From: Skywind <gnuwind@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is kernel 2.6.11 adjust tcp_max_syn_backlog incorrectly?
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:45:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <75052be70506061745478abdf5@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Any one know the reason?
I think the subject may change to
"Is kernel 2.6.11 havn't set /proc network variable"
or
"Kernel 2.6.11 havn't set /proc network variable correctly by mem size"
> Is kernel 2.6.11 adjust tcp_max_syn_backlog incorrectly?
>
> Test Backgroud:
> CPU: Intel P4
> Mem: 512Mb
> The /etc/sysctl.conf and other haven't touch anything.
>
> I found a strange question: when I use kernel 2.6.11, the value of
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_max_syn_backlog is 256,
> while kernel 2.6.10 on same computer the value is 1024.
>
> So I check the net/ipv4/[tcp.c, tcp_ipv4.c] and know when Mem >= 256Mb
> the tcp_max_syn_backlog will be set to 1024,
> but it is 256 in my test above.
> Some other variables that should be adjust all together with
> tcp_max_syn_backlog are:
> ip_local_port_range
> tcp_max_tw_buckets
> tcp_max_orphans
> But they don't be adjust to correctly value(refer to net/ipv4/tcp.c) all.
>
> It seems that kernel don't adjust these value automatic, is this a bug?
>
> I guess the mechanism of tcp.c in 2.6.11 have some changes(between
> 2.6.10), and it conduce to this result,
> Is this guess correctly?
> Xu Gang (Skywind)
> 2005/06/06
next reply other threads:[~2005-06-07 0:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-07 0:45 Skywind [this message]
[not found] <75052be7050606070691c302d@mail.gmail.com>
2005-06-06 14:10 ` Is kernel 2.6.11 adjust tcp_max_syn_backlog incorrectly? Skywind
2005-06-11 10:25 ` Andi Kleen
2005-06-13 21:24 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=75052be70506061745478abdf5@mail.gmail.com \
--to=gnuwind@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox