* [PATCH] Revert "intel_idle: Rescan "dead" SMT siblings during, initialization"
@ 2025-08-28 14:25 Christian Loehle
2025-08-28 14:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christian Loehle @ 2025-08-28 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-pm, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Artem Bityutskiy
This reverts commit a430c11f401589a0f4f57fd398271a5d85142c7a.
Calling arch_cpu_rescan_dead_smt_siblings() in intel_idle_init with
boot parameter nosmt and maxcpus active hotplugged boot-offline CPUs
in (and leave them online) which weren't supposed to be online.
With the revert and nosmt and maxcpus=12 on a raptor lake:
cpu online capacity
cpu0 1 1009
cpu1 0 -
cpu2 1 1009
cpu3 0 -
cpu4 1 1009
cpu5 0 -
cpu6 1 1009
cpu7 0 -
cpu8 1 1024
cpu9 0 -
cpu10 1 1024
cpu11 0 -
cpu12 1 1009
cpu13 0 -
cpu14 1 1009
cpu15 0 -
cpu16 1 623
cpu17 1 623
cpu18 1 623
cpu19 1 623
cpu20 0 -
cpu21 0 -
cpu22 0 -
cpu23 0 -
Previously:
cpu online capacity
cpu0 1 1009
cpu1 0 -
cpu2 1 1009
cpu3 0 -
cpu4 1 1009
cpu5 0 -
cpu6 1 1009
cpu7 0 -
cpu8 1 1024
cpu9 0 -
cpu10 1 1024
cpu11 0 -
cpu12 1 1009
cpu13 0 -
cpu14 1 1009
cpu15 0 -
cpu16 1 623
cpu17 1 623
cpu18 1 623
cpu19 1 623
cpu20 1 623
cpu21 1 623
cpu22 1 623
cpu23 1 623
Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
---
Rafael, I don't immediately see how to fix this properly so I won't
try to, feel free to treat this as a bug report.
drivers/idle/intel_idle.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c b/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
index 91a7b7e7c0c8..a9c58395a425 100644
--- a/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
+++ b/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
@@ -2507,8 +2507,6 @@ static int __init intel_idle_init(void)
pr_debug("Local APIC timer is reliable in %s\n",
boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARAT) ? "all C-states" : "C1");
- arch_cpu_rescan_dead_smt_siblings();
-
return 0;
hp_setup_fail:
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] Revert "intel_idle: Rescan "dead" SMT siblings during, initialization"
2025-08-28 14:25 [PATCH] Revert "intel_idle: Rescan "dead" SMT siblings during, initialization" Christian Loehle
@ 2025-08-28 14:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-08-28 16:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2025-08-28 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Loehle
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-pm, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Artem Bityutskiy
On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 4:26 PM Christian Loehle
<christian.loehle@arm.com> wrote:
>
> This reverts commit a430c11f401589a0f4f57fd398271a5d85142c7a.
>
> Calling arch_cpu_rescan_dead_smt_siblings() in intel_idle_init with
> boot parameter nosmt and maxcpus active hotplugged boot-offline CPUs
> in (and leave them online) which weren't supposed to be online.
>
> With the revert and nosmt and maxcpus=12 on a raptor lake:
> cpu online capacity
> cpu0 1 1009
> cpu1 0 -
> cpu2 1 1009
> cpu3 0 -
> cpu4 1 1009
> cpu5 0 -
> cpu6 1 1009
> cpu7 0 -
> cpu8 1 1024
> cpu9 0 -
> cpu10 1 1024
> cpu11 0 -
> cpu12 1 1009
> cpu13 0 -
> cpu14 1 1009
> cpu15 0 -
> cpu16 1 623
> cpu17 1 623
> cpu18 1 623
> cpu19 1 623
> cpu20 0 -
> cpu21 0 -
> cpu22 0 -
> cpu23 0 -
>
> Previously:
> cpu online capacity
> cpu0 1 1009
> cpu1 0 -
> cpu2 1 1009
> cpu3 0 -
> cpu4 1 1009
> cpu5 0 -
> cpu6 1 1009
> cpu7 0 -
> cpu8 1 1024
> cpu9 0 -
> cpu10 1 1024
> cpu11 0 -
> cpu12 1 1009
> cpu13 0 -
> cpu14 1 1009
> cpu15 0 -
> cpu16 1 623
> cpu17 1 623
> cpu18 1 623
> cpu19 1 623
> cpu20 1 623
> cpu21 1 623
> cpu22 1 623
> cpu23 1 623
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
> ---
> Rafael, I don't immediately see how to fix this properly so I won't
> try to, feel free to treat this as a bug report.
Sure, thanks for reporting this!
Well, I think that cpuhp_smt_enable() is missing a check. It looks to
me like it should do the topology_is_primary_thread(cpu) check like
cpuhp_smt_disable().
I'll cut a test patch for this later.
> drivers/idle/intel_idle.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c b/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
> index 91a7b7e7c0c8..a9c58395a425 100644
> --- a/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
> +++ b/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
> @@ -2507,8 +2507,6 @@ static int __init intel_idle_init(void)
> pr_debug("Local APIC timer is reliable in %s\n",
> boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARAT) ? "all C-states" : "C1");
>
> - arch_cpu_rescan_dead_smt_siblings();
> -
> return 0;
>
> hp_setup_fail:
> --
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] Revert "intel_idle: Rescan "dead" SMT siblings during, initialization"
2025-08-28 14:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2025-08-28 16:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-08-28 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2025-08-28 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Loehle; +Cc: linux-pm, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Artem Bityutskiy
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2350 bytes --]
On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 4:44 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 4:26 PM Christian Loehle
> <christian.loehle@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > This reverts commit a430c11f401589a0f4f57fd398271a5d85142c7a.
> >
> > Calling arch_cpu_rescan_dead_smt_siblings() in intel_idle_init with
> > boot parameter nosmt and maxcpus active hotplugged boot-offline CPUs
> > in (and leave them online) which weren't supposed to be online.
> >
> > With the revert and nosmt and maxcpus=12 on a raptor lake:
> > cpu online capacity
> > cpu0 1 1009
> > cpu1 0 -
> > cpu2 1 1009
> > cpu3 0 -
> > cpu4 1 1009
> > cpu5 0 -
> > cpu6 1 1009
> > cpu7 0 -
> > cpu8 1 1024
> > cpu9 0 -
> > cpu10 1 1024
> > cpu11 0 -
> > cpu12 1 1009
> > cpu13 0 -
> > cpu14 1 1009
> > cpu15 0 -
> > cpu16 1 623
> > cpu17 1 623
> > cpu18 1 623
> > cpu19 1 623
> > cpu20 0 -
> > cpu21 0 -
> > cpu22 0 -
> > cpu23 0 -
> >
> > Previously:
> > cpu online capacity
> > cpu0 1 1009
> > cpu1 0 -
> > cpu2 1 1009
> > cpu3 0 -
> > cpu4 1 1009
> > cpu5 0 -
> > cpu6 1 1009
> > cpu7 0 -
> > cpu8 1 1024
> > cpu9 0 -
> > cpu10 1 1024
> > cpu11 0 -
> > cpu12 1 1009
> > cpu13 0 -
> > cpu14 1 1009
> > cpu15 0 -
> > cpu16 1 623
> > cpu17 1 623
> > cpu18 1 623
> > cpu19 1 623
> > cpu20 1 623
> > cpu21 1 623
> > cpu22 1 623
> > cpu23 1 623
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
> > ---
> > Rafael, I don't immediately see how to fix this properly so I won't
> > try to, feel free to treat this as a bug report.
>
> Sure, thanks for reporting this!
>
> Well, I think that cpuhp_smt_enable() is missing a check. It looks to
> me like it should do the topology_is_primary_thread(cpu) check like
> cpuhp_smt_disable().
>
> I'll cut a test patch for this later.
Something like the attached one, perhaps. I haven't tested it yet,
but I'll do that later.
[-- Attachment #2: kernel-cpu-enable-smt.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 505 bytes --]
---
kernel/cpu.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -2710,6 +2710,13 @@
cpu_maps_update_begin();
cpu_smt_control = CPU_SMT_ENABLED;
for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
+ /*
+ * Avoid accidentally onlining primary thread CPUs that have
+ * been taken offline.
+ */
+ if (topology_is_primary_thread(cpu))
+ continue;
+
/* Skip online CPUs and CPUs on offline nodes */
if (cpu_online(cpu) || !node_online(cpu_to_node(cpu)))
continue;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] Revert "intel_idle: Rescan "dead" SMT siblings during, initialization"
2025-08-28 16:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2025-08-28 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-08-28 21:44 ` Christian Loehle
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2025-08-28 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Loehle; +Cc: linux-pm, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Artem Bityutskiy
On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 6:13 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 4:44 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 4:26 PM Christian Loehle
> > <christian.loehle@arm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > This reverts commit a430c11f401589a0f4f57fd398271a5d85142c7a.
> > >
> > > Calling arch_cpu_rescan_dead_smt_siblings() in intel_idle_init with
> > > boot parameter nosmt and maxcpus active hotplugged boot-offline CPUs
> > > in (and leave them online) which weren't supposed to be online.
