Re: [RFC PATCH v2 15/18] KVM: TDX: Combine KVM_BUG_ON + pr_tdx_error() into TDX_BUG_ON()

[Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>]

On 8/29/2025 10:19 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2025, Binbin Wu wrote:
>> On 8/29/2025 8:06 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>>> Add TDX_BUG_ON() macros (with varying numbers of arguments) to deduplicate
>>> the myriad flows that do KVM_BUG_ON()/WARN_ON_ONCE() followed by a call to
>>> pr_tdx_error().  In addition to reducing boilerplate copy+paste code, this
>>> also helps ensure that KVM provides consistent handling of SEAMCALL errors.
>>>
>>> Opportunistically convert a handful of bare WARN_ON_ONCE() paths to the
>>> equivalent of KVM_BUG_ON(), i.e. have them terminate the VM.  If a SEAMCALL
>>> error is fatal enough to WARN on, it's fatal enough to terminate the TD.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
>>> ---
>>>    arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c | 114 +++++++++++++++++------------------------
>>>    1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
>>> index aa6d88629dae..df9b4496cd01 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
>>> @@ -24,20 +24,32 @@
>>>    #undef pr_fmt
>>>    #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
>>> -#define pr_tdx_error(__fn, __err)	\
>>> -	pr_err_ratelimited("SEAMCALL %s failed: 0x%llx\n", #__fn, __err)
>>> +#define __TDX_BUG_ON(__err, __f, __kvm, __fmt, __args...)			\
>>> +({										\
>>> +	struct kvm *_kvm = (__kvm);						\
>>> +	bool __ret = !!(__err);							\
>>> +										\
>>> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(__ret && (!_kvm || !_kvm->vm_bugged))) {		\
>>> +		if (_kvm)							\
>>> +			kvm_vm_bugged(_kvm);					\
>>> +		pr_err_ratelimited("SEAMCALL " __f " failed: 0x%llx" __fmt "\n",\
>>> +				   __err,  __args);				\
>>> +	}									\
>>> +	unlikely(__ret);							\
>>> +})
>>> -#define __pr_tdx_error_N(__fn_str, __err, __fmt, ...)		\
>>> -	pr_err_ratelimited("SEAMCALL " __fn_str " failed: 0x%llx, " __fmt,  __err,  __VA_ARGS__)
>>> +#define TDX_BUG_ON(__err, __fn, __kvm)				\
>>> +	__TDX_BUG_ON(__err, #__fn, __kvm, "%s", "")
>>> -#define pr_tdx_error_1(__fn, __err, __rcx)		\
>>> -	__pr_tdx_error_N(#__fn, __err, "rcx 0x%llx\n", __rcx)
>>> +#define TDX_BUG_ON_1(__err, __fn, __rcx, __kvm)			\
>>> +	__TDX_BUG_ON(__err, #__fn, __kvm, ", rcx 0x%llx", __rcx)
>>> -#define pr_tdx_error_2(__fn, __err, __rcx, __rdx)	\
>>> -	__pr_tdx_error_N(#__fn, __err, "rcx 0x%llx, rdx 0x%llx\n", __rcx, __rdx)
>>> +#define TDX_BUG_ON_2(__err, __fn, __rcx, __rdx, __kvm)		\
>>> +	__TDX_BUG_ON(__err, #__fn, __kvm, ", rcx 0x%llx, rdx 0x%llx", __rcx, __rdx)
>>> +
>>> +#define TDX_BUG_ON_3(__err, __fn, __rcx, __rdx, __r8, __kvm)	\
>>> +	__TDX_BUG_ON(__err, #__fn, __kvm, ", rcx 0x%llx, rdx 0x%llx, r8 0x%llx", __rcx, __rdx, __r8)
>>> -#define pr_tdx_error_3(__fn, __err, __rcx, __rdx, __r8)	\
>>> -	__pr_tdx_error_N(#__fn, __err, "rcx 0x%llx, rdx 0x%llx, r8 0x%llx\n", __rcx, __rdx, __r8)
>> I thought you would use the format Rick proposed in
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/9e55a0e767317d20fc45575c4ed6dafa863e1ca0.camel@intel.com/
>>      #define TDX_BUG_ON_2(__err, __fn, arg1, arg2, __kvm)        \
>>          __TDX_BUG_ON(__err, #__fn, __kvm, ", " #arg1 " 0x%llx, " #arg2 "
>>      0x%llx", arg1, arg2)
>>
>>      so you get: entry: 0x00 level:0xF00
>>
>> No?
> Ya, see the next patch :-)

Oh, sorry for the noise.
>