From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB65CC43381 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 19:57:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96D8120835 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 19:57:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=efficios.com header.i=@efficios.com header.b="UUDzN4Mu" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726323AbfCDT5t (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Mar 2019 14:57:49 -0500 Received: from mail.efficios.com ([167.114.142.138]:55402 "EHLO mail.efficios.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726038AbfCDT5t (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Mar 2019 14:57:49 -0500 Received: from localhost (ip6-localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.efficios.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 290A81BBC38; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 14:57:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.efficios.com ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mail02.efficios.com [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id KslfnKAy90pO; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 14:57:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (ip6-localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.efficios.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2C1C1BBC30; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 14:57:47 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 mail.efficios.com A2C1C1BBC30 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=efficios.com; s=default; t=1551729467; bh=TH5ubesnfb1c/kbubK4G3B/KJ4MNpDe09E8yjpKByI8=; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=UUDzN4Mu7PoTzWlPDoUt9l8ySGU5Eggav2bSToK6vZMBOF3XK3xvmbP/+89MyBdhI d3GslJfAxTrtgGEiYmuKUanVdcmZ55Cj47qSlmDhluPYPxZNK6pdGJQ6xAd8bOqHdN xi15fUcCHVOLUcZ/Vj+XFvmW9dlKDBsVIonZz7SvB4rHaJ2gS7znS90Ch6yWKt5lXD La/FPy6H+WJKYk4SAi7Ynj0OmkNz4YTwsBJswds6UslYcxVcJvonmbbJqcYirID+mJ 9jEilAXgjTCE5NhaZ4PZR99O9vupXoEcLLOsit8dq7oWsntja6Md2OV2mxY1ej1YDx 3VXmB/MRsoy5w== X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at efficios.com Received: from mail.efficios.com ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mail02.efficios.com [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id Ktd0K1f4Xx73; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 14:57:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail02.efficios.com (mail02.efficios.com [167.114.142.138]) by mail.efficios.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EB4C1BBC1E; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 14:57:47 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 14:57:47 -0500 (EST) From: Mathieu Desnoyers To: Souptick Joarder Cc: Peter Zijlstra , paulmck , Boqun Feng , shuah , linux-kernel , linux-kselftest Message-ID: <712691085.1137.1551729467392.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20190304183827.GA6809@jordon-HP-15-Notebook-PC> <20190304184958.GR32494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftest/rseq: Remove duplicate header MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [167.114.142.138] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.8.10_GA_3758 (ZimbraWebClient - FF65 (Linux)/8.8.10_GA_3745) Thread-Topic: selftest/rseq: Remove duplicate header Thread-Index: mh5Zrflal6JYyMUvhsfiXmFbUjIsRQ== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ----- On Mar 4, 2019, at 1:53 PM, Souptick Joarder jrdr.linux@gmail.com wrote: > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 12:20 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> >> On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 12:08:27AM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote: >> > Remove duplicate header which is included twice >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Sabyasachi Gupta >> > Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder >> >> That SoB chain is invalid. > > I didn't get why it is invalid ? I think it's about having the author of the patch (From) as first Signed-off-by, and then apply following Signed-off-by by maintainers who pick up the patch. (That's what I am used to see) What is the intent behind the second Signed-off-by by Sabyasachi Gupta ? Thanks, Mathieu -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com