Re: [PATCH v3] sched/fair: don't assign runtime for throttled cfs_rq

[Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>]

On 26/08/2019 13:16, Liangyan wrote:
> do_sched_cfs_period_timer() will refill cfs_b runtime and call
> distribute_cfs_runtime to unthrottle cfs_rq, sometimes cfs_b->runtime
> will allocate all quota to one cfs_rq incorrectly, then other cfs_rqs
> attached to this cfs_b can't get runtime and will be throttled.
> 
> We find that one throttled cfs_rq has non-negative
> cfs_rq->runtime_remaining and cause an unexpetced cast from s64 to u64
> in snippet: distribute_cfs_runtime() {
> runtime = -cfs_rq->runtime_remaining + 1; }.
> The runtime here will change to a large number and consume all
> cfs_b->runtime in this cfs_b period.
> 
> According to Ben Segall, the throttled cfs_rq can have
> account_cfs_rq_runtime called on it because it is throttled before
> idle_balance, and the idle_balance calls update_rq_clock to add time
> that is accounted to the task.
> 
> This commit prevents cfs_rq to be assgined new runtime if it has been
> throttled until that distribute_cfs_runtime is called.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Liangyan <liangyan.peng@linux.alibaba.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>

@Peter/Ingo, if we care about it I believe it can't hurt to strap

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Fixes: d3d9dc330236 ("sched: Throttle entities exceeding their allowed bandwidth")

to the thing.