From: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
To: Evgeny Novikov <novikov@ispras.ru>,
irenic.rajneesh@gmail.com, gayatri.kammela@intel.com,
hdegoede@redhat.com, mgross@linux.intel.com,
andy.shevchenko@gmail.com
Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Prevent possibile overflow
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 14:51:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7308291f26a3f225fca069461d9ac26170f0ba66.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <159dec07-9f05-3a92-8b7d-3d2f27448f70@ispras.ru>
Hi Evgeny,
On Wed, 2021-08-04 at 13:48 +0300, Evgeny Novikov wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Your patch fixes the out of bound issue, but I have another concern
> regarding possible incomplete initialization of first 8 elements of
> the
> lpm_priority array that is declared on the stack and is not
> initialized,
> say, with zeroes. Yet again due to some invalid values coming from
> the
> register, it is not guaranteed that something meaningful will be
> assigned for all first 8 elements of lpm_priority in the first cycle
> in
> pmc_core_get_low_power_modes(). In the second cycle this function
> accesses all these elements from lpm_priority. Though there is test
> "!(BIT(mode) & lpm_en)", it can pass accidentally, thus some
> unexpected
> values can be stored to "pmcdev->lpm_en_modes[i++]" and exposed
> later.
I sent out a v2 that validates the priority levels are within bounds
and meaningful before reordering them to set the lpm_en_modes. Thanks.
David
>
>
> Best regards,
> Evgeny Novikov
>
>
> On 04.08.2021 03:30, David E. Box wrote:
> > Low Power Mode (LPM) priority is encoded in 4 bits. Yet, this value
> > is used
> > as an index to an array whose element size was less than 16,
> > leading to the
> > possibility of overflow should we read a larger than expected
> > priority. Set
> > the array size to 16 to prevent this.
> >
> > Reported-by: Evgeny Novikov <novikov@ispras.ru>
> > Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.h | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c
> > b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c
> > index b0e486a6bdfb..2a761fe98277 100644
> > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c
> > @@ -1451,7 +1451,7 @@ DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(pmc_core_pkgc);
> >
> > static void pmc_core_get_low_power_modes(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev)
> > {
> > - u8 lpm_priority[LPM_MAX_NUM_MODES];
> > + u8 lpm_priority[LPM_MAX_PRI];
> > u32 lpm_en;
> > int mode, i, p;
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.h
> > b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.h
> > index e8dae9c6c45f..b98c2b44c938 100644
> > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.h
> > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.h
> > @@ -190,6 +190,7 @@ enum ppfear_regs {
> > #define LPM_MAX_NUM_MODES 8
> > #define GET_X2_COUNTER(v) ((v) >> 1)
> > #define LPM_STS_LATCH_MODE BIT(31)
> > +#define LPM_MAX_PRI 16 /* size of
> > 4 bits */
> >
> > #define TGL_PMC_SLP_S0_RES_COUNTER_STEP 0x7A
> > #define TGL_PMC_LTR_THC0 0x1C04
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-04 21:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-03 18:11 [PATCH] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Fix potential buffer overflows Evgeny Novikov
2021-08-03 18:26 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-08-03 18:30 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-08-04 9:43 ` Evgeny Novikov
2021-08-03 21:49 ` David E. Box
2021-08-04 0:30 ` [PATCH] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Prevent possibile overflow David E. Box
2021-08-04 10:48 ` Evgeny Novikov
2021-08-04 21:51 ` David E. Box [this message]
2021-08-05 16:21 ` Evgeny Novikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7308291f26a3f225fca069461d9ac26170f0ba66.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=gayatri.kammela@intel.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=irenic.rajneesh@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgross@linux.intel.com \
--cc=novikov@ispras.ru \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox