From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
vitaly.slobodskoy@intel.com, pavel.gerasimov@intel.com,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 01/13] perf/core: Add new branch sample type for LBR TOS
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 17:25:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6c233145-fb30-b629-2290-8595e192ba82@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABPqkBRrPgW+Kdkiqy0dTu6e_8G55XLfFh5mCLt1_UQEHU=Zbg@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/19/2019 2:02 PM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 6:35 AM<kan.liang@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> From: Kan Liang<kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>>
>> In LBR call stack mode, the depth of reconstructed LBR call stack limits
>> to the number of LBR registers. With LBR Top-of-Stack (TOS) information,
>> perf tool may stitch the stacks of two samples. The reconstructed LBR
>> call stack can break the HW limitation.
>>
>> Add a new branch sample type to retrieve LBR TOS. The new type is PMU
>> specific. Add it at the end of enum perf_branch_sample_type.
>> Add a macro to retrieve defined bits of branch sample type.
>> Update perf_copy_attr() to handle the new bit.
>>
>> Only when the new branch sample type is set, the TOS information is
>> dumped into the PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK output.
>> Perf tool should check the attr.branch_sample_type, and apply the
>> corresponding format for PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK samples.
>> Otherwise, some user case may be broken. For example, users may parse a
>> perf.data, which include the new branch sample type, with an old version
>> perf tool (without the check). Users probably get incorrect information
>> without any warning.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang<kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/perf_event.h | 2 ++
>> include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 16 ++++++++++++++--
>> kernel/events/core.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
>> 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
>> index 011dcbdbccc2..761021c7ee8a 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
>> @@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ struct perf_raw_record {
>> /*
>> * branch stack layout:
>> * nr: number of taken branches stored in entries[]
>> + * tos: Top-of-Stack (TOS) information. PMU specific data.
>> *
>> * Note that nr can vary from sample to sample
>> * branches (to, from) are stored from most recent
>> @@ -101,6 +102,7 @@ struct perf_raw_record {
>> */
>> struct perf_branch_stack {
>> __u64 nr;
>> + __u64 tos; /* PMU specific data */
>> struct perf_branch_entry entries[0];
>> };
>>
> Same remark as with the other patch. You need to abstract this.
> The TOS and PMU specific data should be limited to x86/event/intel/*.[ch].
>
If we change tos to a generic name, e.g. pmu_specific_data, can we still
keep it here?
If not, I think the only way is to introduce a new method, e.g.
output_br_pmu_data(), at struct pmu.
When outputting the sample data, the generic code will call
event->pmu->output_br_pmu_data() to retrieve the TOS in Intel code.
I think it's too complicated.
Thanks,
Kan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-19 22:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-19 14:33 [PATCH V4 00/13] Stitch LBR call stack kan.liang
2019-11-19 14:33 ` [PATCH V4 01/13] perf/core: Add new branch sample type for LBR TOS kan.liang
2019-11-19 19:02 ` Stephane Eranian
2019-11-19 22:25 ` Liang, Kan [this message]
2019-11-19 22:51 ` Stephane Eranian
2019-11-20 15:06 ` Liang, Kan
2019-11-19 14:34 ` [PATCH V4 02/13] perf/x86/intel: Output LBR TOS information kan.liang
2019-11-19 14:34 ` [PATCH V4 03/13] perf tools: Support new branch sample type for LBR TOS kan.liang
2019-11-19 19:00 ` Stephane Eranian
2019-11-19 21:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-19 22:17 ` Liang, Kan
2019-11-19 14:34 ` [PATCH V4 04/13] perf header: Add check for event attr kan.liang
2019-11-19 14:34 ` [PATCH V4 05/13] perf pmu: Add support for PMU capabilities kan.liang
2019-11-19 14:34 ` [PATCH V4 06/13] perf header: Support CPU " kan.liang
2019-11-19 14:34 ` [PATCH V4 07/13] perf machine: Refine the function for LBR call stack reconstruction kan.liang
2019-11-19 14:34 ` [PATCH V4 08/13] perf tools: Stitch LBR call stack kan.liang
2019-11-19 14:34 ` [PATCH V4 09/13] perf report: Add option to enable the LBR stitching approach kan.liang
2019-11-19 14:34 ` [PATCH V4 10/13] perf script: " kan.liang
2019-11-19 14:34 ` [PATCH V4 11/13] perf top: " kan.liang
2019-11-19 14:34 ` [PATCH V4 12/13] perf c2c: " kan.liang
2019-11-19 14:34 ` [RFC PATCH V4 13/13] perf hist: Add fast path for duplicate entries check approach kan.liang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6c233145-fb30-b629-2290-8595e192ba82@linux.intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=pavel.gerasimov@intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=vitaly.slobodskoy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox