From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751769AbbCHWx3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Mar 2015 18:53:29 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:50156 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750918AbbCHWx0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Mar 2015 18:53:26 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Ulf Hansson Cc: "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , David Brown , Daniel Walker , Bryan Huntsman , Stephen Boyd , Tim Bird , Bjorn Andersson , Linus Walleij , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Srinivas Kandagatla Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/18] ARM: msm multiplatform support Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2015 23:52:50 +0100 Message-ID: <7616599.hAEbVQmATE@wuerfel> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.16.0-10-generic; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1425497592-1831064-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:/C8jHR6cbrjMfphcUcBVaUAYwYUaU/4/GupIGSQs4INogOCKri2 IS60xDH0Dji8NYfagsuVh6pzu9ssG2ggH3CTzujAAIOcPe8nmrk4P+VZKR4r53Wo+VPozGL ErajJxA4MkESvSsS+2ODRLFaeRFU//ejoB0LRisPBYClt7AMvOoohNacT86gp7Athu7bgSa e/mH4D+N57AqoNf1jpLtA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 05 March 2015 17:40:18 Ulf Hansson wrote: > The goal from my side is to entirely remove this mmc driver and > instead convert to use the mmci host driver. > > If I understand correctly, the current big blocker to reach that goal > is the DMA driver, since it's not converted to the DMA engine API? Do > you know if that's a correct statement? Yes, I think that is correct. As I wrote in the patch description, after we remove the serial-hs driver, msm_sdcc is the only user of the private MSM DMA API. I wasn't aware that this device is compatible with mmci, but that certainly simplifies things. > Anyway, I suppose this patchset can be considered as step in the right > direction, even if I don't like to take patches for the msm_sdcc.c. Ok. Arnd