From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [pdx86-platform-drivers-x86:review-hans 46/59] kernel/stop_machine.c:638:35: error: call to undeclared function 'cpu_smt_mask'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 15:40:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <70616a41-fe5f-aff8-2aca-4cb827e8553f@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r14zvuxp.ffs@tglx>
Hi,
On 5/12/22 13:42, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, May 12 2022 at 11:53, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> On 5/12/22 11:24, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 12 2022 at 09:29, kernel test robot wrote:
>>>>>> kernel/stop_machine.c:638:35: error: call to undeclared function 'cpu_smt_mask'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>>>> const struct cpumask *smt_mask = cpu_smt_mask(cpu);
>>>
>>> This warning with W=1 is not the worst of the problems.
>>>
>>> The build will simply fail for CONFIG_SMP=y && CONFIG_SCHED_SMT=n
>>> because cpu_smt_mask() cannot be resolved.
>>>
>>> The other issue is CONFIG_SMP=n. This will fail to build the IFS driver
>>> because stop_core_cpuslocked() is not available for SMP=n.
>>
>> The IFS Kconfig already depends on SMP :
>>
>> config INTEL_IFS
>> tristate "Intel In Field Scan"
>> depends on X86 && 64BIT && SMP
>> select INTEL_IFS_DEVICE
>> help
>> Enable ...
>>
>>
>> So I don't think we need the non-SMP implementation inside
>> include/linux/stop_machine.h, we only need the #ifdef you
>> suggest in kernel/stop_machine.c ?
>
> For the case at hand that's sufficient.
>
>> I think it is best to just squash this into the original
>> patch, do you agree ?
>
> Yes.
Ok, I've squashed the #ifdef into kernel/stop_machine.c and done
a forced push. Lets hope that the kernel test robot (lkp) does
not find anything else.
Regards,
Hans
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-12 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-12 1:29 [pdx86-platform-drivers-x86:review-hans 46/59] kernel/stop_machine.c:638:35: error: call to undeclared function 'cpu_smt_mask'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations kernel test robot
2022-05-12 9:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-12 9:53 ` Hans de Goede
2022-05-12 11:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-12 13:40 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=70616a41-fe5f-aff8-2aca-4cb827e8553f@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox