From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Hui Zhu <hui.zhu@linux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>,
Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@google.com>, Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Hui Zhu <zhuhui@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10] mm: fix ASSERT_EXCLUSIVE_BITS by passing memdesc_flags_t by pointer
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2026 10:04:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <73c67890-0048-40ff-9314-81944a8dfdb8@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708021525.627503-1-hui.zhu@linux.dev>
On 7/8/26 04:15, Hui Zhu wrote:
> From: Hui Zhu <zhuhui@kylinos.cn>
>
> KCSAN reports a data race between page_to_nid()/folio_pgdat() reading
> page->flags and folio_trylock()/folio_lock() concurrently doing
> test_and_set_bit_lock(PG_locked, ...) on the same word, e.g.:
>
> BUG: KCSAN: data-race in __lruvec_stat_mod_folio / shmem_get_folio_gfp
>
> The race is benign: nid/zone bits are set once at page init and never
> overlap with PG_locked. However, ASSERT_EXCLUSIVE_BITS() inside
> memdesc_nid/zonenum() was checking a by-value copy of the flags word,
> not the live page->flags, so it failed to annotate the real access.
>
> Change memdesc_nid(), memdesc_zonenum(), memdesc_section(), and
> memdesc_is_zone_device() to take a const memdesc_flags_t * and update
> all callers to pass &page->flags / &folio->flags, so
> ASSERT_EXCLUSIVE_BITS() operates on the actual shared word.
>
> Guard the ASSERT_EXCLUSIVE_BITS() call in memdesc_zonenum() under
> ZONES_WIDTH != 0 to avoid a zero-mask check on configs where the zone
> field is absent. memdesc_section() needs no such guard, since
> SECTIONS_WIDTH is never 0 wherever SECTION_IN_PAGE_FLAGS is defined.
> Under CONFIG_NUMA=n, memdesc_nid() itself is stubbed to "return 0"
> instead of reading page->flags, since NODES_MASK is 0 and the check
> can never fire; page_to_nid()/folio_nid() now just call memdesc_nid()
> unconditionally and rely on that stub, instead of duplicating the
> CONFIG_NUMA split at each call site.
>
> Co-developed-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Hui Zhu <zhuhui@kylinos.cn>
> ---
> Changelog:
> v10:
> According to the comments of David, drop the redundant CONFIG_NUMA split
> in page_to_nid()/folio_nid() and remove the SECTIONS_WIDTH != 0 guard
> around ASSERT_EXCLUSIVE_BITS() in memdesc_section().
> v9:
> Add the SECTIONS_WIDTH check to memdesc_section.
> v8:
> According to the comments of Andrew, include kcsan-checks.h in mm.h.
> Incorporate David's patch that switch memdesc_nid(), memdesc_zonenum(),
> memdesc_section() and memdesc_is_zone_device() to take a const
> memdesc_flags_t * instead of using a per-accessor macro/call-site hack.
> Update all callers accordingly and extend the same exclusive-bits check
> to memdesc_section() and memdesc_is_zone_device(), guarded by
> SECTIONS_WIDTH != 0 / reusing ZONES_WIDTH != 0 to avoid zero-mask checks
> on configs without the corresponding field.
> v7:
> According to the comments of Sashiko, restrict the memdesc_nid() macro
> to CONFIG_NUMA, keeping a plain "return 0" static inline stub otherwise,
> and re-add a local page pointer in page_to_nid() to avoid evaluating
> PF_POISONED_CHECK(page) twice.
> v6:
> According to the comments of David, turn memdesc_nid() from a static
> inline function into a macro so ASSERT_EXCLUSIVE_BITS() can check the
> caller's page->flags/folio->flags directly.
> v5:
> According to the comments of Sashiko, guard the ASSERT_EXCLUSIVE_BITS()
> calls with #ifndef NODE_NOT_IN_PAGE_FLAGS (for nid) and #if
> ZONES_WIDTH != 0 (for zonenum).
> According to the comments of David, avoid calling
> PF_POISONED_CHECK(page) twice in page_to_nid().
> According to the warning of lkp, switch the CONFIG_NUMA=n
> page_to_nid()/folio_nid() stubs from macros to static inline functions.
> v4:
> According to the comments of Andrew and Sashiko, set
> page_to_nid()/folio_nid() as static inline stubs returning 0
> under CONFIG_NUMA=n.
> v3:
> According to the comments of Andrew and Sashiko, move
> ASSERT_EXCLUSIVE_BITS out of memdesc_nid()/memdesc_zonenum()
> into the page/folio call sites.
> v2:
> According to the comments of David, remove useless comments and use
> ASSERT_EXCLUSIVE_BITS() in memdesc_nid() instead of data_race() in
> page_to_nid().
>
> include/asm-generic/memory_model.h | 2 +-
> include/linux/mm.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
> include/linux/mm_inline.h | 4 ++--
> include/linux/mmzone.h | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
> mm/page_alloc.c | 6 +++---
> mm/slab.h | 2 +-
> mm/sparse.c | 2 +-
> 7 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/memory_model.h b/include/asm-generic/memory_model.h
> index fd74de50b054..c6b4eafaf4cb 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/memory_model.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/memory_model.h
> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ static inline int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn)
> */
> #define __page_to_pfn(pg) \
> ({ const struct page *__pg = (pg); \
> - int __sec = memdesc_section(__pg->flags); \
> + int __sec = memdesc_section(&__pg->flags); \
> (unsigned long)(__pg - __section_mem_map_addr(__nr_to_section(__sec))); \
> })
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 2101e5205fc0..01683d50b3cd 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
> #include <linux/bitmap.h>
> #include <linux/bitops.h>
> #include <linux/iommu-debug-pagealloc.h>
> +#include <linux/kcsan-checks.h>
>
> struct mempolicy;
> struct anon_vma;
> @@ -2286,22 +2287,32 @@ static inline int page_zone_id(struct page *page)
> }
>
> #ifdef NODE_NOT_IN_PAGE_FLAGS
> -int memdesc_nid(memdesc_flags_t mdf);
> +int memdesc_nid(const memdesc_flags_t *mdf);
> #else
> -static inline int memdesc_nid(memdesc_flags_t mdf)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> +static inline int memdesc_nid(const memdesc_flags_t *mdf)
> {
> - return (mdf.f >> NODES_PGSHIFT) & NODES_MASK;
> + ASSERT_EXCLUSIVE_BITS(mdf->f, NODES_MASK << NODES_PGSHIFT);
> + return (mdf->f >> NODES_PGSHIFT) & NODES_MASK;
> }
> +#else
> +static inline int memdesc_nid(const memdesc_flags_t *mdf)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> #endif
>
> static inline int page_to_nid(const struct page *page)
> {
> - return memdesc_nid(PF_POISONED_CHECK(page)->flags);
> + const struct page *p = PF_POISONED_CHECK(page);
> +
> + return memdesc_nid(&p->flags);
> }
Nit: Why not keep it as
return memdesc_nid(&(PF_POISONED_CHECK(page)->flags));
Apart from that
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
--
Cheers,
David
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-08 8:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-08 2:15 [PATCH v10] mm: fix ASSERT_EXCLUSIVE_BITS by passing memdesc_flags_t by pointer Hui Zhu
2026-07-08 8:04 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=73c67890-0048-40ff-9314-81944a8dfdb8@kernel.org \
--to=david@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=hui.zhu@linux.dev \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
--cc=zhuhui@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox