From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4468D2F23; Thu, 8 Aug 2024 19:46:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723146361; cv=none; b=X2UrBYvkeGoTc4VXSu/XScbXxO922B6h/lb2RUlj4zC5vrXzQpJ3QWc+OhgENh0aezf/oUwnYAtcC0ERtdbJBdjJYOQQVsZUdPmQCjkPu7+uPEJx/zQwAc/xZ0PC5T+Z73PbFY0iC80fh8kIfBYOVQq6rMLlbUIjJgC0es6OC0Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723146361; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BqACvSNDT8Zhao8FyVCgc3fIxwqa2PLl8h463ajEmaA=; h=Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References: Subject:From:Cc:To:Date; b=ko2Rflt1JcwBMNpWbXjFxW+RIlCsHFiNflg5kRlanZBDkf7QkkY6nHRNwNHj1rXaNjzy0gawDtYGRYXcMtyKfGRMs1BkCewos2I//awxAvMp8128YWeQ4QffdotitDSrcPVsNG24ULqr7UIYLSvk1UrwiR7gBup9YfuZFPI9Tno= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=OViQqds/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="OViQqds/" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AEF5FC32782; Thu, 8 Aug 2024 19:46:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1723146360; bh=BqACvSNDT8Zhao8FyVCgc3fIxwqa2PLl8h463ajEmaA=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date:From; b=OViQqds/ZR+NfWdoOK5bN5vsclLQLXYUEtZ3P9VYh1x8efOjLTBv6FCAvUMiBY1c1 6hoDSP3uymjiAa6vT7I3i2H7PDp6Mt/4l6yLGqIkrLepSWeb3boWdTfu35Kwt3Mp6N uyDfSU8b3PiZGssxebrwNFrbmxERVYC7ZybLCFuB7xZbgn1SKzRYhdLH7RyBzfJiiK QL9aj3E3imPuALcEGU2gap2F/of3ZtcfoRhToCUm8xxWN/PgMRJnZuW+FttbEZV1xZ CIpf46q40tiKV1IiRlsT2jKgI5+Vd2hnkwlkVMyNefAJoDAvACJ6Lv1TuobnTgX/io s998Gc9x/TQKA== Message-ID: <6bc191590c1a5b7fa3ef991d6b7e327b.sboyd@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20240804-clk-u64-v4-2-8e55569f39a4@nxp.com> References: <20240804-clk-u64-v4-0-8e55569f39a4@nxp.com> <20240804-clk-u64-v4-2-8e55569f39a4@nxp.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] clk: clk-conf: support assigned-clock-rates-u64 From: Stephen Boyd Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Peng Fan To: Luca Ceresoli , Michael Turquette , Peng Fan (OSS) , Rob Herring , Saravana Kannan Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2024 12:45:58 -0700 User-Agent: alot/0.10 Quoting Peng Fan (OSS) (2024-08-04 05:32:56) > From: Peng Fan >=20 > i.MX95 System Management Control Firmware(SCMI) manages the clock > function, it exposes PLL VCO which could support up to 5GHz rate that > exceeds UINT32_MAX. So add assigned-clock-rates-u64 support > to set rate that exceeds UINT32_MAX. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan > --- > drivers/clk/clk-conf.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) Thanks. I'd like to have a DT overlay KUnit test for this as well. Either you can write it, or I'll write it next week.