From: Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>
To: Daniel Elstner <daniel.elstner@gmx.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: reiserfs+lndir problem [was: 2.4.4 SMP: spurious EOVERFLOW "Value too large for defined data type"]
Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 18:48:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <71770000.988757331@tiny> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010502004152.23a0751b.daniel@master.daniel.homenet>
On Wednesday, May 02, 2001 12:41:52 AM +0200 Daniel Elstner
<daniel.elstner@gmx.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2001 21:03:47 -0400 Chris Mason <mason@suse.com> wrote:
>
>> > Apparently it's a reiserfs/symlink problem.
>> > I tried doing the lndir on an ext2 partition, sources still
>> > on reiserfs. And it worked just fine!
>>
>> Neat, thanks for the extra details. Does that mean you can consistently
>> repeat on reiserfs now? What happens when you do the lndir on reiserfs
>> and diff the directories?
>
> I just played around a bit with the following results:
>
> sources on reiserfs, lndir on reiserfs -> make fails, diff ok
> sources on reiserfs, lndir on ext2 -> make ok
> sources on ext2, lndir on reiserfs -> make fails, diff ok
>
> Doing the diff against a second copy of the tree shows no errors, too.
> Always the same behaviour: You have to run lndir at least twice to
> get the error. If the link tree was already set up after a boot, the
> error occurs only after rm + lndir + rm + lndir.
>
> There's a strange way to get things working just like after a reboot.
> After diff'ing the link tree with the 2nd copy (both on reiserfs),
> make World won't fail - at least once.
Ok, can you reproduce with a set of sources other than X? I would leave
glibc alone for now, unless you can reproduce on ext2.
-chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-01 22:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-30 18:56 2.4.4 SMP: spurious EOVERFLOW "Value too large for defined data type" Daniel Elstner
2001-04-30 20:09 ` Daniel Elstner
2001-04-30 20:55 ` reiserfs+lndir problem [was: 2.4.4 SMP: spurious EOVERFLOW "Value too large for defined data type"] Daniel Elstner
2001-05-01 1:03 ` Chris Mason
2001-05-01 22:41 ` Daniel Elstner
2001-05-01 22:48 ` Chris Mason [this message]
2001-05-02 20:41 ` Daniel Elstner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=71770000.988757331@tiny \
--to=mason@suse.com \
--cc=daniel.elstner@gmx.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox