From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Patrick Farrell <paf@cray.com>,
Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>,
"devel@driverdev.osuosl.org" <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org" <lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org>
Subject: Re: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 08/28] staging: lustre: restore initialization of return code
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 01:00:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7466839.omZLGPO0np@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFyfayS7zQwUv9VR2hFMSE25Fc4vje9y4Dyuzop-ic2YAw@mail.gmail.com>
On Monday, October 17, 2016 3:37:11 PM CEST Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> >
> > Sorry, I pasted the wrong error message when writing the changelog.
>
> Not just the warning, the summary above it talks about the wrong
> function too. And the commit it references doesn't actually exist
> either. So apparently this is against something else than my tree.
Right, it slipped in here together with the other lustre patch when
I rebased my longer series (based on linux-next) onto v4.9-rc1.
Both applied cleanly to v4.9-rc1 and they are required on linux-next
(not the version with the wrong changelog of course) but have no
effect in mainline so far.
I'll double-check the rest of the series tomorrow, to see if some
of the other patches also have the same problem and are only
needed on linux-next. I meant to send those as part of the
separate series for v4.10.
For now, it would be good to know if you see any remaining warnings
on your machine after applying the current series (with or without
the lustre patches, doesn't matter) to a test branch. Some other
patches in the series likely need to go through a second revision
anyway.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-17 23:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-17 22:03 [PATCH 00/28] Reenable maybe-uninitialized warnings Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 22:05 ` [PATCH 01/28] [v2] netfilter: nf_tables: avoid uninitialized variable warning Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-18 15:23 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-10-17 22:05 ` [PATCH 02/28] [v2] mtd: mtk: avoid warning in mtk_ecc_encode Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-18 5:19 ` Boris Brezillon
[not found] ` <1476785552.24626.4.camel@mtkswgap22>
2016-10-18 19:45 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-17 22:05 ` [PATCH 03/28] [v2] infiniband: shut up a maybe-uninitialized warning Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-18 6:47 ` Haggai Eran
2016-10-18 10:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-18 10:32 ` Haggai Eran
2016-10-17 22:05 ` [PATCH 04/28] f2fs: replace a build-time warning with runtime WARN_ON Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-26 14:05 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2016-10-26 14:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-27 11:41 ` Chao Yu
2016-10-17 22:05 ` [PATCH 05/28] ext2: avoid bogus -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-18 5:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-18 9:30 ` Jan Kara
2016-10-17 22:05 ` [PATCH 06/28] NFSv4.1: work around " Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 22:08 ` [PATCH 07/28] ceph: avoid false positive maybe-uninitialized warning Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-18 2:07 ` Yan, Zheng
2016-10-17 22:08 ` [PATCH 08/28] staging: lustre: restore initialization of return code Arnd Bergmann
[not found] ` <CY4PR11MB1751050A7C7AF840E94DDE60CBD00@CY4PR11MB1751.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2016-10-17 22:29 ` [lustre-devel] " Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 22:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-10-17 23:00 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2016-10-17 22:42 ` [PATCH 08/28 v2] " Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 22:08 ` [PATCH 09/28] staging: lustre: remove broken dead code in cfs_cpt_table_create_pattern Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 22:10 ` [PATCH 10/28] UBI: fix uninitialized access of vid_hdr pointer Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-18 5:17 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-17 22:10 ` [PATCH 11/28] block: rdb: false-postive gcc-4.9 -Wmaybe-uninitialized Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-18 9:57 ` Ilya Dryomov
2016-10-18 10:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 22:12 ` [PATCH 12/28] [media] rc: print correct variable for z8f0811 Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 22:13 ` [PATCH 13/28] [media] dib0700: fix uninitialized data on 'repeat' event Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 22:13 ` [PATCH 14/28] iio: accel: sca3000_core: avoid potentially uninitialized variable Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-23 21:25 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-10-17 22:13 ` [PATCH 15/28] crypto: aesni: avoid -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 22:13 ` [PATCH 16/28] pcmcia: fix return value of soc_pcmcia_regulator_set Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-18 9:42 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-10-17 22:13 ` [PATCH 17/28] spi: fsl-espi: avoid processing uninitalized data on error Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-24 17:27 ` Mark Brown
2016-10-24 18:36 ` Heiner Kallweit
2016-10-24 18:45 ` Mark Brown
2016-10-24 20:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-25 19:13 ` Mark Brown
2016-10-25 20:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-26 10:15 ` Applied "spi: fsl-espi: avoid processing uninitalized data on error" to the spi tree Mark Brown
2016-10-26 18:11 ` Merge problem: " Heiner Kallweit
2016-10-26 21:59 ` Mark Brown
2016-10-17 22:13 ` [PATCH 18/28] drm: avoid uninitialized timestamp use in wait_vblank Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 23:47 ` Mario Kleiner
2016-10-18 7:46 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-10-17 22:13 ` [PATCH 19/28] brcmfmac: avoid maybe-uninitialized warning in brcmf_cfg80211_start_ap Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-26 6:49 ` Kalle Valo
2016-10-26 9:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-26 11:11 ` Kalle Valo
2016-10-27 15:05 ` [19/28] " Kalle Valo
2016-10-17 22:16 ` [PATCH 20/28] net: bcm63xx: avoid referencing uninitialized variable Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-18 18:21 ` David Miller
2016-10-17 22:16 ` [PATCH 21/28] net/hyperv: avoid " Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-18 18:21 ` David Miller
2016-10-17 22:16 ` [PATCH 22/28] x86: apm: avoid uninitialized data Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-18 13:05 ` Jiri Kosina
2016-10-18 21:35 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-10-17 22:16 ` [PATCH 23/28] x86: mark target address as output in 'insb' asm Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 22:16 ` [PATCH 24/28] x86: math-emu: possible uninitialized variable use Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-17 22:16 ` [PATCH 25/28] s390: pci: don't print uninitialized data for debugging Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-18 6:48 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2016-10-18 8:53 ` Sebastian Ott
2016-10-17 22:16 ` [PATCH 26/28] nios2: fix timer initcall return value Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-24 0:54 ` Ley Foon Tan
2016-10-17 22:16 ` [PATCH 27/28] rocker: fix maybe-uninitialized warning Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-18 18:21 ` David Miller
2016-10-17 22:19 ` [PATCH 28/28] Kbuild: bring back -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-18 5:08 ` [PATCH 00/28] Reenable maybe-uninitialized warnings Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7466839.omZLGPO0np@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
--cc=oleg.drokin@intel.com \
--cc=paf@cray.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox