Re: [PATCH] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: Update sched_clock when non-boot CPUs need counter workaround

Marc Zyngier
2023-01-20T05:26:13Z

On 2023-01-19 07:59, 刘琦 wrote:
> [Test Report]
> Result: Test Pass
>
> A total of two rounds of pending testing
> a. The first round of hanging test
> Number of machines: 200
> Hanging test duration: 48h
> Hanging test results: no walt crash problem
> b. The second round of hanging test
> Number of machines: 200
> Hanging test duration: 72h
> Hanging test results: no walt crash problem
>
> Tested-by: wangfajie <wangfajie@longcheer.com>
> Tested-by: liurenwang <liurenwang@longcheer.com>
> Tested-by: zhanghui <zhanghui5@longcheer.com>
> Tested-by: liangke <liangke1@xiaomi.com>

Thanks for this.

The only issue here is that that you don't explain what you tested,
nor how you tested it.

It is also a patch that has known defects (you just have to read the
thread for the details)... This makes this testing, no matter how
thorough it is, rather ineffective.

M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...