From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
rafael@kernel.org
Cc: rui.zhang@intel.com, amit.kucheria@verdurent.com,
amit.kachhap@gmail.com, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
viresh.kumar@linaro.org, len.brown@intel.com, pavel@ucw.cz,
Pierre.Gondois@arm.com, ionela.voinescu@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, mhiramat@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/17] PM: EM: Add update_power() callback for runtime modifications
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 11:31:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <70e630b8-e577-a148-0179-61aedf910c09@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230512095743.3393563-7-lukasz.luba@arm.com>
On 12/05/2023 11:57, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> The Energy Model (EM) is going to support runtime modifications. This
> new callback would be used in the upcoming EM changes. The drivers
> or frameworks which want to modify the EM have to implement the
> update_power() callback and provide it via EM API
> em_dev_update_perf_domain(). The callback is then used by the EM
> framework to get new power values for each frequency in existing EM.
Do we have any numbers or feedback that the chosen design (i.e. update
per performance state through update_power()) is performant enough for
the anticipated use case on real devices?
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
> ---
> include/linux/energy_model.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/energy_model.h b/include/linux/energy_model.h
> index 8069f526c9d8..cc2bf607191e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/energy_model.h
> +++ b/include/linux/energy_model.h
> @@ -158,6 +158,26 @@ struct em_data_callback {
> */
> int (*get_cost)(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq,
> unsigned long *cost);
> +
> + /**
> + * update_power() - Provide new power at the given performance state of
> + * a device
> + * @dev : Device for which we do this operation (can be a CPU)
> + * @freq : Frequency at the performance state in kHz
> + * @power : New power value at the performance state
> + * (modified)
> + * @priv : Pointer to private data useful for tracking context
> + * during run-time modifications of EM.
> + *
> + * The update_power() is used by run-time modifiable EM. It aims to
> + * provide updated power value for a given frequency, which is stored
> + * in the performance state. The power value provided by this callback
> + * should fit in the [0, EM_MAX_POWER] range.
> + *
> + * Return 0 on success, or appropriate error value in case of failure.
> + */
> + int (*update_power)(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq,
> + unsigned long *power, void *priv);
> };
> #define EM_SET_ACTIVE_POWER_CB(em_cb, cb) ((em_cb).active_power = cb)
> #define EM_ADV_DATA_CB(_active_power_cb, _cost_cb) \
> @@ -165,6 +185,7 @@ struct em_data_callback {
> .get_cost = _cost_cb }
> #define EM_DATA_CB(_active_power_cb) \
> EM_ADV_DATA_CB(_active_power_cb, NULL)
> +#define EM_UPDATE_CB(_update_power_cb) { .update_power = &_update_power_cb }
>
> struct em_perf_domain *em_cpu_get(int cpu);
> struct em_perf_domain *em_pd_get(struct device *dev);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-30 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-12 9:57 [PATCH v2 00/17] Introduce runtime modifiable Energy Model Lukasz Luba
2023-05-12 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 01/17] PM: EM: Refactor em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies() arguments Lukasz Luba
2023-05-12 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 02/17] PM: EM: Find first CPU online while updating OPP efficiency Lukasz Luba
2023-05-12 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 03/17] PM: EM: Refactor em_pd_get_efficient_state() to be more flexible Lukasz Luba
2023-05-30 11:06 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-07-03 16:22 ` Lukasz Luba
2023-05-12 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 04/17] PM: EM: Create a new function em_compute_costs() Lukasz Luba
2023-05-30 9:51 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-07-03 15:09 ` Lukasz Luba
2023-05-12 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 05/17] trace: energy_model: Add trace event for EM runtime modifications Lukasz Luba
2023-05-30 10:03 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-07-03 15:53 ` Lukasz Luba
2023-05-12 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 06/17] PM: EM: Add update_power() callback for " Lukasz Luba
2023-05-30 9:31 ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
2023-07-03 15:06 ` Lukasz Luba
2023-05-12 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 07/17] PM: EM: Check if the get_cost() callback is present in em_compute_costs() Lukasz Luba
2023-05-12 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 08/17] PM: EM: Introduce runtime modifiable table Lukasz Luba
2023-05-14 4:28 ` kernel test robot
2023-05-30 10:18 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-07-03 15:58 ` Lukasz Luba
2023-05-12 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 09/17] PM: EM: Add RCU mechanism which safely cleans the old data Lukasz Luba
2023-05-30 10:02 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-07-03 15:49 ` Lukasz Luba
2023-05-12 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 10/17] PM: EM: Add runtime update interface to modify EM power Lukasz Luba
2023-05-12 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 11/17] PM: EM: Use runtime modified EM for CPUs energy estimation in EAS Lukasz Luba
2023-05-12 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 12/17] PM: EM: Add argument to get_cost() for runtime modification Lukasz Luba
2023-05-30 9:53 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-07-03 15:30 ` Lukasz Luba
2023-05-12 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 13/17] PM: EM: Refactor struct em_perf_domain and add default_table Lukasz Luba
2023-05-30 10:23 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-07-03 16:00 ` Lukasz Luba
2023-05-12 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 14/17] Documentation: EM: Add a new section about the design Lukasz Luba
2023-05-30 10:33 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-07-03 16:09 ` Lukasz Luba
2023-05-12 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 15/17] Documentation: EM: Add a runtime modifiable EM design description Lukasz Luba
2023-05-30 10:42 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-07-03 16:13 ` Lukasz Luba
2023-05-12 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 16/17] Documentation: EM: Add example with driver modifying the EM Lukasz Luba
2023-05-12 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 17/17] Documentation: EM: Describe the API of runtime modifications Lukasz Luba
2023-05-24 17:25 ` [PATCH v2 00/17] Introduce runtime modifiable Energy Model Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-07-03 11:08 ` Lukasz Luba
2023-05-30 11:07 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-07-03 16:35 ` Lukasz Luba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=70e630b8-e577-a148-0179-61aedf910c09@arm.com \
--to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=Pierre.Gondois@arm.com \
--cc=amit.kachhap@gmail.com \
--cc=amit.kucheria@verdurent.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox