From: Antonino Maniscalco <antomani103@gmail.com>
To: Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@quicinc.com>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>, Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/10] drm/msm/A6xx: Add traces for preemption
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 17:08:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <74e8bca6-dc4a-41fb-b7a3-1281ea89ae97@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240906201101.vccq54s4nmlmgeoz@hu-akhilpo-hyd.qualcomm.com>
On 9/6/24 10:11 PM, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 04:51:25PM +0200, Antonino Maniscalco wrote:
>> Add trace points corresponding to preemption being triggered and being
>> completed for latency measurement purposes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Antonino Maniscalco <antomani103@gmail.com>
>> Tested-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> # on SM8650-QRD
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_preempt.c | 7 +++++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_trace.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_preempt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_preempt.c
>> index ec44f44d925f..ca9d36c107f2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_preempt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_preempt.c
>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>> #include "a6xx_gpu.h"
>> #include "a6xx_gmu.xml.h"
>> #include "msm_mmu.h"
>> +#include "msm_gpu_trace.h"
>>
>> /*
>> * Try to transition the preemption state from old to new. Return
>> @@ -143,6 +144,8 @@ void a6xx_preempt_irq(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>
>> set_preempt_state(a6xx_gpu, PREEMPT_NONE);
>>
>> + trace_msm_gpu_preemption_irq(a6xx_gpu->cur_ring->id);
>> +
>> /*
>> * Retrigger preemption to avoid a deadlock that might occur when preemption
>> * is skipped due to it being already in flight when requested.
>> @@ -264,6 +267,10 @@ void a6xx_preempt_trigger(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>> */
>> ring->skip_inline_wptr = false;
>>
>> + trace_msm_gpu_preemption_trigger(
>> + a6xx_gpu->cur_ring ? a6xx_gpu->cur_ring->id : -1,
>
> Can't we avoid this check?
>
Sorry yeah you had requested this change but I had forgotten to do it.
> -Akhil.
>
>> + ring ? ring->id : -1);
>> +
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ring->preempt_lock, flags);
>>
>> gpu_write64(gpu,
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_trace.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_trace.h
>> index ac40d857bc45..7f863282db0d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_trace.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_trace.h
>> @@ -177,6 +177,34 @@ TRACE_EVENT(msm_gpu_resume,
>> TP_printk("%u", __entry->dummy)
>> );
>>
>> +TRACE_EVENT(msm_gpu_preemption_trigger,
>> + TP_PROTO(int ring_id_from, int ring_id_to),
>> + TP_ARGS(ring_id_from, ring_id_to),
>> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
>> + __field(int, ring_id_from)
>> + __field(int, ring_id_to)
>> + ),
>> + TP_fast_assign(
>> + __entry->ring_id_from = ring_id_from;
>> + __entry->ring_id_to = ring_id_to;
>> + ),
>> + TP_printk("preempting %u -> %u",
>> + __entry->ring_id_from,
>> + __entry->ring_id_to)
>> +);
>> +
>> +TRACE_EVENT(msm_gpu_preemption_irq,
>> + TP_PROTO(u32 ring_id),
>> + TP_ARGS(ring_id),
>> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
>> + __field(u32, ring_id)
>> + ),
>> + TP_fast_assign(
>> + __entry->ring_id = ring_id;
>> + ),
>> + TP_printk("preempted to %u", __entry->ring_id)
>> +);
>> +
>> #endif
>>
>> #undef TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH
>>
>> --
>> 2.46.0
>>
Best regards,
--
Antonino Maniscalco <antomani103@gmail.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-09 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-05 14:51 [PATCH v3 00/10] Preemption support for A7XX Antonino Maniscalco
2024-09-05 14:51 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] drm/msm: Fix bv_fence being used as bv_rptr Antonino Maniscalco
2024-09-05 14:51 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] drm/msm: Add a `preempt_record_size` field Antonino Maniscalco
2024-09-05 14:51 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] drm/msm: Add CONTEXT_SWITCH_CNTL bitfields Antonino Maniscalco
2024-09-05 14:51 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] drm/msm/A6xx: Implement preemption for A7XX targets Antonino Maniscalco
2024-09-06 19:54 ` Akhil P Oommen
2024-09-09 12:22 ` Connor Abbott
2024-09-10 16:43 ` Akhil P Oommen
2024-09-12 15:48 ` Antonino Maniscalco
2024-09-16 17:40 ` Akhil P Oommen
2024-09-09 13:15 ` Antonino Maniscalco
2024-09-09 13:42 ` Connor Abbott
2024-09-09 14:40 ` Rob Clark
2024-09-10 16:49 ` Akhil P Oommen
2024-09-09 17:24 ` Antonino Maniscalco
2024-09-05 14:51 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] drm/msm/A6xx: Sync relevant adreno_pm4.xml changes Antonino Maniscalco
2024-09-05 14:51 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] drm/msm/A6xx: Use posamble to reset counters on preemption Antonino Maniscalco
2024-09-06 20:08 ` Akhil P Oommen
2024-09-09 15:07 ` Antonino Maniscalco
2024-09-10 21:34 ` Akhil P Oommen
2024-09-10 22:35 ` Antonino Maniscalco
2024-09-12 7:12 ` Akhil P Oommen
2024-09-12 11:15 ` Antonino Maniscalco
2024-09-05 14:51 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] drm/msm/A6xx: Add traces for preemption Antonino Maniscalco
2024-09-06 20:11 ` Akhil P Oommen
2024-09-09 15:08 ` Antonino Maniscalco [this message]
2024-09-05 14:51 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] drm/msm/A6XX: Add a flag to allow preemption to submitqueue_create Antonino Maniscalco
2024-09-05 14:51 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] drm/msm/A6xx: Enable preemption for A750 Antonino Maniscalco
2024-09-05 14:51 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] Documentation: document adreno preemption Antonino Maniscalco
2024-09-06 19:58 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] Preemption support for A7XX Akhil P Oommen
2024-09-09 15:36 ` Rob Clark
2024-09-12 13:49 ` Antonino Maniscalco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=74e8bca6-dc4a-41fb-b7a3-1281ea89ae97@gmail.com \
--to=antomani103@gmail.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=marijn.suijten@somainline.org \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_akhilpo@quicinc.com \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=sean@poorly.run \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox