From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Erwan Velu <erwanaliasr1@gmail.com>
Cc: Erwan Velu <e.velu@criteo.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] i40e: Prevent setting MTU if greater than MFS
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 11:01:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7169b33e1e4487370a530fb60d97dc096a24acfc.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240312094259.770554-1-e.velu@criteo.com>
Hi,
On Tue, 2024-03-12 at 10:42 +0100, Erwan Velu wrote:
> Commit 6871a7de705b6f6a4046f0d19da9bcd689c3bc8e from iPXE project is
Please use the checkpatch-friendly commit reference: <12char hash>
("<title>")
> setting the MFS to 0x600 = 1536.
>
> At boot time the i40e driver complains about it with
> the following message but continues.
>
> MFS for port 1 has been set below the default: 600
>
> If the MTU size is increased, the driver accept it but large packets will not
> be processed by the firmware generating tx_errors. The issue is pretty
> silent for users. i.e doing TCP in such context will generates lots of
> retransmissions until the proper window size (below 1500) will be used.
>
> To fix this case, it would have been ideal to increase the MFS,
> via i40e_aqc_opc_set_mac_config, incoming patch will take care of it.
>
> At least, this commit prevents setting up an MTU greater than the current MFS.
> It will avoid being in the position of having an MTU set to 9000 on the
> netdev with a firmware refusing packets larger than 1536.
This looks like a legit fix that should target the 'net' tree, @Tony:
do you agree?
If so, Erwan, please include a suitable fixes tag in the next revision.
Please include into the subj prefix a suitable target tree. I think
this should go first via the intel tree for testing, so 'iwl-net'
should fit.
In any case please respect the 24h grace period when posting on netdev:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst#L399
Cheers,
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-12 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-12 9:42 [PATCH v3] i40e: Prevent setting MTU if greater than MFS Erwan Velu
2024-03-12 9:48 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Paul Menzel
2024-03-12 10:18 ` Erwan Velu
2024-03-12 10:01 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2024-03-12 10:29 ` Erwan Velu
2024-03-12 22:07 ` Tony Nguyen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7169b33e1e4487370a530fb60d97dc096a24acfc.camel@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=e.velu@criteo.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=erwanaliasr1@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox