From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-179.mta1.migadu.com (out-179.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E157E372B39 for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:34:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.179 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776569698; cv=none; b=o1vvLo3o+Mp9flOe3I0cg+STnIe0vxSVkSJeizwiQvvHeb6Az5wb2x1N7SzNzgO2/JK6t9Kmv0VqcgCxEPo0z7UZDii38SSDLAHXHe8JiusnoXmb0MdIgYAXOGmuYcM/BWzhW2G4ejop2yvqQ5a+cDR+N75fa1/3BnvfIdZp+mg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776569698; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ofQiTMHl4DWKqY/+S2NOYeSF5dxNp7Ur5u8hVXEiVjY=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=j4+p7C1tfV37d4SCOBuy2uZ3qe3wBiTkJzOal+CDaxwkVXIkbQm09q3uwuweAgiGAv0cKPex23w8BwhcGtqNW+3mGtU1vSjdQrT8kTFWnMiX2mvw7aYmta0aEx3rhD338klLMeRvroESK1TpYvLCnNH/GBrjiQleAvRqizLI1tc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=Q2IzFVWB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.179 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="Q2IzFVWB" Message-ID: <7176fdf5-55ed-4e95-ba15-52286975eccb@linux.dev> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1776569685; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=6DtKdbUbvKyMZZwB9YhEiF+u1y7IWhOmIfywqditr5c=; b=Q2IzFVWBDZU9cvt6m6iOr/5FDr5G87q9FwawivRw/8Un+F+jDkipceof/UB6Gqi64lMB/x tnXIAEp/00TFZEoGqYMvzupiCMUEGABb3tbdE6AgZeTBke9XnAy80XS4/mu8C/YWIJsns2 dbxoDKt1Bpv/HCSFB9Wok2tKjNl6RWE= Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2026 20:34:33 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] RDMA/rxe: reject non-8-byte ATOMIC_WRITE payloads To: Michael Bommarito , "yanjun.zhu@linux.dev" Cc: Zhu Yanjun , Jason Gunthorpe , Leon Romanovsky , Xiao Yang , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20260418162141.3610201-1-michael.bommarito@gmail.com> <06470bbf-ee39-4094-8c01-5860935af0f8@linux.dev> <1bd36ce7-e3dd-4ff5-867a-b8b9ade90a1e@linux.dev> X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Zhu Yanjun In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT 在 2026/4/18 18:57, Michael Bommarito 写道: > On Sat, Apr 18, 2026 at 7:18 PM Zhu Yanjun wrote: >> The fix should stand on its own, and the test case can be added as a >> follow-up patch under tools/testing/selftests/rdma (or rdma-core if more appropriate). >> This keeps each patch focused on a single logical change and makes review easier. > It seems like mainlining rdma tests might not be a good idea. I found > the last time here: > Kamal Heib, 23 Oct 2019 — [PATCH for-next] selftests: rdma: Add rdma tests > > I put the tests here and will PR it into linux-rdma/rdma-core tomorrow: > https://github.com/mjbommar/rdma-core/blob/4104d991a764de4aad9f645a2f0ec723f6076209/tests/test_rxe_atomic_write_oob.py Thanks a lot. I am fine with the above link. Zhu Yanjun > > Thanks, > Mike Bommarito -- Best Regards, Yanjun.Zhu