From: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>,
cgel.zte@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net, shuah@kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, mptcp@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ye Guojin <ye.guojin@zte.com.cn>, ZealRobot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: mptcp: remove duplicate include in mptcp_inq.c
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 10:00:35 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7041cc47-3728-c033-bc97-49d86a1938b9@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211210075701.06bfced2@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
On Fri, 10 Dec 2021, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Dec 2021 16:36:06 +0100 Matthieu Baerts wrote:
>>> Actually, I take that back, let's hear from Mat, he may want to take
>>> the patch via his tree.
>>
>> We "rebase" our tree on top of net-next every night. I think for such
>> small patches with no behaviour change and sent directly to netdev ML,
>> it is probably best to apply them directly. I can check with Mat if it
>> is an issue if you prefer.
>
> Please do, I'm happy to apply the patch but Mat usually prefers to take
> things thru MPTCP tree.
>
Jakub -
It is ok with me if you apply this now, for the reasons Matthieu cited.
The usual division of labor between Matthieu and I as MPTCP co-maintainers
usually has me upstreaming the patches to netdev, but I do trust
Matthieu's judgement on sending out Reviewed-by tags and advising direct
appliction to the netdev trees! Also, much like you & David, having offset
timezones can be helpful.
Also appreciate your awareness of the normal patch flow for MPTCP, and
that you're checking that we're all on the same page.
>> I would have applied it in our MPTCP tree if we were sending PR, not to
>> bother you for such patches but I guess it is best not to have us
>> sending this patch a second time later :)
>>
>> BTW, if you prefer us sending PR over batches of patches, please tell us!
>
> Small preference for patches. It's good to have the code on the ML for
> everyone to look at and mixed PR + patches are a tiny bit more clicking
> for me.
>
Good to know.
Thanks!
--
Mat Martineau
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-10 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-10 7:14 [PATCH] selftests: mptcp: remove duplicate include in mptcp_inq.c cgel.zte
2021-12-10 9:58 ` Matthieu Baerts
2021-12-10 14:54 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-12-10 14:56 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-12-10 15:36 ` Matthieu Baerts
2021-12-10 15:57 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-12-10 18:00 ` Mat Martineau [this message]
2021-12-10 19:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7041cc47-3728-c033-bc97-49d86a1938b9@linux.intel.com \
--to=mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com \
--cc=cgel.zte@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthieu.baerts@tessares.net \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=ye.guojin@zte.com.cn \
--cc=zealci@zte.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox