From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bod@kernel.org>
To: Vikash Garodia <quic_vgarodia@quicinc.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.k.varbanov@gmail.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Reup: SM8350 and SC8280XP venus support
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2025 10:02:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <70891a99-d2ca-4fd3-a88d-2f66a9a78f66@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1dd6e03d-09be-4853-741a-4fb47b7619a0@quicinc.com>
On 04/04/2025 06:24, Vikash Garodia wrote:
>>> How different is this from sm8250 which is already enabled on iris driver ?
>> As far as I remember, SM8250 support in Iris did not reach
>> feature-parity yet. So in my opinion it is fine to add new platforms to
>> the Venus driver, that will later migrate to the Iris driver.
> I would say, from decoder side all codecs are there now on Iris. H264 merged,
> while h265 and VP9 dec are posted as RFC, there is one compliance failure which
> is under debug to post them as regular patches.
> If we are mainly looking for decode usecases, then we should be on Iris.
> Preference would be to stay on Iris, otherwise we would have that extra ask to
> port it later from venus to iris.
Right now venus represents 9/20 - 45% of the patches being churned for
sc8280xp.
https://github.com/jhovold/linux/tree/wip/sc8280xp-6.14-rc7
This is a good debate to have, however my memory of what we collectively
agreed both in public and private was to continue to merge new silicon
<= HFI6XX into venus unless and until iris hit feature parity for HFI6XX
and to continue with venus at that point for < HFI6XX.
So merging sc8280xp - HFI6XX is consistent with our agreement, the right
thing to do for our users and a big win in terms of technical debt
reduction.
I will post an update to this series ASAP.
---
bod
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-04 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-04 13:07 [PATCH 0/8] Reup: SM8350 and SC8280XP venus support Bryan O'Donoghue
2025-03-04 13:07 ` [PATCH 1/8] media: dt-bindings: Document SC8280XP/SM8350 Venus Bryan O'Donoghue
2025-03-04 14:00 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-03-04 16:48 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2025-03-05 3:36 ` Vikash Garodia
2025-03-04 13:07 ` [PATCH 2/8] media: venus: core: Remove trailing commas from of match entries Bryan O'Donoghue
2025-03-04 13:07 ` [PATCH 3/8] media: venus: hfi_venus: Support only updating certain bits with presets Bryan O'Donoghue
2025-03-04 13:07 ` [PATCH 4/8] media: platform: venus: Add optional LLCC path Bryan O'Donoghue
2025-03-08 17:44 ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-03-04 13:07 ` [PATCH 5/8] media: venus: core: Add SM8350 resource struct Bryan O'Donoghue
2025-03-04 20:54 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-03-04 13:07 ` [PATCH 6/8] media: venus: core: Add SC8280XP " Bryan O'Donoghue
2025-03-04 20:54 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-03-04 13:07 ` [PATCH 7/8] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: Add Venus Bryan O'Donoghue
2025-03-04 14:02 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-03-04 16:41 ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-03-04 16:49 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2025-03-04 16:50 ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-03-04 20:55 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-03-04 13:07 ` [PATCH 8/8] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp-x13s: Enable Venus Bryan O'Donoghue
2025-03-05 3:19 ` [PATCH 0/8] Reup: SM8350 and SC8280XP venus support Vikash Garodia
2025-03-05 9:37 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2025-04-03 16:58 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-04-04 5:24 ` Vikash Garodia
2025-04-04 9:02 ` Bryan O'Donoghue [this message]
2025-04-04 10:33 ` Vikash Garodia
2025-05-27 10:53 ` Johan Hovold
2025-05-28 14:15 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-04-05 14:48 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=70891a99-d2ca-4fd3-a88d-2f66a9a78f66@kernel.org \
--to=bod@kernel.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=johan+linaro@kernel.org \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=quic_vgarodia@quicinc.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=stanimir.k.varbanov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox