Re: [PATCH RFT 3/6] serial: sh-sci: Move runtime PM enable to sci_probe_single()

[Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>]

On 19.12.2024 12:18, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Claudiu,
> 
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 4:58 PM Claudiu <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev> wrote:
>> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>
>>
>> Relocate the runtime PM enable operation to sci_probe_single(). This change
>> prepares the codebase for upcoming fixes.
>>
>> While at it, replace the existing logic with a direct call to
>> devm_pm_runtime_enable() and remove sci_cleanup_single(). The
>> devm_pm_runtime_enable() function automatically handles disabling runtime
>> PM during driver removal.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>
> 
> Thanks for your patch!
> 
>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
>> @@ -3440,7 +3434,6 @@ static int sci_probe_single(struct platform_device *dev,
>>
>>         ret = uart_add_one_port(&sci_uart_driver, &sciport->port);
>>         if (ret) {
>> -               sci_cleanup_single(sciport);
>>                 return ret;
>>         }
> 
> Next line is:
> 
>     return 0;
> 
> so please just merge that into
> 
>     return uart_add_one_port(&sci_uart_driver, &sciport->port);
> 

You're right with these.

> Actually [PATCH 5/6] makes that change, but there is no reason not
> to do that here.

I remember I chose to keep it like this as I had the impression that if I
format the patches as proposed by you the 5/6 will just revert what I will
have been done in this patch. But I think I was wrong.

Thank you,
Claudiu

> 
> For the logical changes:
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> 
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
>                         Geert
>