-issues once
> + * interrupts are on. Only CONFIG_RCU_DEFER kernels can hit this.
> + */
> +static void rcu_defer_drain(struct irq_work *iw);
> +
> +/*
> + * Enqueue @head on this CPU's rcu_segcblist. Also called by rcu_defer_drain()
> + * to re-issue a deferred callback, so it must not re-check the deferral
> + * condition. Either caller may have interrupts already disabled.
> + */
> +static void rcu_do_enqueue(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func, bool lazy_in)
> {
> static atomic_t doublefrees;
> unsigned long flags;
> bool lazy;
> struct rcu_data *rdp;
>
> - /* Misaligned rcu_head! */
> - WARN_ON_ONCE((unsigned long)head & (sizeof(void *) - 1));
> -
> - /* Avoid NULL dereference if callback is NULL. */
> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!func))
> - return;
> -
> if (debug_rcu_head_queue(head)) {
> /*
> * Probable double call_rcu(), so leak the callback.
> @@ -3206,6 +3213,83 @@ __call_rcu_common(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func, bool lazy_in)
> local_irq_restore(flags);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Re-issue deferred callbacks, going straight to the enqueue so they cannot
> + * defer again. defer_lock is held across llist_del_all() and the re-issue so
> + * the drainers -- this CPU's irq_work, rcu_defer_flush() and
> + * rcutree_migrate_callbacks() -- serialize and never leave a callback off
> + * ->defer_head yet not on a callback list.
> + */
> +static void rcu_defer_drain(struct irq_work *iw)
> +{
> + struct rcu_data *rdp = container_of(iw, struct rcu_data, defer_work);
> + struct llist_node *node, *next;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rdp->defer_lock, flags);
> + llist_for_each_safe(node, next, llist_del_all(&rdp->defer_head)) {
> + struct rcu_head *head = (struct rcu_head *)node;
> +
> + rcu_do_enqueue(head, head->func, false);
> + }
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rdp->defer_lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +/* Stage @head for this CPU's irq_work when call_rcu() cannot enqueue now. */
> +static void call_rcu_defer(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
> +{
> + struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);
> +
> + head->func = func;
> + if (llist_add((struct llist_node *)head, &rdp->defer_head))
> + irq_work_queue(&rdp->defer_work);
If current CPU is isolation and nozh_full, maybe we should avoid to
queue irq_work to current CPUs(include srcu, tasks-rcu) ?
Maybe can wrap a helper function:
bool rcu_irq_work_queue(struct irq_work *iw)
{
if (in_nmi())
return irq_work_queue(iw);
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
if (!housekeeping_test_cpu(cpu, HK_TYPE_KERNEL_NOISE))
cpu = housekeeping_any_cpu(HK_TYPE_KERNEL_NOISE);
return irq_work_queue_on(iw, cpu);
}
Thanks
Zqiang
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Register pending deferred callbacks into the callback lists so a following
> + * rcu_barrier() waits for them. This runs before rcu_barrier() scans the
> + * lists. An online CPU's own irq_work re-issues its callbacks, so wait it out;
> + * an offline CPU's irq_work may never run again, so drain its list directly
> + * onto this CPU instead.
> + */
> +static void rcu_defer_flush(void)
> +{
> + int cpu;
> +
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_DEFER))
> + return;
> +
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> + struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu);
> +
> + if (cpu_online(cpu))
> + irq_work_sync(&rdp->defer_work);
> + else
> + rcu_defer_drain(&rdp->defer_work);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +__call_rcu_common(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func, bool lazy_in)
> +{
> + /* Misaligned rcu_head! */
> + WARN_ON_ONCE((unsigned long)head & (sizeof(void *) - 1));
> +
> + /* Avoid NULL dereference if callback is NULL. */
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!func))
> + return;
> +
> + if (should_rcu_defer()) {
> + call_rcu_defer(head, func);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /* An NMI reaching here entered with irqs enabled, so the enqueue can race. */
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_RCU) && in_nmi());
> +
> + rcu_do_enqueue(head, func, lazy_in);
> +}
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_LAZY
> static bool enable_rcu_lazy __read_mostly = !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_LAZY_DEFAULT_OFF);
> module_param(enable_rcu_lazy, bool, 0444);
> @@ -3896,8 +3980,12 @@ void rcu_barrier(void)
> unsigned long flags;
> unsigned long gseq;
> struct rcu_data *rdp;
> - unsigned long s = rcu_seq_snap(&rcu_state.barrier_sequence);
> + unsigned long s;
> +
> + /* Register any deferred callbacks before snapshotting the sequence. */
> + rcu_defer_flush();
>
> + s = rcu_seq_snap(&rcu_state.barrier_sequence);
> rcu_barrier_trace(TPS("Begin"), -1, s);
>
> /* Take mutex to serialize concurrent rcu_barrier() requests. */
> @@ -4231,6 +4319,10 @@ rcu_boot_init_percpu_data(int cpu)
> rdp->rcu_onl_gp_state = RCU_GP_CLEANED;
> rdp->last_sched_clock = jiffies;
> rdp->cpu = cpu;
> + init_llist_head(&rdp->defer_head);
> + raw_spin_lock_init(&rdp->defer_lock);
> + /* Hard irq_work so the re-issue runs promptly. */
> + rdp->defer_work = IRQ_WORK_INIT_HARD(rcu_defer_drain);
> rcu_boot_init_nocb_percpu_data(rdp);
> }
>
> @@ -4528,6 +4620,14 @@ void rcutree_migrate_callbacks(int cpu)
> struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu);
> bool needwake;
>
> + /*
> + * Callbacks the outgoing CPU deferred late in the offline path (past the
> + * point its irq_work can run) sit on ->defer_head, which the ->cblist
> + * migration below does not cover. Drain them here, before the early
> + * returns; the re-issue lands on this CPU.
> + */
> + rcu_defer_drain(&rdp->defer_work);
> +
> if (rcu_rdp_is_offloaded(rdp))
> return;
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> index eedfa43059e80..3a8e17136c5a7 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> @@ -229,6 +229,11 @@ struct rcu_data {
> struct rcu_head barrier_head;
> int exp_watching_snap; /* Double-check need for IPI. */
>
> + /* Deferral of an NMI/reentrant call_rcu(); see __call_rcu_common(). */
> + struct llist_head defer_head;
> + struct irq_work defer_work;
> + raw_spinlock_t defer_lock;
> +
> /* 5) Callback offloading. */
> #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU
> struct swait_queue_head nocb_cb_wq; /* For nocb kthreads to sleep on. */
> --
> 2.53.0-Meta
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-30 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-29 16:21 [PATCH 0/6] rcu,srcu: Make call_rcu()/call_srcu() safe from any context Puranjay Mohan
2026-07-29 16:22 ` [PATCH 1/6] rcu: Make call_rcu() safe to call " Puranjay Mohan
2026-07-30 12:20 ` Zqiang [this message]
2026-07-30 14:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-07-29 16:22 ` [PATCH 2/6] rcu: Make Tiny " Puranjay Mohan
2026-07-29 16:22 ` [PATCH 3/6] srcu: Make call_srcu() " Puranjay Mohan
2026-07-29 16:22 ` [PATCH 4/6] srcu: Make Tiny " Puranjay Mohan
2026-07-29 16:22 ` [PATCH 5/6] rcutorture: Exercise ->call() from NMI context Puranjay Mohan
2026-07-29 16:22 ` [PATCH 6/6] selftests/bpf: Add a call_srcu() re-entry reproducer Puranjay Mohan
2026-07-30 3:07 ` [PATCH 0/6] rcu,srcu: Make call_rcu()/call_srcu() safe from any context Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6ad0805c551a62283dca666fbace7302e2236e3a@linux.dev \
--to=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=mfleming@cloudflare.com \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=work@onurozkan.dev \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox