From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out30-110.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-110.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.110]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 128412BD18 for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 02:43:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.110 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719369833; cv=none; b=ZvSrI5+dMXk1azKjZy2PFaMlt6nsPLwlXNOoWfnkQU9dpYbC5We1x5VFl23cBITaZZuJxTPy2jVkC3HGv6yGFrq22rWKCaxK/tQNcxArrRG9UXLjw96SJhX5FBFXFkVYUKopdN9eySPpqNU5CjXnv0uwlxx85mw3ytW9gSe6XN4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719369833; c=relaxed/simple; bh=79ZyvXGq2QmC/+nujJTWSpy/2aFxCYRraNbkq0IYdQ8=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=fgs90OnoLOEjWHf6ca/P3Rp21+puE90KUeljugBKcLbOX9UDtF/VthsSvFsKtkkguMfo1lSAU6Zy+zXTLOunhndOfJjOofCXkArEa/jnNVU2ysnkehsW/SBmxuW2QqD+JmDKqTIkXe0krM1uhbh+oF61fq9LvN/aC8qCtPHUmzQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b=S9VgrL9m; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.110 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b="S9VgrL9m" DKIM-Signature:v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.alibaba.com; s=default; t=1719369823; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From:Content-Type; bh=gilfLfI8DleZahX8loDIEcplFpqkD9gVPjXwXFjAvqM=; b=S9VgrL9mNSV4u2WH2DcgX5XQYreHXEc8e5HYQmm1ZJIqmSwY/oEyTjyFqAXZqpZJyOUQEzPgdTwxzypm0G0Tjj/R3pOCH4lG2OMBGVQWYhszGh8La2u4orbhq1uQs/1EtaDQ8iSjJcv++Onfjbmdmy8kRCgMVIz92jrtMw496b4= X-Alimail-AntiSpam:AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R101e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=maildocker-contentspam033068164191;MF=dtcccc@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=16;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0W9Hbm46_1719369820; Received: from 30.97.48.207(mailfrom:dtcccc@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0W9Hbm46_1719369820) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 10:43:42 +0800 Message-ID: <76c12fee-6cd7-4932-9cd9-fb450e485eb2@linux.alibaba.com> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 10:43:37 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 29/35] sched: handle preempt=voluntary under PREEMPT_AUTO Content-Language: en-US To: Ankur Arora Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, paulmck@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org, raghavendra.kt@amd.com, sshegde@linux.ibm.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, Ingo Molnar , Vincent Guittot , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20240528003521.979836-1-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com> <20240528003521.979836-30-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com> <8e6f02a0-2bd0-4e75-9055-2cb7c508ce4e@linux.alibaba.com> <87h6dmazs5.fsf@oracle.com> <87ikxxakq5.fsf@oracle.com> From: Tianchen Ding In-Reply-To: <87ikxxakq5.fsf@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2024/6/25 09:12, Ankur Arora wrote: > > Side question: are there any benchmarks that would exercise various types > of sched policy, idle and otherwise? > AFAIK, no. May need to combine workloads with different sched policies set by manual... Or let's see if anyone else can offer suggestions. Thanks.