The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	andrew@lunn.ch
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Mateusz Polchlopek <mateusz.polchlopek@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: Remove redundant variable declaration in __dev_change_flags()
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 09:35:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <715a9dd2-4309-436d-bdfc-716932ccb95c@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250217-old_flags-v2-1-4cda3b43a35f@debian.org>

Le 17/02/2025 à 16:48, Breno Leitao a écrit :
> The old_flags variable is declared twice in __dev_change_flags(),
> causing a shadow variable warning. This patch fixes the issue by
> removing the redundant declaration, reusing the existing old_flags
> variable instead.
> 
> 	net/core/dev.c:9225:16: warning: declaration shadows a local variable [-Wshadow]
> 	9225 |                 unsigned int old_flags = dev->flags;
> 	|                              ^
> 	net/core/dev.c:9185:15: note: previous declaration is here
> 	9185 |         unsigned int old_flags = dev->flags;
> 	|                      ^
> 	1 warning generated.
> 
> Remove the redundant inner declaration and reuse the existing old_flags
> variable since its value is not needed outside the if block, and it is
> safe to reuse the variable. This eliminates the warning while
> maintaining the same functionality.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
> Reviewed-by: Mateusz Polchlopek <mateusz.polchlopek@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-18  8:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-17 15:48 [PATCH net-next v2] net: Remove redundant variable declaration in __dev_change_flags() Breno Leitao
2025-02-18  2:55 ` Kalesh Anakkur Purayil
2025-02-18  8:35 ` Nicolas Dichtel [this message]
2025-02-18 13:53   ` Andrew Lunn
2025-02-19  2:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=715a9dd2-4309-436d-bdfc-716932ccb95c@6wind.com \
    --to=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mateusz.polchlopek@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox