* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/85] 6.1.94-rc1 review
2024-06-13 11:34 [PATCH 6.1 00/85] 6.1.94-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2024-06-13 16:49 ` SeongJae Park
2024-06-13 17:43 ` Guenter Roeck
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: SeongJae Park @ 2024-06-13 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: SeongJae Park, stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm,
linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie, damon
Hello,
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 13:34:58 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.94 release.
> There are 85 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 15 Jun 2024 11:31:50 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.94-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
This rc kernel passes DAMON functionality test[1] on my test machine.
Attaching the test results summary below. Please note that I retrieved the
kernel from linux-stable-rc tree[2].
Tested-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
[1] https://github.com/awslabs/damon-tests/tree/next/corr
[2] 8d5f06d0f4bb ("Linux 6.1.94-rc1")
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
---
ok 1 selftests: damon: debugfs_attrs.sh
ok 2 selftests: damon: debugfs_schemes.sh
ok 3 selftests: damon: debugfs_target_ids.sh
ok 4 selftests: damon: debugfs_empty_targets.sh
ok 5 selftests: damon: debugfs_huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 6 selftests: damon: debugfs_duplicate_context_creation.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon: sysfs.sh
ok 1 selftests: damon-tests: kunit.sh
ok 2 selftests: damon-tests: huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 3 selftests: damon-tests: buffer_overflow.sh
ok 4 selftests: damon-tests: rm_contexts.sh
ok 5 selftests: damon-tests: record_null_deref.sh
ok 6 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_read_before_terminate_race.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_pid_leak.sh
ok 8 selftests: damon-tests: damo_tests.sh
ok 9 selftests: damon-tests: masim-record.sh
ok 10 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386.sh
ok 11 selftests: damon-tests: build_arm64.sh
ok 12 selftests: damon-tests: build_m68k.sh
ok 13 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_idle_flag.sh
ok 14 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_highpte.sh
ok 15 selftests: damon-tests: build_nomemcg.sh
[33m
[92mPASS [39m
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/85] 6.1.94-rc1 review
2024-06-13 11:34 [PATCH 6.1 00/85] 6.1.94-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-06-13 16:49 ` SeongJae Park
@ 2024-06-13 17:43 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-06-15 11:09 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-06-14 9:35 ` Pavel Machek
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2024-06-13 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On 6/13/24 04:34, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.94 release.
> There are 85 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 15 Jun 2024 11:31:50 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Introduced in 6.1.93:
Building csky:allmodconfig ... failed
Building m68k:allmodconfig ... failed
Building xtensa:allmodconfig ... failed
--------------
Error log:
In file included from kernel/sched/build_utility.c:105:
kernel/sched/isolation.c: In function 'housekeeping_setup':
kernel/sched/isolation.c:134:53: error: 'setup_max_cpus' undeclared
The same problem also affects v6.6.y, starting with v6.6.33.
Commit 3c2f8859ae1c ("smp: Provide 'setup_max_cpus' definition on UP too")
fixes the (build) problem in both branches.
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/85] 6.1.94-rc1 review
2024-06-13 17:43 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2024-06-15 11:09 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2024-06-15 11:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guenter Roeck
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 10:43:37AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 6/13/24 04:34, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.94 release.
> > There are 85 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sat, 15 Jun 2024 11:31:50 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
>
> Introduced in 6.1.93:
>
> Building csky:allmodconfig ... failed
> Building m68k:allmodconfig ... failed
> Building xtensa:allmodconfig ... failed
> --------------
> Error log:
> In file included from kernel/sched/build_utility.c:105:
> kernel/sched/isolation.c: In function 'housekeeping_setup':
> kernel/sched/isolation.c:134:53: error: 'setup_max_cpus' undeclared
>
> The same problem also affects v6.6.y, starting with v6.6.33.
>
> Commit 3c2f8859ae1c ("smp: Provide 'setup_max_cpus' definition on UP too")
> fixes the (build) problem in both branches.
Now queued up for 6.6.y and 6.1.y, thanks.
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/85] 6.1.94-rc1 review
2024-06-13 11:34 [PATCH 6.1 00/85] 6.1.94-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-06-13 16:49 ` SeongJae Park
2024-06-13 17:43 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2024-06-14 9:35 ` Pavel Machek
2024-06-14 10:17 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2024-06-14 9:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 658 bytes --]
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.94 release.
> There are 85 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-6.1.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/85] 6.1.94-rc1 review
2024-06-13 11:34 [PATCH 6.1 00/85] 6.1.94-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-06-14 9:35 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2024-06-14 10:17 ` Naresh Kamboju
2024-06-14 12:00 ` Ron Economos
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2024-06-14 10:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 at 18:18, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.94 release.
> There are 85 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 15 Jun 2024 11:31:50 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.94-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 6.1.94-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-6.1.y
* git commit: 0669369075405ff8a9c8fdbcfdad1c10babf44ad
* git describe: v6.1.92-558-g066936907540
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.92-558-g066936907540
## Test Regressions (compared to v6.1.92-472-gae9f2a70d69e)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.1.92-472-gae9f2a70d69e)
## Test Fixes (compared to v6.1.92-472-gae9f2a70d69e)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.1.92-472-gae9f2a70d69e)
## Test result summary
total: 133520, pass: 114013, fail: 2055, skip: 17275, xfail: 177
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 139 total, 139 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 41 total, 41 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 31 total, 31 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 4 total, 4 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 11 total, 11 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 16 total, 16 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mm
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-watchdog
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-smoketest
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/85] 6.1.94-rc1 review
2024-06-13 11:34 [PATCH 6.1 00/85] 6.1.94-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-06-14 10:17 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2024-06-14 12:00 ` Ron Economos
2024-06-14 14:14 ` Mark Brown
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2024-06-14 12:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On 6/13/24 4:34 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.94 release.
> There are 85 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 15 Jun 2024 11:31:50 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.94-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/85] 6.1.94-rc1 review
2024-06-13 11:34 [PATCH 6.1 00/85] 6.1.94-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2024-06-14 12:00 ` Ron Economos
@ 2024-06-14 14:14 ` Mark Brown
2024-06-14 17:03 ` Jon Hunter
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2024-06-14 14:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 344 bytes --]
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 01:34:58PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.94 release.
> There are 85 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Tested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/85] 6.1.94-rc1 review
2024-06-13 11:34 [PATCH 6.1 00/85] 6.1.94-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2024-06-14 14:14 ` Mark Brown
@ 2024-06-14 17:03 ` Jon Hunter
2024-06-14 23:21 ` Peter Schneider
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2024-06-14 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie,
linux-tegra, stable
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 13:34:58 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.94 release.
> There are 85 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 15 Jun 2024 11:31:50 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.94-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v6.1:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
116 tests: 116 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 6.1.94-rc1-g066936907540
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/85] 6.1.94-rc1 review
2024-06-13 11:34 [PATCH 6.1 00/85] 6.1.94-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2024-06-14 17:03 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2024-06-14 23:21 ` Peter Schneider
2024-06-15 2:09 ` Shuah Khan
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Peter Schneider @ 2024-06-14 23:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
Am 13.06.2024 um 13:34 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.94 release.
> There are 85 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Builds, boots and works w/o regressions on 2-socket Ivy Bridge Xeon E5-2697 v2. It runs 8
VMs with some load for an hour now, and I don't see any problems or hiccups. No dmesg
oddities either.
Tested-by: Peter Schneider <pschneider1968@googlemail.com>
Beste Grüße,
Peter Schneider
--
Climb the mountain not to plant your flag, but to embrace the challenge,
enjoy the air and behold the view. Climb it so you can see the world,
not so the world can see you. -- David McCullough Jr.
OpenPGP: 0xA3828BD796CCE11A8CADE8866E3A92C92C3FF244
Download: https://www.peters-netzplatz.de/download/pschneider1968_pub.asc
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@googlemail.com
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/85] 6.1.94-rc1 review
2024-06-13 11:34 [PATCH 6.1 00/85] 6.1.94-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2024-06-14 23:21 ` Peter Schneider
@ 2024-06-15 2:09 ` Shuah Khan
2024-06-15 13:19 ` Mateusz Jończyk
2024-06-16 13:18 ` Florian Fainelli
10 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2024-06-15 2:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie, Shuah Khan
On 6/13/24 05:34, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.94 release.
> There are 85 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 15 Jun 2024 11:31:50 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.94-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/85] 6.1.94-rc1 review
2024-06-13 11:34 [PATCH 6.1 00/85] 6.1.94-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2024-06-15 2:09 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2024-06-15 13:19 ` Mateusz Jończyk
2024-06-16 13:18 ` Florian Fainelli
10 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Mateusz Jończyk @ 2024-06-15 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, broonie
W dniu 13.06.2024 o 13:34, Greg Kroah-Hartman pisze:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.94 release.
> There are 85 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 15 Jun 2024 11:31:50 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.94-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Hello,
Tested-by: Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>
Issues found:
- the WiFi signal sometimes is displayed as ~100%, even though the AP is far
away and the signal is weak. According to my notes, something like this I
have seen on some older stable kernels (6.1.68-rc1) and on Linus' kernels
since 6.7-rc3. I have never gotten around to reporting this seriously, just noticed
this again now that I use a more distant AP.
For example:
$ iw wlp2s0 station dump
Station 50:c7:bf:2c:a9:31 (on wlp2s0)
[...]
beacon loss: 0
beacon rx: 4418
rx drop misc: 7
signal: 0 [0, 0] dBm
signal avg: -2 [-3, -2] dBm
beacon signal avg: -68 dBm
[...]
On my laptop I use a Realtek RTL8822BE, but it happened also on
a desktop computer with a PCI-Express Intel WiFi card:
Intel Corporation Wireless 7265 [8086:095a] (rev 61)
Logs from this one-liner:
while true; do date; iw wlp2s0 station dump; sleep 5; done
can be found at the bottom of this mail.
Tested on a HP 17-by0001nw laptop with an Intel Kaby Lake CPU and Ubuntu 20.04.
Stack:
- amd64,
- ext4 on top of LVM on top of LUKS on top of mdraid on top of
NVMe and SATA drives (the SATA drive in a write-mostly mode).
Tested (lightly):
- suspend to RAM,
- suspend to disk,
- virtual machines in QEMU (both i386 and amd64 guests),
- GPU (Intel HD Graphics 620, tested with an Unigine benchmark)
- WiFi (Realtek RTL8822BE),
- PCI soundcard (Intel HD Audio),
- webcam.
Greetings,
Mateusz
sob, 15 cze 2024, 14:56:46 CEST
Station 50:c7:bf:2c:a9:31 (on wlp2s0)
inactive time: 593 ms
rx bytes: 1691981
rx packets: 10069
tx bytes: 131929
tx packets: 2000
tx retries: 0
tx failed: 0
beacon loss: 0
beacon rx: 4338
rx drop misc: 7
signal: -68 [-73, -68] dBm
signal avg: -67 [-73, -67] dBm
beacon signal avg: -68 dBm
tx bitrate: 175.5 MBit/s VHT-MCS 4 80MHz VHT-NSS 1
tx duration: 0 us
rx bitrate: 263.3 MBit/s VHT-MCS 6 80MHz VHT-NSS 1
rx duration: 0 us
authorized: yes
authenticated: yes
associated: yes
preamble: long
WMM/WME: yes
MFP: no
TDLS peer: no
DTIM period: 2
beacon interval:100
short slot time:yes
connected time: 769 seconds
associated at [boottime]: 3327.468s
associated at: 1718455437511 ms
current time: 1718456206519 ms
sob, 15 cze 2024, 14:56:51 CEST
Station 50:c7:bf:2c:a9:31 (on wlp2s0)
inactive time: 5601 ms
rx bytes: 1699466
rx packets: 10126
tx bytes: 131929
tx packets: 2000
tx retries: 0
tx failed: 0
beacon loss: 0
beacon rx: 4364
rx drop misc: 7
signal: -69 [-74, -69] dBm
signal avg: -68 [-73, -68] dBm
beacon signal avg: -68 dBm
tx bitrate: 175.5 MBit/s VHT-MCS 4 80MHz VHT-NSS 1
tx duration: 0 us
rx bitrate: 263.3 MBit/s VHT-MCS 6 80MHz VHT-NSS 1
rx duration: 0 us
authorized: yes
authenticated: yes
associated: yes
preamble: long
WMM/WME: yes
MFP: no
TDLS peer: no
DTIM period: 2
beacon interval:100
short slot time:yes
connected time: 774 seconds
associated at [boottime]: 3327.468s
associated at: 1718455437511 ms
current time: 1718456211526 ms
sob, 15 cze 2024, 14:56:56 CEST
Station 50:c7:bf:2c:a9:31 (on wlp2s0)
inactive time: 1392 ms
rx bytes: 1707004
rx packets: 10184
tx bytes: 132047
tx packets: 2001
tx retries: 0
tx failed: 0
beacon loss: 0
beacon rx: 4391
rx drop misc: 7
signal: -69 [-73, -69] dBm
signal avg: -68 [-73, -68] dBm
beacon signal avg: -68 dBm
tx bitrate: 175.5 MBit/s VHT-MCS 4 80MHz VHT-NSS 1
tx duration: 0 us
rx bitrate: 263.3 MBit/s VHT-MCS 6 80MHz VHT-NSS 1
rx duration: 0 us
authorized: yes
authenticated: yes
associated: yes
preamble: long
WMM/WME: yes
MFP: no
TDLS peer: no
DTIM period: 2
beacon interval:100
short slot time:yes
connected time: 779 seconds
associated at [boottime]: 3327.468s
associated at: 1718455437511 ms
current time: 1718456216538 ms
sob, 15 cze 2024, 14:57:01 CEST
Station 50:c7:bf:2c:a9:31 (on wlp2s0)
inactive time: 48 ms
rx bytes: 1827402
rx packets: 10287
tx bytes: 137924
tx packets: 2047
tx retries: 0
tx failed: 0
beacon loss: 0
beacon rx: 4418
rx drop misc: 7
signal: 0 [0, 0] dBm
signal avg: -2 [-3, -2] dBm
beacon signal avg: -68 dBm
tx bitrate: 175.5 MBit/s VHT-MCS 4 80MHz VHT-NSS 1
tx duration: 0 us
rx bitrate: 52.0 MBit/s VHT-MCS 5 VHT-NSS 1
rx duration: 0 us
authorized: yes
authenticated: yes
associated: yes
preamble: long
WMM/WME: yes
MFP: no
TDLS peer: no
DTIM period: 2
beacon interval:100
short slot time:yes
connected time: 784 seconds
associated at [boottime]: 3327.468s
associated at: 1718455437511 ms
current time: 1718456221547 ms
sob, 15 cze 2024, 14:57:06 CEST
Station 50:c7:bf:2c:a9:31 (on wlp2s0)
inactive time: 4857 ms
rx bytes: 1848410
rx packets: 10343
tx bytes: 138300
tx packets: 2051
tx retries: 0
tx failed: 0
beacon loss: 0
beacon rx: 4443
rx drop misc: 7
signal: -69 [-72, -69] dBm
signal avg: -66 [-70, -66] dBm
beacon signal avg: -68 dBm
tx bitrate: 175.5 MBit/s VHT-MCS 4 80MHz VHT-NSS 1
tx duration: 0 us
rx bitrate: 52.0 MBit/s VHT-MCS 5 VHT-NSS 1
rx duration: 0 us
authorized: yes
authenticated: yes
associated: yes
preamble: long
WMM/WME: yes
MFP: no
TDLS peer: no
DTIM period: 2
beacon interval:100
short slot time:yes
connected time: 789 seconds
associated at [boottime]: 3327.468s
associated at: 1718455437511 ms
current time: 1718456226559 ms
sob, 15 cze 2024, 14:57:11 CEST
Station 50:c7:bf:2c:a9:31 (on wlp2s0)
inactive time: 1467 ms
rx bytes: 1869290
rx packets: 10413
tx bytes: 140713
tx packets: 2061
tx retries: 0
tx failed: 0
beacon loss: 0
beacon rx: 4470
rx drop misc: 7
signal: -69 [-74, -69] dBm
signal avg: -63 [-68, -63] dBm
beacon signal avg: -69 dBm
tx bitrate: 175.5 MBit/s VHT-MCS 4 80MHz VHT-NSS 1
tx duration: 0 us
rx bitrate: 52.0 MBit/s VHT-MCS 5 VHT-NSS 1
rx duration: 0 us
authorized: yes
authenticated: yes
associated: yes
preamble: long
WMM/WME: yes
MFP: no
TDLS peer: no
DTIM period: 2
beacon interval:100
short slot time:yes
connected time: 794 seconds
associated at [boottime]: 3327.468s
associated at: 1718455437511 ms
current time: 1718456231570 ms
sob, 15 cze 2024, 14:57:16 CEST
Station 50:c7:bf:2c:a9:31 (on wlp2s0)
inactive time: 6481 ms
rx bytes: 1876386
rx packets: 10468
tx bytes: 140713
tx packets: 2061
tx retries: 0
tx failed: 0
beacon loss: 0
beacon rx: 4495
rx drop misc: 7
signal: -68 [-74, -68] dBm
signal avg: -69 [-73, -69] dBm
beacon signal avg: -68 dBm
tx bitrate: 175.5 MBit/s VHT-MCS 4 80MHz VHT-NSS 1
tx duration: 0 us
rx bitrate: 52.0 MBit/s VHT-MCS 5 VHT-NSS 1
rx duration: 0 us
authorized: yes
authenticated: yes
associated: yes
preamble: long
WMM/WME: yes
MFP: no
TDLS peer: no
DTIM period: 2
beacon interval:100
short slot time:yes
connected time: 799 seconds
associated at [boottime]: 3327.468s
associated at: 1718455437511 ms
current time: 1718456236584 ms
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/85] 6.1.94-rc1 review
2024-06-13 11:34 [PATCH 6.1 00/85] 6.1.94-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2024-06-15 13:19 ` Mateusz Jończyk
@ 2024-06-16 13:18 ` Florian Fainelli
10 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2024-06-16 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, allen.lkml, broonie
On 6/13/2024 12:34 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.94 release.
> There are 85 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 15 Jun 2024 11:31:50 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.94-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMST using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread