From: Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>, Nambong Ha <over3025@gmail.com>,
Wookje Kwon <aweee0@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] perf config: Add support for writing configs to a config file
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 02:00:38 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <745d8c99-18ed-0ee8-a327-1ff896b5a344@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161114160442.GD26543@kernel.org>
Thank you for your review.
I have a question at the very bottom
(skip v2 I sent lately or not ?).
On 11/15/2016 01:04 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 03:44:20PM +0900, Taeung Song escreveu:
>> Add setting feature that can add config variables with their values
>> to a config file (i.e. user or system config file) or modify
>> config key-value pairs in a config file.
>> For the syntax examples,
>>
>> perf config [<file-option>] [section.name[=value] ...]
>>
>> e.g. You can set the ui.show-headers to false with
>>
>> # perf config ui.show-headers=false
>>
>> If you want to add or modify several config items, you can do like
>>
>> # perf config annotate.show_nr_jumps=false kmem.default=slab
>
> This works, but has some problems, see below:
>
>> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> tools/perf/builtin-config.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>> tools/perf/util/config.c | 6 +++++
>> tools/perf/util/config.h | 2 ++
>> 3 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-config.c b/tools/perf/builtin-config.c
>> index fe253f3..5313702 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-config.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-config.c
>> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
>> static bool use_system_config, use_user_config;
>>
>> static const char * const config_usage[] = {
>> - "perf config [<file-option>] [options] [section.name ...]",
>> + "perf config [<file-option>] [options] [section.name[=value] ...]",
>> NULL
>> };
>>
>> @@ -33,6 +33,37 @@ static struct option config_options[] = {
>> OPT_END()
>> };
>>
>> +static int set_config(struct perf_config_set *set, const char *file_name,
>> + const char *var, const char *value)
>> +{
>> + struct perf_config_section *section = NULL;
>> + struct perf_config_item *item = NULL;
>> + const char *first_line = "# this file is auto-generated.";
>> + FILE *fp = fopen(file_name, "w");
>> +
>> + if (!fp)
>> + return -1;
>> + if (set == NULL)
>> + return -1;
>
> So, here fp is left open? I'm fixing this...
Understood. Sorry, I missed out it.
>> + perf_config_set__collect(set, var, value);
>> + fprintf(fp, "%s\n", first_line);
>> +
>> + /* overwrite configvariables */
> missing space?
Oops.. I missed a white space between two words.
>> + perf_config_items__for_each_entry(&set->sections, section) {
>> + fprintf(fp, "[%s]\n", section->name);
>> +
>> + perf_config_items__for_each_entry(§ion->items, item) {
>> + if (item->value)
>> + fprintf(fp, "\t%s = %s\n",
>> + item->name, item->value);
>> + }
>> + }
>> + fclose(fp);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int show_spec_config(struct perf_config_set *set, const char *var)
>> {
>> struct perf_config_section *section;
>> @@ -82,7 +113,7 @@ static int show_config(struct perf_config_set *set)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static int parse_config_arg(char *arg, char **var)
>> +static int parse_config_arg(char *arg, char **var, char **value)
>> {
>> const char *last_dot = strchr(arg, '.');
>>
>> @@ -99,7 +130,21 @@ static int parse_config_arg(char *arg, char **var)
>> return -1;
>> }
>>
>> - *var = arg;
>> + *value = strchr(arg, '=');
>> + if (*value == NULL)
>> + *var = arg;
>> + else if (!strcmp(*value, "=")) {
>> + pr_err("The config variable does not contain a value: %s\n", arg);
>> + return -1;
>> + } else {
>> + *value = *value + 1; /* excluding a first character '=' */
>> + *var = strsep(&arg, "=");
>> + if (*var[0] == '\0') {
>> + pr_err("invalid config variable: %s\n", arg);
>> + return -1;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
Here and..
>>
>> @@ -153,7 +198,8 @@ int cmd_config(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __maybe_unused)
>> default:
>> if (argc) {
>> for (i = 0; argv[i]; i++) {
>> - char *var, *arg = strdup(argv[i]);
>> + char *var, *value;
>> + char *arg = strdup(argv[i]);
>>
>> if (!arg) {
>> pr_err("%s: strdup failed\n", __func__);
>> @@ -161,13 +207,21 @@ int cmd_config(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __maybe_unused)
>> break;
>> }
>>
>> - if (parse_config_arg(arg, &var) < 0) {
>> + if (parse_config_arg(arg, &var, &value) < 0) {
>> free(arg);
>> ret = -1;
>> break;
>> }
>>
>> - ret = show_spec_config(set, var);
>> + if (value == NULL)
>> + ret = show_spec_config(set, var);
>> + else {
>> + const char *config_filename = config_exclusive_filename;
>> +
>> + if (!config_exclusive_filename)
>> + config_filename = user_config;
>> + ret = set_config(set, config_filename, var, value);
>> + }
>> free(arg);
Here, the parts are a bit different than v2 patchset I sent lately.
I refactored parse_config_arg() and a bit modify parsing
config arguments in cmd_config().
Is it better to just skip v2 patchset I sent ?
And remake new patchset regarding today your feedback ?
Or would I make v3 that adopts v2 I sent?
Thanks,
Taeung
>> }
>> } else
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/config.c b/tools/perf/util/config.c
>> index 18dae74..c8fb65d 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/config.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/config.c
>> @@ -602,6 +602,12 @@ static int collect_config(const char *var, const char *value,
>> return -1;
>> }
>>
>> +int perf_config_set__collect(struct perf_config_set *set,
>> + const char *var, const char *value)
>> +{
>> + return collect_config(var, value, set);
>> +}
>> +
>> static int perf_config_set__init(struct perf_config_set *set)
>> {
>> int ret = -1;
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/config.h b/tools/perf/util/config.h
>> index 6f813d4..0fcdb8c 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/config.h
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/config.h
>> @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ const char *perf_etc_perfconfig(void);
>>
>> struct perf_config_set *perf_config_set__new(void);
>> void perf_config_set__delete(struct perf_config_set *set);
>> +int perf_config_set__collect(struct perf_config_set *set,
>> + const char *var, const char *value);
>> void perf_config__init(void);
>> void perf_config__exit(void);
>> void perf_config__refresh(void);
>> --
>> 2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-14 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-04 6:44 [PATCH 0/6] perf config: Add support for setting and getting functionalities Taeung Song
2016-11-04 6:44 ` [PATCH 1/6] perf config: Add support for getting config key-value pairs Taeung Song
2016-11-14 15:50 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-11-14 16:21 ` Taeung Song
2016-11-28 9:02 ` Taeung Song
2016-11-15 10:44 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Taeung Song
2016-11-04 6:44 ` [PATCH 2/6] perf config: Document examples to get config key-value pairs in man page Taeung Song
2016-11-14 15:51 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-11-14 16:30 ` Taeung Song
2016-11-04 6:44 ` [PATCH 3/6] perf config: Parse config variable arguments before getting functionality Taeung Song
2016-11-15 10:44 ` [tip:perf/core] perf config: Validate config variable arguments before trying use them tip-bot for Taeung Song
2016-11-04 6:44 ` [PATCH 4/6] perf config: Add support for writing configs to a config file Taeung Song
2016-11-14 16:04 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-11-14 17:00 ` Taeung Song [this message]
2016-11-15 1:49 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-11-15 2:28 ` Taeung Song
2016-11-15 10:45 ` [tip:perf/core] perf config: Add support setting variables in " tip-bot for Taeung Song
2016-11-04 6:44 ` [PATCH 5/6] perf config: Document examples to set config variables with values in man page Taeung Song
2016-11-04 6:44 ` [PATCH 6/6] perf config: Mark where are config items from (user or system) Taeung Song
2016-11-15 10:46 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Taeung Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=745d8c99-18ed-0ee8-a327-1ff896b5a344@gmail.com \
--to=treeze.taeung@gmail.com \
--cc=arnaldo.melo@gmail.com \
--cc=aweee0@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=over3025@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).