> > >
> > > With the revert and nosmt and maxcpus=12 on a raptor lake:
> > > cpu online capacity
> > > cpu0 1 1009
> > > cpu1 0 -
> > > cpu2 1 1009
> > > cpu3 0 -
> > > cpu4 1 1009
> > > cpu5 0 -
> > > cpu6 1 1009
> > > cpu7 0 -
> > > cpu8 1 1024
> > > cpu9 0 -
> > > cpu10 1 1024
> > > cpu11 0 -
> > > cpu12 1 1009
> > > cpu13 0 -
> > > cpu14 1 1009
> > > cpu15 0 -
> > > cpu16 1 623
> > > cpu17 1 623
> > > cpu18 1 623
> > > cpu19 1 623
> > > cpu20 0 -
> > > cpu21 0 -
> > > cpu22 0 -
> > > cpu23 0 -
> > >
> > > Previously:
> > > cpu online capacity
> > > cpu0 1 1009
> > > cpu1 0 -
> > > cpu2 1 1009
> > > cpu3 0 -
> > > cpu4 1 1009
> > > cpu5 0 -
> > > cpu6 1 1009
> > > cpu7 0 -
> > > cpu8 1 1024
> > > cpu9 0 -
> > > cpu10 1 1024
> > > cpu11 0 -
> > > cpu12 1 1009
> > > cpu13 0 -
> > > cpu14 1 1009
> > > cpu15 0 -
> > > cpu16 1 623
> > > cpu17 1 623
> > > cpu18 1 623
> > > cpu19 1 623
> > > cpu20 1 623
> > > cpu21 1 623
> > > cpu22 1 623
> > > cpu23 1 623
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
> > > ---
> > > Rafael, I don't immediately see how to fix this properly so I won't
> > > try to, feel free to treat this as a bug report.
> >
> > Sure, thanks for reporting this!
> >
> > Well, I think that cpuhp_smt_enable() is missing a check. It looks to
> > me like it should do the topology_is_primary_thread(cpu) check like
> > cpuhp_smt_disable().
> >
> > I'll cut a test patch for this later.
>
> Something like the attached one, perhaps. I haven't tested it yet,
> but I'll do that later.
Works here AFAICS, but my test system is not hybrid.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Revert "intel_idle: Rescan "dead" SMT siblings during, initialization"
2025-08-28 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2025-08-28 21:44 ` Christian Loehle
2025-08-29 17:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christian Loehle @ 2025-08-28 21:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: linux-pm, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Artem Bityutskiy
On 8/28/25 20:06, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 6:13 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 4:44 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 4:26 PM Christian Loehle
>>> <christian.loehle@arm.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This reverts commit a430c11f401589a0f4f57fd398271a5d85142c7a.
>>>>
>>>> Calling arch_cpu_rescan_dead_smt_siblings() in intel_idle_init with
>>>> boot parameter nosmt and maxcpus active hotplugged boot-offline CPUs
>>>> in (and leave them online) which weren't supposed to be online.
>>>>
>>>> With the revert and nosmt and maxcpus=12 on a raptor lake:
>>>> cpu online capacity
>>>> cpu0 1 1009
>>>> cpu1 0 -
>>>> cpu2 1 1009
>>>> cpu3 0 -
>>>> cpu4 1 1009
>>>> cpu5 0 -
>>>> cpu6 1 1009
>>>> cpu7 0 -
>>>> cpu8 1 1024
>>>> cpu9 0 -
>>>> cpu10 1 1024
>>>> cpu11 0 -
>>>> cpu12 1 1009
>>>> cpu13 0 -
>>>> cpu14 1 1009
>>>> cpu15 0 -
>>>> cpu16 1 623
>>>> cpu17 1 623
>>>> cpu18 1 623
>>>> cpu19 1 623
>>>> cpu20 0 -
>>>> cpu21 0 -
>>>> cpu22 0 -
>>>> cpu23 0 -
>>>>
>>>> Previously:
>>>> cpu online capacity
>>>> cpu0 1 1009
>>>> cpu1 0 -
>>>> cpu2 1 1009
>>>> cpu3 0 -
>>>> cpu4 1 1009
>>>> cpu5 0 -
>>>> cpu6 1 1009
>>>> cpu7 0 -
>>>> cpu8 1 1024
>>>> cpu9 0 -
>>>> cpu10 1 1024
>>>> cpu11 0 -
>>>> cpu12 1 1009
>>>> cpu13 0 -
>>>> cpu14 1 1009
>>>> cpu15 0 -
>>>> cpu16 1 623
>>>> cpu17 1 623
>>>> cpu18 1 623
>>>> cpu19 1 623
>>>> cpu20 1 623
>>>> cpu21 1 623
>>>> cpu22 1 623
>>>> cpu23 1 623
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Rafael, I don't immediately see how to fix this properly so I won't
>>>> try to, feel free to treat this as a bug report.
>>>
>>> Sure, thanks for reporting this!
>>>
>>> Well, I think that cpuhp_smt_enable() is missing a check. It looks to
>>> me like it should do the topology_is_primary_thread(cpu) check like
>>> cpuhp_smt_disable().
>>>
>>> I'll cut a test patch for this later.
>>
>> Something like the attached one, perhaps. I haven't tested it yet,
>> but I'll do that later.
>
> Works here AFAICS, but my test system is not hybrid.
Yep, on my end as well, thanks!
Tested-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Revert "intel_idle: Rescan "dead" SMT siblings during, initialization"
2025-08-28 21:44 ` Christian Loehle
@ 2025-08-29 17:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2025-08-29 17:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Loehle
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-pm, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Artem Bityutskiy
On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 11:44 PM Christian Loehle
<christian.loehle@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On 8/28/25 20:06, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 6:13 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 4:44 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 4:26 PM Christian Loehle
> >>> <christian.loehle@arm.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> This reverts commit a430c11f401589a0f4f57fd398271a5d85142c7a.
> >>>>
> >>>> Calling arch_cpu_rescan_dead_smt_siblings() in intel_idle_init with
> >>>> boot parameter nosmt and maxcpus active hotplugged boot-offline CPUs
> >>>> in (and leave them online) which weren't supposed to be online.
> >>>>
> >>>> With the revert and nosmt and maxcpus=12 on a raptor lake:
> >>>> cpu online capacity
> >>>> cpu0 1 1009
> >>>> cpu1 0 -
> >>>> cpu2 1 1009
> >>>> cpu3 0 -
> >>>> cpu4 1 1009
> >>>> cpu5 0 -
> >>>> cpu6 1 1009
> >>>> cpu7 0 -
> >>>> cpu8 1 1024
> >>>> cpu9 0 -
> >>>> cpu10 1 1024
> >>>> cpu11 0 -
> >>>> cpu12 1 1009
> >>>> cpu13 0 -
> >>>> cpu14 1 1009
> >>>> cpu15 0 -
> >>>> cpu16 1 623
> >>>> cpu17 1 623
> >>>> cpu18 1 623
> >>>> cpu19 1 623
> >>>> cpu20 0 -
> >>>> cpu21 0 -
> >>>> cpu22 0 -
> >>>> cpu23 0 -
> >>>>
> >>>> Previously:
> >>>> cpu online capacity
> >>>> cpu0 1 1009
> >>>> cpu1 0 -
> >>>> cpu2 1 1009
> >>>> cpu3 0 -
> >>>> cpu4 1 1009
> >>>> cpu5 0 -
> >>>> cpu6 1 1009
> >>>> cpu7 0 -
> >>>> cpu8 1 1024
> >>>> cpu9 0 -
> >>>> cpu10 1 1024
> >>>> cpu11 0 -
> >>>> cpu12 1 1009
> >>>> cpu13 0 -
> >>>> cpu14 1 1009
> >>>> cpu15 0 -
> >>>> cpu16 1 623
> >>>> cpu17 1 623
> >>>> cpu18 1 623
> >>>> cpu19 1 623
> >>>> cpu20 1 623
> >>>> cpu21 1 623
> >>>> cpu22 1 623
> >>>> cpu23 1 623
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> Rafael, I don't immediately see how to fix this properly so I won't
> >>>> try to, feel free to treat this as a bug report.
> >>>
> >>> Sure, thanks for reporting this!
> >>>
> >>> Well, I think that cpuhp_smt_enable() is missing a check. It looks to
> >>> me like it should do the topology_is_primary_thread(cpu) check like
> >>> cpuhp_smt_disable().
> >>>
> >>> I'll cut a test patch for this later.
> >>
> >> Something like the attached one, perhaps. I haven't tested it yet,
> >> but I'll do that later.
> >
> > Works here AFAICS, but my test system is not hybrid.
>
> Yep, on my end as well, thanks!
> Tested-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
Thanks for testing and let me submit a proper patch.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-08-29 17:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-08-28 14:25 [PATCH] Revert "intel_idle: Rescan "dead" SMT siblings during, initialization" Christian Loehle
2025-08-28 14:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-08-28 16:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-08-28 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-08-28 21:44 ` Christian Loehle
2025-08-29 17:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).