From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>,
vkoul@kernel.org, yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com,
sanyog.r.kale@intel.com
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
patches@opensource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] soundwire: bus: Don't re-enumerate before status is UNATTACHED
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 13:00:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <72cd1004-e952-b167-e08d-2b5623b638fd@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220907085259.3602-4-rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
On 9/7/22 10:52, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> Don't re-enumerate a peripheral on #0 until we have seen and
> handled an UNATTACHED notification for that peripheral.
>
> Without this, it is possible for the UNATTACHED status to be missed
> and so the slave->status remains at ATTACHED. If slave->status never
> changes to UNATTACHED the child driver will never be notified of the
> UNATTACH, and the code in sdw_handle_slave_status() will skip the
> second part of enumeration because the slave->status has not changed.
>
> This scenario can happen because PINGs are handled in a workqueue
> function which is working from a snapshot of an old PING, and there
> is no guarantee when this function will run.
>
> A peripheral could report attached in the PING being handled by
> sdw_handle_slave_status(), but has since reverted to device #0 and is
> then found in the loop in sdw_program_device_num(). Previously the
> code would not have updated slave->status to UNATTACHED because it had
> not yet handled a PING where that peripheral had UNATTACHED.
>
> This situation happens fairly frequently with multiple peripherals on
> a bus that are intentionally reset (for example after downloading
> firmware).
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/soundwire/bus.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/bus.c b/drivers/soundwire/bus.c
> index 1cc858b4107d..6e569a875a9b 100644
> --- a/drivers/soundwire/bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/bus.c
> @@ -773,6 +773,16 @@ static int sdw_program_device_num(struct sdw_bus *bus)
> if (sdw_compare_devid(slave, id) == 0) {
> found = true;
>
> + /*
> + * To prevent skipping state-machine stages don't
> + * program a device until we've seen it UNATTACH.
> + * Must return here because no other device on #0
> + * can be detected until this one has been
> + * assigned a device ID.
> + */
> + if (slave->status != SDW_SLAVE_UNATTACHED)
> + return 0;
> +
> /*
> * Assign a new dev_num to this Slave and
> * not mark it present. It will be marked
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-12 12:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-07 8:52 [PATCH v2 0/5] soundwire: Fixes for spurious and missing UNATTACH Richard Fitzgerald
2022-09-07 8:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] soundwire: cadence: fix updating slave status when a bus has multiple peripherals Richard Fitzgerald
2022-09-07 8:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] soundwire: bus: Don't lose unattach notifications Richard Fitzgerald
2022-09-07 8:52 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] soundwire: bus: Don't re-enumerate before status is UNATTACHED Richard Fitzgerald
2022-09-12 11:00 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2022-09-07 8:52 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] soundwire: cadence: Fix lost ATTACHED interrupts when enumerating Richard Fitzgerald
2022-09-12 11:05 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-09-12 12:36 ` Richard Fitzgerald
2022-09-07 8:52 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] soundwire: bus: Don't exit early if no device IDs were programmed Richard Fitzgerald
2022-09-12 11:43 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-09-12 12:25 ` Richard Fitzgerald
2022-09-12 17:09 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-09-13 15:30 ` Richard Fitzgerald
2022-09-13 17:59 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=72cd1004-e952-b167-e08d-2b5623b638fd@linux.intel.com \
--to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=rf@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=sanyog.r.kale@intel.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox