Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] x86/microcode/intel: Support mailbox transfer

["Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>]

On 3/26/2025 8:32 PM, Chao Gao wrote:
> 
> and in send_data_chunk(), do:
> 
> 	staging.state = wait_for_transaction();
> 	return staging.state != UCODE_OK;
> 
> It is simpler and requires less code. Even better, send_data_chunk() can just
> propagate the ucode_state to its caller.

Thanks for the suggestion. To me, this is more of a stylistic choice. 
Previously, the call site had a single line:

     return wait_for_transaction();

> By the way, checkpatch.pl warns that 'msleep < 20ms can sleep for up to 20ms;
> see function description of msleep().' This makes me wonder how the 10ms
> timeout was determined but not precisely enforced. Is it arbitrary or selected
> for specific reasons?

Yes, I saw that warning. It notes that msleep(1) could sleep for longer 
than 1 ms, which I thought was acceptable. The 10 ms timeout was 
determined through discussions with the firmware team responsible for 
staging.

Thanks,
Chang