From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>, Yu Kuai <hailan@yukuai.org.cn>,
axboe@kernel.dk, tj@kernel.org, josef@toxicpanda.com,
song@kernel.org, neil@brown.name, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
hch@infradead.org, colyli@kernel.org, hare@suse.de,
tieren@fnnas.com
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com,
johnny.chenyi@huawei.com, "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 09/10] block: fix disordered IO in the case recursive split
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 15:51:23 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <73ce25dd-ce6e-4482-8537-b4f2166bbc47@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5417dfdd-f558-2d5e-43b1-043c6bd30041@huaweicloud.com>
On 9/1/25 11:40 AM, Yu Kuai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 在 2025/08/30 12:28, Yu Kuai 写道:
>>>> @@ -745,12 +745,16 @@ void submit_bio_noacct_nocheck(struct bio *bio)
>>>> * to collect a list of requests submited by a ->submit_bio method while
>>>> * it is active, and then process them after it returned.
>>>> */
>>>> - if (current->bio_list)
>>>> - bio_list_add(¤t->bio_list[0], bio);
>>>> - else if (!bdev_test_flag(bio->bi_bdev, BD_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO))
>>>> + if (current->bio_list) {
>>>> + if (split)
>>>> + bio_list_add_head(¤t->bio_list[0], bio);
>>>> + else
>>>> + bio_list_add(¤t->bio_list[0], bio);
>>> This really needs a comment clarifying why we do an add at tail instead of
>>> keeping the original order with a add at head. I am also scared that this may
>>> break sequential write ordering for zoned devices.
>>
>> I think add at head is exactly what we do here to keep the orginal order for
>> the case bio split. Other than split, if caller do generate multiple sequential
>> bios, we should keep the order by add at tail.
>>
>> Not sure about zoned devices for now, I'll have a look in details.
>
> For zoned devices, can we somehow trigger this recursive split? I
> suspect bio disordered will apear in this case but I don't know for
> now and I can't find a way to reporduce it.
dm-linear can be stacked on e.g. dm-crypt, or the reverse. So recursive
splitting may be possible. Though since for DM everything is zone aligned, it
may be hard to find a reproducer. Though dm-crypt will always split BIOs to
BIO_MAX_VECS << PAGE_SECTORS_SHIFT sectors, so it may be possible with very
large BIOs. Would need to try, but really overloaded with other things right now.
>
> Perhaps I can bypass zoned devices for now, and if we really met the
> recursive split case and there is a problem, we can fix it later:
>
> if (split && !bdev_is_zoned(bio->bi_bdev))
> bio_list_add_head()
>
> Thanks,
> Kuai
>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-01 6:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-28 6:57 [PATCH RFC v2 00/10] block: fix disordered IO in the case recursive split Yu Kuai
2025-08-28 6:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 01/10] block: factor out a helper bio_submit_split_bioset() Yu Kuai
2025-08-30 0:37 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-30 4:03 ` Yu Kuai
2025-08-28 6:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 02/10] md/raid0: convert raid0_handle_discard() to use bio_submit_split_bioset() Yu Kuai
2025-08-30 0:41 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-30 4:10 ` Yu Kuai
2025-08-30 4:38 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-28 6:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 03/10] md/raid1: convert " Yu Kuai
2025-08-30 0:43 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-28 6:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 04/10] md/raid10: convert read/write " Yu Kuai
2025-08-30 0:48 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-30 4:18 ` Yu Kuai
2025-08-28 6:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 05/10] md/raid5: convert " Yu Kuai
2025-08-30 0:50 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-28 6:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 06/10] md/md-linear: " Yu Kuai
2025-08-30 0:51 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-28 6:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 07/10] blk-crypto: " Yu Kuai
2025-08-30 0:55 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-28 6:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 08/10] block: skip unnecessary checks for split bio Yu Kuai
2025-08-30 0:58 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-30 4:22 ` Yu Kuai
2025-08-28 6:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 09/10] block: fix disordered IO in the case recursive split Yu Kuai
2025-08-30 1:02 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-30 4:28 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 2:40 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-01 6:51 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2025-08-28 6:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 10/10] md/raid0: convert raid0_make_request() to use bio_submit_split_bioset() Yu Kuai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=73ce25dd-ce6e-4482-8537-b4f2166bbc47@kernel.org \
--to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=colyli@kernel.org \
--cc=hailan@yukuai.org.cn \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=johnny.chenyi@huawei.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neil@brown.name \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tieren@fnnas.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).