From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: "Michael Kelley (LINUX)" <mikelley@microsoft.com>,
Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Hang loading initrd since last Friday.
Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 16:46:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <745e1e38-85ed-76dc-9cbb-2c3d71d70d97@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR21MB168889708435D073352C4A46D76D9@BYAPR21MB1688.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
On 5/4/23 10:59, Michael Kelley (LINUX) wrote:
> From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> Sent: Thursday, May 4, 2023 10:23 AM
>>
>> On 5/3/23 16:49, Ben Greear wrote:
>>> On 5/2/23 21:46, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
>>>> On 03.05.23 04:31, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 02:03:33PM -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Pulling today's upstream 6.3+ tree, my system now hangs loading initrd.
>>>>
>>>> Just to understand this properly: you mean after the boot loader said it
>>>> loaded the initramfs, not when the kernel starts using it?
>>>
>>> I am bisecting...it appears to be .config related. If I skip enabling things
>>> during bisect, then I do not see the problem. But I copied my original buggy .config
>>> into an otherwise good kernel commit, and now it fails. I'm manually bisecting
>>> the .config settings....
>>
>> I had enabled this option: CONFIG_HYPERV_VTL_MODE
>>
>> And that makes it not boot. Not sure that is expected or not, but
>> I will simply un-select it and continue on, as I do not actually need that feature.
>>
>
> What you observed is expected when CONFIG_HYPERV_VTL_MODE is selected,
> which is why it defaults to N. The comment for that option in the Kconfig file says:
>
> Select this option to build a Linux kernel to run at a VTL other than
> the normal VTL0, which currently is only VTL2. This option
> initializes the x86 platform for VTL2, and adds the ability to boot
> secondary CPUs directly into 64-bit context as required for VTLs other
> than 0. A kernel built with this option must run at VTL2, and will
> not run as a normal guest.
I didn't read it close enough, but that is my fault.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-04 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-02 21:03 Hang loading initrd since last Friday Ben Greear
2023-05-03 2:31 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-05-03 4:46 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2023-05-03 23:49 ` Ben Greear
2023-05-04 16:38 ` Raghavendra K T
2023-05-04 16:44 ` Jens Axboe
2023-05-04 18:48 ` Raghavendra K T
2023-05-04 18:49 ` Jens Axboe
2023-05-04 17:22 ` Ben Greear
2023-05-04 17:59 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
2023-05-04 23:46 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2023-05-05 0:04 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=745e1e38-85ed-76dc-9cbb-2c3d71d70d97@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikelley@microsoft.com \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox